Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erronis

(19,273 posts)
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 08:27 PM Yesterday

The enshittification of tech jobs -- Cory Doctorow

https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/27/some-animals/#are-more-equal-than-others

I was extremely lucky to enter the tech workforce in the early 1970s and exit about 50 years later. From what I've seen the environment has deteriorated very similarly to what Cory describes. I loved my life with small entrepreneurial firms and contracting solo to some major ones. It now seems so commodified and almost stultifying.

Tech workers are a weird choice for "princes of labor," but for decades they've enjoyed unparalleled labor power, expressed in high wages, lavish stock grants, and whimsical campuses with free laundry and dry-cleaning, gourmet cafeterias, and kombucha on tap:

All of this, despite the fact that tech union density is so low it can barely be charted. Tech workers' power didn't come from solidarity, it came from scarcity. When you're getting five new recruiter emails every day, you don't need a shop steward to tell your boss to go fuck themselves at the morning scrum. You can do it yourself, secure in the knowledge that there's a company across the road who'll give you a better job by lunchtime.

Tech bosses sucked up to their workers because tech workers are insanely productive. Even with sky-high salaries, every hour a tech worker puts in on the job translates into massive profits. Which created a conundrum for tech bosses: if tech workers produce incalculable value for the company every time they touch their keyboards, and if there aren't enough tech workers to go around, how do you get whichever tech workers you can hire to put in as many hours as possible?

The answer is a tactic that Fobazi Ettarh called "vocational awe":

"Vocational awe" describes the feeling that your work matters so much that you should accept all manner of tradeoffs and calamities to get the job done. Ettarh uses the term to describe the pathology of librarians, teachers, nurses and other underpaid, easily exploited workers in "caring professions." Tech workers are weird candidates for vocational awe, given how well-paid they are, but never let it be said that tech bosses don't know how to innovate – they successfully transposed an exploitation tactic from the most precarious professionals to the least precarious.

As farcical as all the engineer-pampering tech bosses got up to for the first couple decades of this century was, it certainly paid off. Tech workers stayed at the office for every hour that god sent, skipping their parents' funerals and their kids' graduations to ship on time. Snark all you like about empty platitudes like "organize the world's information and make it useful" or "bring the world closer together," but you can't argue with results: workers who could – and did – bargain for anything from their bosses…except a 40-hour work-week.

. . .
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The enshittification of tech jobs -- Cory Doctorow (Original Post) erronis Yesterday OP
Interesting senseandsensibility Yesterday #1
I completely understand. The disparities were bad in the 80s but became ridiculous in this century. erronis Yesterday #3
Yeah, you have to have lived it to understand senseandsensibility Yesterday #4
Kick dalton99a Yesterday #2

senseandsensibility

(21,781 posts)
1. Interesting
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 08:33 PM
Yesterday

A little hard for me who spent my career in one of the "easily exploitable" caring professions to identify with. However, I have spent my entire adult life in Silicon Valley, most of it right in the heart of SV. So I've heard similar stories. What I didn't like was right before the recession of 2007 our techie friends were kind of good naturedly making fun of my hubby and me for "working for peanuts". Then they got laid off and we didn't kid them back.

erronis

(19,273 posts)
3. I completely understand. The disparities were bad in the 80s but became ridiculous in this century.
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 09:04 PM
Yesterday

I couldn't afford to live within 100 miles of San Francisco now. Even the high-earners of Silicon Valley are being priced out.

Now I try to spend my time volunteering and hoping someone will help take care of me when I need.

senseandsensibility

(21,781 posts)
4. Yeah, you have to have lived it to understand
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 09:08 PM
Yesterday

but we were at least lucky to buy a house in a "barely" commutable suburb back in the 90's. Even that was difficult. Don't know how people make it now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The enshittification of t...