General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSchumer just wrote a NY Times opinion piece explaining his actions - link
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/13/opinion/trump-musk-shutdown-senate.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShareOver the past two months, the United States has confronted a bitter truth: The federal government has been taken over by a nihilist.
President Trump has taken a blowtorch to our country and wielded chaos like a weapon. Most Republicans in Congress, meanwhile, have caved to his every whim. The Grand Old Party has devolved into a crowd of Trump sycophants and MAGA radicals who seem to want to burn everything to the ground.
Now, Republicans’ nihilism has brought us to a new brink of disaster: Unless Congress acts, the federal government will shut down Friday at midnight.
As I have said many times, there are no winners in a government shutdown. But there are certainly victims: the most vulnerable Americans, those who rely on federal programs to feed their families, get medical care and stay financially afloat. Communities that depend on government services to function will suffer.
This week Democrats offered a way out: Fund the government for another month to give appropriators more time to do their jobs. Republicans rejected this proposal.
Why? Because Mr. Trump doesn’t want the appropriators to do their job. He wants full control over government spending.
He isn’t the first president to want this, but he may be the first president since Andrew Jackson to successfully cow his party into submission. That leads Democrats to a difficult decision: Either proceed with the bill before us or risk Mr. Trump throwing America into the chaos of a shutdown.
This, in my view, is no choice at all.
For sure, the Republican bill is a terrible option. It is deeply partisan. It doesn’t address this country’s needs. But even if the White House says differently, Mr. Trump and Elon Musk want a shutdown. We should not give them one. The risk of allowing the president to take even more power via a government shutdown is a much worse path.
To be clear: No one on my side of the aisle wants a government shutdown. Members who support this continuing resolution do not want that. Members who oppose it do not want that.
Members who oppose this resolution want the Republicans to take their responsibilities more seriously and to negotiate spending bills that will address the many needs of the American people.
I respect my fellow Democrats for that. Unfortunately, this Republican Party is the party of Trump.
As bad as passing the continuing resolution would be, I believe a government shutdown is far worse.
First, a shutdown would give Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk permission to destroy vital government services at a significantly faster rate than they can right now. Under a shutdown, the Trump administration would have wide-ranging authority to deem whole agencies, programs and personnel nonessential, furloughing staff members with no promise they would ever be rehired.
The decisions about what is essential would, in practice, be largely up to the executive branch, with few left at agencies to check it.
Mr. Musk has reportedly said that he wants a shutdown and may already be planning how to use one to his advantage.
Second, if we enter a shutdown, congressional Republicans could weaponize their majorities to cherry-pick which parts of government to reopen.
In a protracted shutdown, House and Senate Republicans could bring bills to the floor to reopen only their favored departments and agencies while leaving other vital services that they don’t like to languish.
Third, shutdowns mean real pain for American families.
For example, a shutdown could cause regional Veterans Affairs offices to reduce even more of their staffs, further delay benefits processing and curtail mental health services — abandoning veterans who earned, and depend on, those resources.
A shutdown could continue to slash the administrative staffs at Social Security offices — delaying applications and benefit adjustments and forcing seniors to wait even longer for their benefits.
A shutdown could further stall federal court cases and furlough critical staff members — denying victims and defendants alike their day in court, dragging out appeals and clogging the justice system for months or years.
Finally, a shutdown would be the best distraction Donald Trump could ask for from his awful agenda.
Right now, Mr. Trump owns the chaos in the government. He owns the chaos in the stock market. He owns the damage happening to our economy. The stock market is falling, and consumer confidence is plummeting.
In a shutdown, we would be busy fighting with Republicans over which agencies to reopen and which to keep closed instead of debating the damage Mr. Trump’s agenda is causing.
I believe it is my job to make the best choice for the country, to minimize the harms to the American people. Therefore, I will vote to keep the government open.

InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,929 posts)TheBlackAdder
(29,363 posts)While Schumer makes sound points, if a shutdown would do all that, the Republicans would shut this shit down tomorrow.
Trump would have worked it out with his party to do so.
That's why something seems fugazi.
Response to Alhena (Original post)
InAbLuEsTaTe This message was self-deleted by its author.
JohnSJ
(98,069 posts)that is very appropriate for the times we are in.
surfered
(5,424 posts)mr715
(1,538 posts)Big Blue Marble
(5,570 posts)They did not have the courage to use them.
uponit7771
(92,521 posts)mr715
(1,538 posts)Maybe, like, something?
Anything?
Anything?
Maybe shake up leadership a little. If for no other reason that to acknowledge the love affair of the American public has for democrats in Congress has, shall we say, cooled?
Docreed2003
(18,104 posts)In other words, he planned to vote for this and orchestrated a response...ok
Skittles
(162,443 posts)he was never wavering on this
Docreed2003
(18,104 posts)This type of political gamesmanship is infuriating.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,234 posts)They have the House, Senate, and White House and they shit all over Democrats at every turn.
Let it go for once, Chuck. Don't bail them out this time. They'll only twist the knife in our backs again.
Emile
(33,098 posts)tman
(1,163 posts)Something Republicans know all too well.
smh
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,694 posts)TSF is shooting himself in the ----. Let him own all the chaos.
Silent Type
(8,646 posts)Thanks for posting this article. Hope someone reads it.
gab13by13
(26,964 posts)He reads his speeches.
Docreed2003
(18,104 posts)mzmolly
(52,008 posts)sharing. We're in a no win situation.
orangecrush
(23,582 posts)
dweller
(25,974 posts)


✌🏻
BannonsLiver
(18,955 posts)
MichMan
(14,438 posts)Carlitos Brigante
(26,804 posts)pretend the fascists just had to get their way. Or else our so called free press would just be "so mean" to him.
DSandra
(1,532 posts)You know what’s painful? Your entire country in ruins, being destitute with nothing but despair and misery in your future, no country left while the billionaires carve up your country and make monarchical network states with nothing but miserable slavery for the future of most Americans.
Hassler
(4,125 posts)kansasobama
(1,688 posts)Problem is, Schumer still thinks democracy exists. Rules don't apply now
kansasobama
(1,688 posts)That is the problem.
kacekwl
(8,031 posts)Democrats need to vote no and take a stand against this. He's going to go to the breaking point where people will have to stop him, one way or another. The pain, hardship, uncertainty, are quickly going to be challenged by the American people who will find a way to stop it. There are plenty of democrats who can explain their position and explain who is responsible. He's going to blame democrats whatever way it goes.
OAITW r.2.0
(29,567 posts)Let's focus on primarying Chuck.
elocs
(23,589 posts)We would be fortunate to have free, fair, and unrigged elections in '16 since Musk succeeded in cheating for Trump in the swing states in '24.
Mountainguy
(1,549 posts)when you vote for the Republican budget.
"We offered to keep the government open for a month but they said no.....so we just did what they wanted instead."
Schumer isn't built for this fight. He needs to resign and hand over leadership to someone who is.
Raven123
(6,474 posts)While Bernie is out there meeting the people, Chuck is writing an editorial. To be clear, I don’t expect the Minority Leader to be having rallies and town halls as often as another senator, given his responsibilities. But can you really reach the majority of Dem voters through an opinion piece in the NYT? I just don’t think Chuck is meeting the Democrats where they are. He is not rhetorically gifted. He is not a good communicator on social media. I think he is not the right person for this moment.
Hanzzy72
(58 posts)Trying to explain away his capitulation through an op-ed that is behind a paywall has got to be the most out of touch thing I have ever seen. I think it's time for a change in leadership.
elocs
(23,589 posts)"A shutdown would give Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk permission to destroy vital government services at a significantly faster rate than they can right now. Under a shutdown, the Trump administration would have wide-ranging authority to deem whole agencies, programs and personnel nonessential, furloughing staff members with no promise they would ever be rehired."
There's no good choice here, just one between bad and horrible.