Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MayReasonRule

(3,584 posts)
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 04:32 PM Jul 18

'How convenient': GOP just unveiled a new 'Act' to make you forget what Donald Trump and Epstein did together

https://wegotthiscovered.com/news/how-convenient-gop-just-unveiled-a-new-act-to-make-you-forget-what-donald-trump-and-epstein-did-together/

In what looks like a desperate effort to shift public focus, Republican Representative Addison McDowell of North Carolina has introduced a new bill called the “Ban on Inkless Directives and Executive Notarizations Act of 2025,” or the “BIDEN Act.”

This proposed law would ban the use of autopen machines for presidential signatures on important documents like finalized bills, executive orders, pardons, and commutations.

The act claims that only the president personally can legally sign such papers. The bill also states that any document signed in the past or future that breaks this rule would be considered invalid, as Fox News reports, as if there’s not bigger news happening with the current sitting president.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'How convenient': GOP just unveiled a new 'Act' to make you forget what Donald Trump and Epstein did together (Original Post) MayReasonRule Jul 18 OP
Right. Retroactive laws. Raven123 Jul 18 #1
Hmmm. I doubt that the current supremacist court will object though. markodochartaigh Jul 18 #2
So, I guess that would invalidate about 50 years of proclamations, pardons, and EOs. sinkingfeeling Jul 18 #3
Well, there's a whole bunch of J6 pardons right out the window. JHB Jul 18 #4

markodochartaigh

(3,443 posts)
2. Hmmm. I doubt that the current supremacist court will object though.
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 04:41 PM
Jul 18

Retroactive legislation may raise various separation-of-powers concerns. For example, in Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995), the Supreme Court held unconstitutional on separation-of-powers grounds a statute that would have required federal courts to reopen final judgments entered before its enactment because the law interfered with the judicial power to rule with finality.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11293

JHB

(37,797 posts)
4. Well, there's a whole bunch of J6 pardons right out the window.
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 05:04 PM
Jul 18

It's not as if he personally signed 1500 pardons (in one day).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'How convenient': GOP jus...