No shadow docket- with 13 justices, the chief Justice can parcel out cases for initial rulings/stays/injunctions. Any unsigned rulings considered null and void.

Also, and any ruling ignoring stare decicis and overturning past precedent (such as Dobbs did) shall itself not be considered its own precedent, and no lower court shall be required to consider or follow the ruling on similar cases that may come before them.

Strict ethical rules and financial reporting requirements; any Justice not complying with the rules shall be suspended without pay or benefits for a minimum of 90 days, and the president can elevate a judge from a lower court to serve as an acting Justice for the suspension period without confirmation from the senate.

…Brown v Board of Education wouldn’t be recognized. And if Dobbs were ever to be overturned, it wouldn’t be recognized either.

I get what the goal is, just think we need to tread carefully on the idea of never overturning precedent.

But the destruction of stare decicis must be addressed.

Although it is true that the decisions often are not accompanied by a written opinion.

A written opinion should be required and signed. We deserve to at least see their work.