Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInside the chaotic review process of the Epstein and Maxwell files at the FBI (Must Read)
https://www.muellershewrote.com/p/the-epstein-cover-up-at-the-fbi*snip*
First, approximately 1,000 personnel in the Information Management Division (IMD) and the FBI New York Field Office were assigned to this task, confirming the whistleblower account made to Senator Durbins office. I can also confirm that a log exists tracking the mentions of Donald Trump in the files, and that there were approximately 100,000 files containing roughly 300,000 pages. Individual analysts were told to flag mentions of Trump by document and page number by logging them in an Excel spreadsheet, then theyd hand in their spreadsheet at the end of their (sometimes 24 or even 48-hour) shift. But its important to note that the agents were not told to flag Trump until later in a process that began mid-March.
The process of reviewing the Epstein and Maxwell files was chaotic, and the orders were constantly changing - sometimes daily. One person I spoke to on the condition of anonymity said that many agents spent more time waiting for new instructions than they did processing files. But heres what caught my attention: the files were stored on a shared drive that anyone in the division could access. Normally, access is only granted to those working on a project, but because of the hurried nature of the exercise, the usual permission restrictions were not in place. Additionally, the internal SharePoint site the bureau ended up using to distribute the files toward the end did not have the usual restricted permissions. This left the Epstein and Maxwell files open to viewing by a much larger group of people than previously thought.
Regarding the ever-changing nature of the instructions, which one source described as full panic mode, there were at least four different review instructions. Keeping in mind that the Record/Information Dissemination Section (RIDS) are trained in FOIA redactions but many in the IMD are not, there were multiple video training sessions that went out on an unclassified network on what to mark for redaction, what not to mark, and how to record things that needed to be flagged. That means that video exists of trainers explaining the process of flagging instances of Donald Trump appearing in the files, and those videos went out on unclassified networks within the bureau. Its also of note that the trainers toward the end were folks from the Department of Justice, and not the FBI.
At first, the analysts were told to mark nothing. This was roundly rejected by the analysts, who were then told to not think about it as releasing the information - including victims names - to the public, but to think about it as releasing it to the Attorney General. It was assumed that Bondi and Patel wanted all the information, including the victims names and information. Analysts were told that what would be released would be solely up to Pam Bondi. Many feared that the victims information would be released or used for nefarious purposes. Eventually, lawyers from the Department of Justice were assigned to the project to oversee what was being flagged for redaction.
*snip*
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Inside the chaotic review process of the Epstein and Maxwell files at the FBI (Must Read) (Original Post)
Nevilledog
13 hrs ago
OP
Joinfortmill
(18,573 posts)1. I see missing files coming....
usonian
(19,142 posts)2. AI will create all new ones.
Count on it.
BOSSHOG
(43,318 posts)3. I ask again
How Does one DEFAME Donald Trump?
BurnDoubt
(822 posts)4. Once again:
I DON'T TRUST YOU!!!!!