I suspect they hesitate to meddle with the contents because if they do, it could come back to really bite them hard. Covering up after the fact is a crime after all.

johnnyfins

(2,527 posts)

2. Zero. She is waiting for the public to get him.

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Thu Jul 17, 2025, 11:36 PM

Jul 17

Play along

Mr.WeRP

(857 posts)

5. It won't matter at this point.

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Thu Jul 17, 2025, 11:39 PM

Jul 17

They’ve lost the MAGA base which is now fractured with many well-known voices, Nick Fuentes, Candice Owens, Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk and especially Alex Jones are out there calling b.s. on Trump tearing the illusion Trump built for his cult apart.

pat_k

(11,507 posts)

12. Hope you are right.

Reply to Mr.WeRP (Reply #5)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 12:51 AM

Jul 18

So far, it sounds like Charlie Kirk is buying this scam.

And it is a scam.

47 ordered Bondi to make a futile effort to get grand jury testimony released.

She will file a motion to release grand jury testimony which will be denied because none of the exceptions to the secrecy of grand jury testimony are present here.

Furthermore, the testimony before a grand jury to get a indictments on a specific set of charges is limited in scope. Even if it were released, it would provide very little insight into the mountains of evidence uncovered in the course of the investigation.

They are gambling that they can shift "blame" to the courts: "We asked the court to release everything (ignoring the actual limited scope), it is the corrupt court that is keeping it all secret."

mzmolly

(52,388 posts)

6. Whatever is 'pertinent' per

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Thu Jul 17, 2025, 11:54 PM

Jul 17

Trump's directive. In other words, whatever doesn't apply to Trump.

johnnyfins

(2,527 posts)

7. If ever there was a time for a hero

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Thu Jul 17, 2025, 11:59 PM

Jul 17

It Is NOW.

comradebillyboy

(10,806 posts)

8. How much will Bondi fabricate?

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 12:33 AM

Jul 18

Skittles

(166,349 posts)

9. nothing about the rich pedo clients

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 12:38 AM

Jul 18

probably stuff we already know about Epstein and his gal pal

still-prayin4rain

(374 posts)

10. The transcripts are like 1% of the data in the files and the only portion that need court approval

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 12:39 AM

Jul 18

.... so not much

pat_k

(11,507 posts)

11. 47 ordered Bondi to make a futile effort to get grand jury testimony released.

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 12:46 AM

Jul 18

She will release nothing.

She will file a motion to release grand jury testimony which will be denied because none of the exceptions to the secrecy of grand jury testimony are present here.

Furthermore, the testimony before a grand jury to get a indictments on a specific set of charges is limited in scope. Even if it were released, it would provide very little insight into the mountains of evidence uncovered in the course of the investigation.

This is a scam. Pure and simple.

C_U_L8R

(47,741 posts)

13. They're playing a cute game

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 01:13 AM

Jul 18

Like three card monte. Only showing what they want, always deceiving and deflecting to make it seem like they are being open, when in fact they are the opposite.

Oh btw, your wallet is now missing.

LetMyPeopleVote

(166,992 posts)

15. Very little if anything

Reply to kennyperkins (Original post)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 08:04 PM

Jul 18

Reply to this discussion