Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsX is now offering end-to-end encrypted chat -- you probably shouldn't trust it yet (TechCrunch)
https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/05/x-is-now-offering-me-end-to-end-encrypted-chat-you-probably-shouldnt-trust-it-yet/X, formerly Twitter, has started rolling out its new encrypted messaging feature called Chat or XChat.
The company claims the new communication feature is end-to-end encrypted, meaning messages exchanged on it can only be read by the sender and their receiver, and in theory no one else, including X, can access them.
Cryptography experts, however, are warning that Xs current implementation of encryption in XChat should not be trusted. Theyre saying its far worse than Signal, a technology widely considered the state of the art when it comes to end-to-end encrypted chat.
-snip-
Matthew Garrett, a security researcher who published a blog post about XChat in June, when X announced the new service and slowly started rolling it out, wrote that if the company doesnt use hardware security modules, or HSMs, to store the keys, then the company could tamper with the keys brute-forcing them for example since they are only four digits and potentially decrypt messages. HSMs are servers made specifically to make it harder for the company that owns them to access the data inside.
-snip-
The company claims the new communication feature is end-to-end encrypted, meaning messages exchanged on it can only be read by the sender and their receiver, and in theory no one else, including X, can access them.
Cryptography experts, however, are warning that Xs current implementation of encryption in XChat should not be trusted. Theyre saying its far worse than Signal, a technology widely considered the state of the art when it comes to end-to-end encrypted chat.
-snip-
Matthew Garrett, a security researcher who published a blog post about XChat in June, when X announced the new service and slowly started rolling it out, wrote that if the company doesnt use hardware security modules, or HSMs, to store the keys, then the company could tamper with the keys brute-forcing them for example since they are only four digits and potentially decrypt messages. HSMs are servers made specifically to make it harder for the company that owns them to access the data inside.
-snip-
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

X is now offering end-to-end encrypted chat -- you probably shouldn't trust it yet (TechCrunch) (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Friday
OP
chowder66
(11,220 posts)1. Yet? How about at all?
DBoon
(24,235 posts)2. THEY ONLY USE 4 DIGITS FOR KEYS?
OMG!!!
Buns_of_Fire
(18,713 posts)3. 'you probably shouldn't trust it yet'... Allow me to elaborate...
I wouldn't trust it AT ALL. XformerlyTwitter has shown its colors, and I have no intention of trusting anything ElonX is associated with - including SpaceX, StarlinkX, TeslaX, of TrumpX.