A masterpiece of ambiguity and plausible deniability.

But the most likely read is you intend that as ironic.

In which case, you seem to find it amusing that a chronologically adult man would be perving on a 16-year-old (by his stated belief) girl's legs.

Or would you like to say you really meant that literally?

Last edited Sun Jul 20, 2025, 11:45 PM - Edit history (1)

One male correspondent state that Trump appears to be ambivalent on the subject to be followed by a female correspondent stating, Dems need to be careful of jumping into the cesspool with the crazies.

N/t

Mr. Epstein entered the room, and she recalled him saying to Mr. Trump: “No, no. She’s not here for you.”

This kind of like the FBI getting 4,200 tips on Kavanaugh and doing nothing about them.

The FBI doesn’t let crimes pass without a darn good reason.



The FBI thought Russians laundering money by buying Trump properties in cash was OK, too.

Cohn taught Trump on how being evil works. Cohn a gay made a name for himself by going after
gay members of the military and the U.S. government as security risks and later was disbarred for
putting pen into a dying person’s hand and having him or her sign over their estate to him.

To Democracy, the First Amendment and We the People.

The parallels are easy to see. Cohn’s Ring to DC Madame to Jeffrey Epstein.

It’s the Ownership of Corporate McPravda that’s missing the story on purpose. All six of them.

And the next thing we knew, here comes what Poppy Doc Bush termed “the Brave New World Order Thing.”

DU’s been on the their gangster arses and their Unitary NAZI States of Earth.

Blur their faces and put out a documentary asap.

Not everyone can pay for the news.

.... if you have a subscription and want to share, click on the "share full article" with the gift box icon, right under the article subtitle. Click "copy link". You can share up to 10 articles, no paywall, per month.