Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,920 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 01:27 PM Jul 15

ICE Lawyers Are Hiding Their Names in Immigration Court

Inside a federal immigration courtroom in New York City last month, a judge took an exceedingly unusual step: declining to state the name of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement attorney pressing to deport asylum seekers.

“We’re not really doing names publicly,” said Judge ShaSha Xu — after stating her own name and those of the immigrants and their lawyers. It was the first of two separate instances The Intercept identified in which judges chose to withhold the identities of the attorneys representing the Trump administration’s deportation regime.

As ICE agents across the country wear masks to raid workplaces and detain immigrants, government attorneys need not cover their faces to shield their identities. Legal experts who spoke to The Intercept agreed the practice of concealing the lawyers’ identities was both novel and concerning.

“I’ve never heard of someone in open court not being identified,” said Elissa Steglich, a law professor and co-director of the Immigration Clinic at the University of Texas at Austin. “Part of the court’s ethical obligation is transparency, including clear identification of the parties. Not identifying an attorney for the government means if there are unethical or professional concerns regarding [the Department of Homeland Security], the individual cannot be held accountable. And it makes the judge appear partial to the government.”

https://theintercept.com/2025/07/15/ice-lawyers-hiding-names-court/

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hugin

(36,640 posts)
4. We're down to distorting the meaning of meeting one's accuser.
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 01:32 PM
Jul 15

Not even close to due process. But, with Ginny's SCrOTUS it's fly.

Ping Tung

(3,069 posts)
6. Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 01:33 PM
Jul 15
Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity. Lord Acton

moniss

(7,705 posts)
7. If I were an immigration lawyer defending a detainee I would
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 01:37 PM
Jul 15

tell the judge I refuse to give my name. I would also be filing charges with any professional boards etc. regarding the judges and the government attorneys as John Doe cases if need be. This is only a step away from a judge taking motions and briefs from one side and not making them available to the other side. Secret pleadings by secret prosecutors are not far behind.

erronis

(20,662 posts)
12. And no ability for the opposing counsel (or the public) to question the credentials/legitimacy
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 03:15 PM
Jul 15

Pretty soon we'll have masked 'ICE' personnel in full regalia standing in front of the judge and saying: You don't know who I am, but I know who you are. OBEY!

Response to douglas9 (Original post)

Arazi

(8,177 posts)
10. Are these pro bono attorneys from law firms that capitulated to Traitor?
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 02:51 PM
Jul 15

Are they trying to hide their complicity?

🤔

(This is not what a functioning healthy democracy does by the way…)

róisín_dubh

(12,076 posts)
11. I testify for asylum seekers...
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 03:09 PM
Jul 15

I’ve told lawyers I’m not super interested in doing this anymore. I hate not helping, but I also am far more comfortable giving written affidavits

2na fisherman

(37 posts)
13. Camera Stellata
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 03:23 PM
Jul 15

Also known as Kangaroo Court.
So it's obvious that these lawyers fear they could be held accountable for doing something illegal or unethical if they are named as parties to such cases. Consciousness of guilt. How do bar associations treat this lack of transparency?

BurnDoubt

(831 posts)
14. Can Defense Counsel appear Masked ?????
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 03:29 PM
Jul 15

NOPE!!!!!
This is WRONG!!!!! No one should be allowed to be anonymous in a Courtroom. This practice invites abuse, and abrogates the Rights of the Accused.
Do we next excuse perjury if it supports a conviction?????
Democracy suffocates cin Secrecy.

Karasu

(1,654 posts)
17. Their agents won't show their faces and their lawyers won't give their names. And we're supposed to pretend this shit is
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 04:05 PM
Jul 15

completely normal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ICE Lawyers Are Hiding Th...