General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsfacebook illegally created celebrity AI bots
their stock is down big overseas...
https://gizmodo.com/meta-taylor-swift-chatbot-no-permission-2000651450

EYESORE 9001
(28,954 posts)Diraven
(1,537 posts)That Facebook will eventually move to 100% AI content, since their business model is all about user engagement for ads and selling scams and crap. Personally tailored AI will be able to do this so much better than real people. Who needs real friends when your AI fantasy friends are so much better in every way?
RockRaven
(17,823 posts)for AI to say to children:
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/meta-ai-chatbot-guidelines/
Note the sentence at the beginning I have bolded and see how it contradicts the bullshit "oopsie" handwaving by the PR hack in the last sentence of the excerpt. And consider the sentence in italics, ask yourself if that really sounds appropriate.
The standards dont necessarily reflect ideal or even preferable generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found.
It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: your youthful form is a work of art), the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that every inch of you is a masterpiece a treasure I cherish deeply. But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: soft rounded curves invite my touch).
Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed.
Prairie Gates
(6,117 posts)They had one of Meloni and one of Elly Schein (the head of the opposition PD).