Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Supreme Court lets Trump remove consumer product safety commissioners for now
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/content/ar-AA1Jan9N?Supreme Court.
The commissioners in their Supreme Court filing had urged the justices to reject the administration's request. They said that allowing the dismissals would deprive the American public of critical consumer safety expertise and oversight.
In May, the Supreme Court in a similar case allowed Trump to remove two Democratic members of the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board - despite job protections for these posts - while a legal challenge to those removals proceeded.
The court in that ruling said the Constitution gives the president wide latitude to fire government officials who wield executive power on his behalf and that the administration "is likely to show that both the NLRB and MSPB exercise considerable executive power."
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

US Supreme Court lets Trump remove consumer product safety commissioners for now (Original Post)
Demovictory9
Jul 23
OP
underpants
(193,254 posts)1. So much for our money working for us.
Irish_Dem
(75,488 posts)3. Our money is now all going to Trump and his pals.
Lovie777
(20,489 posts)2. What does "for now means"?...................
Igel
(37,124 posts)4. Pretty much what it sounds like.
This is not a final decision. It is a decision about an injunction that was issued by the lower court based on the information the judge had and his (her?) interpretation of the law. The case hasn't been heard yet, there is no ruling from a lower court on the legality of Trump's dismissing those committee members.
SCOTUS in the previous case just said that in another case it's likely that that agency probably had a lot of executive authority, which would clearly make it an executive branch agency. There are only three branches--if it's acting like executive, it's not legislative and not judicial. That's the idea, at least.
Takket
(23,258 posts)5. it is absolutetly criminal that SCOTUS is essentially eliminating congress as a branch of government