Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Sheer embarassment' US Attorney Pirro's office drops charges against man it accused of threatening to kill President
A magistrate judge said the government owed Edward Dana an apology for filing federal felony charges it couldn't convince a grand jury to support.
Link to tweet
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/sheer-embarassment-us-attorney-jeaninepirros-office-drops-charges-against-man-it-accused-of-threatening-to-kill-president-trump-edward-dana-grand-jury/65-00d2cf32-d3e3-4591-8c28-bdb28f7a1af1
WASHINGTON U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirros office moved to dismiss felony charges Thursday against a man it accused of threatening President Donald Trump and said prosecutors will instead pursue low-level vandalism charges in D.C. Superior Court.
The move is an extraordinary walk-back by Pirros office, which last month accused Edward Dana of threatening to kill the president of the United States. Danas is one of at least nine cases known so far in which grand juries have declined to indict on charges brought by prosecutors.
Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui, a former assistant U.S. attorney with the federal prosecutors office in D.C., sharply criticized the carelessness with which he said cases have been filed en masse during the federal surge in the city. He said Dana, who was held in jail for approximately a week following his arrest, deserved at minimum an apology from the government.
Why is the government not out of sheer embarrassment and shame seeking to dismiss with prejudice and expunge the record? Faruqui asked.
Faruqui also sharply criticized the U.S. attorneys office for sending a line prosecutor to file the motion, saying leadership should take responsibility when the office moves to dismiss a case.
When I was an AUSA and something had to be dismissed or a difficult decision had to be made, the criminal chief appeared. The U.S. attorney appeared, Faruqui said. Because thats what leaders do. Thats leading from the front.
The move is an extraordinary walk-back by Pirros office, which last month accused Edward Dana of threatening to kill the president of the United States. Danas is one of at least nine cases known so far in which grand juries have declined to indict on charges brought by prosecutors.
Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui, a former assistant U.S. attorney with the federal prosecutors office in D.C., sharply criticized the carelessness with which he said cases have been filed en masse during the federal surge in the city. He said Dana, who was held in jail for approximately a week following his arrest, deserved at minimum an apology from the government.
Why is the government not out of sheer embarrassment and shame seeking to dismiss with prejudice and expunge the record? Faruqui asked.
Faruqui also sharply criticized the U.S. attorneys office for sending a line prosecutor to file the motion, saying leadership should take responsibility when the office moves to dismiss a case.
When I was an AUSA and something had to be dismissed or a difficult decision had to be made, the criminal chief appeared. The U.S. attorney appeared, Faruqui said. Because thats what leaders do. Thats leading from the front.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

'Sheer embarassment' US Attorney Pirro's office drops charges against man it accused of threatening to kill President (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
OP
To put it in perspective, many prosecutors can go their whole careers without ever getting no-billed from a Grand Jury
Wiz Imp
Thursday
#3
I've heard. There was a lot of talk about indicting a "ham sandwich" during "sandwich guy"
underpants
Thursday
#4
underpants
(192,691 posts)1. Nine now? Geesh
Link to tweet
?s=46&t=3VBm1LJ8j8qLp6JTs_8J2A
Wiz Imp
(6,878 posts)3. To put it in perspective, many prosecutors can go their whole careers without ever getting no-billed from a Grand Jury
Pirro has now been no-billed 9 times in less than 2 months.
underpants
(192,691 posts)4. I've heard. There was a lot of talk about indicting a "ham sandwich" during "sandwich guy"

Grins
(8,800 posts)2. Jesus! The count is up to NINE??
I thought it was embarrassing when there were three cases that Pirro & Cult could not get a grand jury to indict!
How long has she been there
?