General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMarisa Kabas: ICE stopping cars in DC and asking for papers
@marisakabas.bsky.social
Im told they were stopping people at this intersection and asking them for their papers.
Migrant Solidarity Mutual Aid
@dcmigrantmutualaid.org
1h
🚨 ICE activity reports for 5/9:
Activity reported at
- Fort Totten Dr & Gallatin St NE at 8:00AM
- 5 officers - 3 ATF, others federal police
- 4 unmarked black cars with VA tags
- At least one person detained
May 9, 2025 at 10:03 AM

Prairie Gates
(5,005 posts)I get that it's a Nazi reference, but what papers are people required to carry around? A driver's license if you're driving, sure, but what is this even about?
IronLionZion
(48,742 posts)They are harassing Americans on their way to work. I carry my US passport card everywhere in addition to my driver's license because of a-holes like this.
Lonestarblue
(12,595 posts)I cannot see how this is even legal. What ever happened to a requirement of probable cause for stopping people?
allegorical oracle
(4,827 posts)through. Lived in DC for three years and never carried anything except my driver license. WHO carries their passport with them everywhere? Geesh, this is beginning to sound like Russia.
barbtries
(30,384 posts)unreasonable search and seizure.
rsdsharp
(10,755 posts)It requires reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime based on specific objective facts. Cops tend to forget the crime element, as well as the objective facts, and detain for investigation.
Ponietz
(3,634 posts)The Supreme Court paved the way for fascism.
rsdsharp
(10,755 posts)LiberalArkie
(18,130 posts)TommyT139
(1,369 posts)It's after the date for Real ID implementation. Some states issue driver's licenses to non-citizens.
Real ID was always about this sort of thing: "papers please," and denying the vote to large numbers of people.
It used to be part of the definition of the United States, that we didn't need permission to travel within our own borders. That was a Russian thing.
LiberalArkie
(18,130 posts)want to know who you are. Just saying you are John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Bangkok is really not going to get it. They want some kind of proof.
I like real-id but it has one major fault. If a person is using a stolen ID, in other words they assumed the name of a person who died many years ago and is the same age as they are. They can request the birth certificate of that person. They can then request the Social Security card by having the certified birth certificate and a bill with their address and name on it and get a real id.
It is probably fool proof for the honest population but for a spy or terrorist it does nothing.
flying_wahini
(8,070 posts)oldmanlynn
(651 posts)We have alot of Hispanic workers here in Louisiana and while i dont know their status, there is no news of arrests or detainments here
allegorical oracle
(4,827 posts)after people of color, says my betting self.
FalloutShelter
(13,314 posts)why do they look like terrorists, faces covered...etc? Oh that's right... they ARE terrorists.
Nevermind.
uponit7771
(92,840 posts)... country when dealing with general public?!?!
If they're going after cartels I could understand but people with babies and families don't want to make a hit on agents acting like they got some sense
Magoo48
(6,285 posts)Thats who.
uponit7771
(92,840 posts)... even they went nuts cause murdering people en masse isn't healthy for anyone
pdxflyboy
(840 posts)They are J-6 filth who have been recruited into the Trump Gestapo, NOT Federal law enforcement.
uponit7771
(92,840 posts)MorbidButterflyTat
(2,921 posts)They're just standing there at the side of the road, with their stupid masks and "police" costume.
DENVERPOPS
(12,059 posts)are actually legal any more.....so the put them in lower class areas because those people don't know that.
Sooo what the hell could this have been.............
They keep inching forward, bit by bit........
Cheezoholic
(2,941 posts)I'm no lawyer but those Law Guy videos that get posted I've heard him say that. Cops can't ask for your ID without announcing what law they think you may have violated or unless required by federal law, like getting on planes. If they are stopping every car these people should all should refuse to present their ID's or this could spread.
PCIntern
(27,321 posts)I do not know a single person who carries sufficient identification with them that proves that they are a citizen of the United States. My passport leaves my house when I take a vacation on a cruise line or a plane overseas. Otherwise it sits in my drawer. My birth certificate is Also in the same place and never leaves the house.
haele
(14,181 posts)Other than that, most other people might regularly carry a Drivers License or state I D. that might be a Real ID. People aren't supposed to carry their Social Security card with them, and VA cards aren't RealID.
I'm a Military Retiree, but if I don't have my purse or wallet on me, like if I'm out on a local walk or up at the complex clubhouse to go swimming or play pool, I won't have my wallet on me. And if my house gets raided, I don't trust "Officers Anonymous" not to ignore my ID or purse and just take me in anyway for whatever reason they chose, claiming I was someone else and had no papers on me
PCIntern
(27,321 posts)If thats true, then people who are not citizens cannot fly within the United States without a passport.
I have real ID, but technically it doesnt prove anything. Other than that I am who I say I am in terms of identity.
haele
(14,181 posts)Federal rules - you need to provide at the least a Social Security Card, Passport, Green Card or Work Visa as well as proof of current residency in the United States for at least one year
As RealID can also be issued by states for the Federal Government as part of their driver's license or state ID program, some states also require a birth certificate and proof of legal name change if the name on the birth certificate is different than on other documentation. This can be tricky for those who got married, adopted or otherwise might not have a recognized birth or marriage certificate to match a name change to.
Which is an inconsistency that means RealID cannot be used to verify someone under the new SAVE act.
Ms. Toad
(36,836 posts)States are free to issue drivers licenses/IDs to individuals who cannot prove all name changes since birth or legal residency.
So one might well be a person who didn't bother to go through the hassle of getting copies of all name change documents and be legally driving with a non-compliant driver's license and still be a legal resident of the US.
haele
(14,181 posts)So my state issued driver's license is non-compliant with the RealID program. I never changed my name when I got married, so I've got no issue with Birth Certificate match if they pull some BS with an ID that meets the SAVE act, other than sheer outrage on how far into the fascist grave this country has fallen.
But I'll bet you don't carry your birth certificate with you - so if you are randomly stopped while driving the fact that you have a noncompliant driver's license means nothing other than that you have the right to drive . . . But I'm betting that ICE would use that against anyone with brown skin or an accent to haul them in.
allegorical oracle
(4,827 posts)ID. Thought it was a bunch of fuss over nothing. But I did it. Makes me wonder how long the Repugs have had this whole ID mess planned. Surely, they can't be that smart (especially Bushes).
tetedur
(1,246 posts)And I brought a bill showing my address.
allegorical oracle
(4,827 posts)make a second trip to bring my first marriage divorce degree and my second marriage certificate (another surname change) plus two bills showing that I live where I live. Took two 60-miles rounds trips just to renew my driver license. But now I'm glad I've got the real ID.
Botany
(74,071 posts)
the Doge Boyz that will allow them to see a persons voting history, who they contributed to,
what organizations they belong to, educational history, and all about their families. And if some-
thing comes up will they take the person into custody?
jmbar2
(6,852 posts)appmanga
(1,109 posts)...what Gestapo does.
Lancero
(3,169 posts)CanonRay
(15,247 posts)Random checkpoints, masks, lack of visible ID.
Cheezoholic
(2,941 posts)BoRaGard
(5,286 posts)
underpants
(190,470 posts)erronis
(19,498 posts)doc03
(37,781 posts)This what we see coming out of Russia.
Basso8vb
(931 posts)dchill
(42,270 posts)... They don't have to show any identification.
Until those two things are stopped, we are falling straight down at very high speed.
Hekate
(97,501 posts)Homegrown terrorists
markpkessinger
(8,718 posts)Old Crank
(5,650 posts)was against 'papers' to be carried. No national ID. That is what godless commies did.
Now.....
IronLionZion
(48,742 posts)They've been after ID "to stop voter fraud" for many years.
Old Crank
(5,650 posts)One reason your SSAN card had not to be used for ID printed on it. I still have my original card.
DENVERPOPS
(12,059 posts)the Republican Mantra was: Better Dead than Red........now look at them.....Red States, Red Ball Caps, following the leader of the former major RED nation....
That whole group was always saying that we had to watch out for all the: Pinko Commies.....
Old Crank
(5,650 posts)I moved to AZ from Canada in 65.
One of my father's coworkers at a company was a member of the Minute men. He showed my father some type of big gun he always carried in his car trunk, jsut in case the commies came,,
DENVERPOPS
(12,059 posts)I ALMOST MOVED TO CANADA FROM COLORADO IN 67..........
Bo Zarts
(25,988 posts)I want to see their fucking papers!
DENVERPOPS
(12,059 posts)during Trump's first term, his group of un-identifiable, battle dressed soldiers that grabbed people demonstrating in Oregon, and threw them in unmarked vans with no license plates........later thought to be extreme racist, Border Patrol agents brought up from the Mexico Border.....
No one knew who they were, where they came from, or what they were doing, or what happened to the people they threw in the vans and whisked away....It was like Trump's private Gestapo...or more realistically what a tyrant dictator like Putin does with demonstrators.......
Bo Zarts
(25,988 posts)
DENVERPOPS
(12,059 posts)Amway heirs???????
I guess Trump didn't think she did as good of a job of destroying public education in his first administration as Sec of Education...
Or, he could have more control over MRS WWE........
Cheezoholic
(2,941 posts)than most states according to migrantmutualaid.org. BUT I'd like to see some corroborating reports of an actual road block or a random stopping point.
obamanut2012
(28,448 posts)If she posts it, she has the goods.
Evidence is in the OP.
Cheezoholic
(2,941 posts)Vinca
(52,011 posts)orangecrush
(24,526 posts)They're hiding their faces to avoid eventual prosecution.
republianmushroom
(19,781 posts)relayerbob
(7,172 posts)Lose the masks, show the badges and a warrant, or get the fuck away from my car.
Ferrets are Cool
(22,165 posts)
bpj62
(1,049 posts)Lots of older garden style apartments up in that area which is over by Catholuc University. I am not surprised that they are doing this in that area.
They wear masks so you cannot identify them and attempt to press civil charges against them. They refuse to tell you thier names or which organization they are with. Once you are in that van you are screwed.
Those vans are the modern day trains that loaded up the Jews and the other undesirables and took them to the concentration camps. The officers need to be constantly reminded that "just following orders" didn't work fir the Nazis at Nuremberg. Sooner or later there will be a reckoning.
LiberalArkie
(18,130 posts)The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which includes the Border Patrol, is the largest law enforcement agency in the country. Their jurisdiction they claim spans 100 miles into the interior of the United States from any land or maritime border. Two-thirds of the U.S. population lives within this 100-mile border enforcement zone, including cities like Washington D.C., San Francisco CA, Chicago IL, New Orleans LA, Boston MA, & more.
In 1946, Congress quietly passed a statute giving U.S. Customs and Border Protection the authority to stop and search all vehicles within a reasonable distance from the border. Shortly thereafter, the agency defined that distance as 100 miles from all land borders and coastlines, thus crowning themselves kings of what is now known as the 100-mile zone, an area in which nearly two-thirds of the U.S. population lives. That regulation, which effectively allows border officers to disregard key Fourth Amendment protections within that area, has remained in place ever since.
And since no Democratic congress or president ever sought to have it changed.. We get what we pay for.
jgmiller
(548 posts)and a border is defined to include any port of entry which means any international airport is included so really if you live in Kansas (or some place like that) they can't operate there.
They have been doing stuff like this for years, they will pull over Greyhoud busses and demand to see people's papers. However you are not required to show them your papers or whatever they think they need. You still have 4th ammendment rights and you can tell them that, of course they might try and detain you but if you respectfully put up enough of a stink they will move on. They know what they are doing only works if you give in to them and if you don't they don't have a legal leg to stand on.
Buddyzbuddy
(797 posts)BigDemVoter
(4,623 posts)Don't they have to have some kind of reasonable suspicion? This is so disgusting.
pandr32
(12,937 posts)Unless there is an orange alert abduction, or a surprise check for people drinking and driving there has do be a valid reason to stop you and ask for your ID. Is this not a free country with laws?
Passages
(2,737 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,301 posts)Attilatheblond
(5,846 posts)How many people ride around with all the docs these fascists want to prove we have a right to exist here? I don't have a passport, do not carry birth certificate and marriage certificate to explain name change, and my driver's license expires in a few months, so I will get the new one required then.
This is more than unreasonable search, this is Nazi shit.
HAB911
(9,625 posts)You have the right to remain silent or tell the agent that youll only answer questions in the presence of an attorney, no matter your citizenship or immigration status. You do not have to answer questions about your immigration status. You may simply say that you do not wish to answer those questions. If you choose to remain silent, the agent will likely ask you questions for longer, but your silence alone is not enough to support probable cause or reasonable suspicion to arrest, detain, or search you or your belongings.
A limited exception does exist: for people who do have permission to be in the U.S. for a specific reason and for, usually, a limited amount of time (a nonimmigrant on a visa, for example), the law does require you to provide information about your immigration status if asked. While you can still choose to remain silent or decline a request to produce your documents, people in this category should be aware that they could face arrest consequences. If you want to know whether you fall into this category, you should consult an attorney.
Generally, an immigration officer cannot detain you without reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion is less robust than probable cause, but it is certainly not just a hunch or gut feeling. An agent must have specific facts about you that make it reasonable to believe you are committing or committed, a violation of immigration law or federal law.
If an agent detains you, you can ask for their basis for reasonable suspicion, and they should tell you.
An immigration officer also cannot search you or your belongings without either probable cause or your consent. If an agent asks you if they can search your belongings, you have the right to say no.
An immigration officer cannot arrest you without probable cause.
That means the agent must have facts about you that make it probable that you are committing, or committed, a violation of immigration law or federal law.
Deuxcents
(22,079 posts)Dont have to tell us? What if these are people who are not government officials and if they are, they must know its illegal. Time for Congress to get off the gravy train and pass laws to protect us so the courts can enforce our rights
MorbidButterflyTat
(2,921 posts)IOW, convicted felons.
Deuxcents
(22,079 posts)angrychair
(10,587 posts)Maybe someone knows something different but ICE or any other federal agency, cannot just stop people at random and demand identification or proof of citizenship. It's a violation of 4th amendment...which applies even to undocumented immigrants.
4th Amendment:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
angrychair
(10,587 posts)first order of business if we ever again control majorities in Congress and the WH is to dissolve ICE or at the very least dramatically scale back their ever creeping authority. Really have reached the level of Geheime Staatspolizei and it's only a matter of time before they start killing people.
azureblue
(2,416 posts)Guarantee them a fair trial? Why is ICE allowed to ignore the Constitution in the first place? And why aren't there lawyers out there challenging the warrantless kidnappings? Shouldn't DC cops be arresting these masked kidnappers?
orangecrush
(24,526 posts)
IronLionZion
(48,742 posts)DC is within 100 miles of the ocean, which counts as a border.
Are immigration officials allowed to stop people in places wholly inside the U.S.?
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the federal agency tasked with patrolling the U.S. border and areas that function like a border, claims a territorial reach much larger than you might imagine. A federal law says that, without a warrant, CBP can board vehicles and vessels and search for people without immigration documentation within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States. These external boundaries include international land borders but also the entire U.S. coastline.
Are there limitations to immigration officials power?
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects against arbitrary searches and seizures of people and their property, even in this expanded border area. Furthermore, as a general matter, these agents jurisdiction extends only to immigration violations and federal crimes. And, depending on where you are in this area and how long an agent detains you, agents must have varying levels of suspicion to hold you.
We will examine specific scenarios where one might encounter CBP in more depth, but here are your key rights. These apply to every situation, outside of customs and ports of entry.
You have the right to remain silent or tell the agent that youll only answer questions in the presence of an attorney, no matter your citizenship or immigration status. You do not have to answer questions about your immigration status. You may simply say that you do not wish to answer those questions. If you choose to remain silent, the agent will likely ask you questions for longer, but your silence alone is not enough to support probable cause or reasonable suspicion to arrest, detain, or search you or your belongings.
A limited exception does exist: for people who do have permission to be in the U.S. for a specific reason and for, usually, a limited amount of time (a nonimmigrant on a visa, for example), the law does require you to provide information about your immigration status if asked. While you can still choose to remain silent or decline a request to produce your documents, people in this category should be aware that they could face arrest consequences. If you want to know whether you fall into this category, you should consult an attorney.
Generally, an immigration officer cannot detain you without reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion is less robust than probable cause, but it is certainly not just a hunch or gut feeling. An agent must have specific facts about you that make it reasonable to believe you are committing or committed, a violation of immigration law or federal law.
If an agent detains you, you can ask for their basis for reasonable suspicion, and they should tell you.
An immigration officer also cannot search you or your belongings without either probable cause or your consent. If an agent asks you if they can search your belongings, you have the right to say no.
An immigration officer cannot arrest you without probable cause.
That means the agent must have facts about you that make it probable that you are committing, or committed, a violation of immigration law or federal law.
Your silence alone meets neither of these standards. Nor does your race or ethnicity alone suffice for either probable cause or reasonable suspicion.
Other important factors to keep in mind:
If an agent asks you for documents, what you need to provide differs depending on your immigration status. U.S. citizens do not have to carry proof of citizenship on their person if they are in the United States. If you have valid immigration documents and are over the age of 18, the law does require you to carry those documents on you. If you are asked by an immigration agent to produce them, it is advisable to show the documents to the agent or you risk being arrested. If you are an immigrant without documents, you can decline the officers request. An agent may likely ask you more questions if you decline a request. No matter what category you fall into, never provide false documents to immigration officials.
People who have entered the U.S. without inspection by an immigration official may be subject to expedited removal from the U.S. Expedited removal is a summary deportation that bypasses an immigration judge. The federal government says that it will only attempt to apply expedited removal to individuals who have entered the United States without inspection in the last 14 days, have been encountered by an immigration officer within 100 miles of the border, and meet certain other criteria. If you are told that you are subject to expedited removal but do not fall within that category, you should let the agents know. Also, if you fear persecution if returned to your country of origin, you should immediately inform the agents of your fear.
Qutzupalotl
(15,343 posts)MorbidButterflyTat
(2,921 posts)i was a cathar...
(16 posts)This is a violation of the 4th Amendment, I would think. Or does their crime trump following the Constitution?
FirstLight
(15,064 posts)Just like it was done in Massachusetts, we need to do it everywhere they show up and refuse to show their stupid faces!
😡 For everybody up thread saying this can't be legal I'm sorry but I think that ship has sailed. Apparently if they don't need a warrant and if they don't need to show ID then really it's just if they don't like the look of you or if you mouth off and they'll lock your ass up!
Is America great again yet? 🤬🤬🤬
MorbidButterflyTat
(2,921 posts)Fat asses with US flag masks cosplaying with "police" vests.
I wonder why they are wearing masks.