Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

surfered

(8,960 posts)
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 10:09 AM 17 hrs ago

Has the Trump Administration declared the Caribbean a Free Fire Zone?

After posting a video of an apparent war crime, the Trump Administration has ordered stealth fighters to Puerto Rico.

In Vietnam, based upon the assumption that all friendly forces had been cleared from the area, the U.S. Military Assistance Command established a policy designating "free-fire zones" as areas in which:
* Anyone unidentified is considered an enemy combatant
* Soldiers were to shoot anyone moving around after curfew without first making sure that they were hostile.

The concept of a free-fire zone does not exist in international law, and failing to distinguish between combatants and civilians is a war crime.

We could interdict suspected drug traffickers and if they resisted with armed force, we could defend ourselves; however, stealth fighters are not equipped to interdict sea going vessels. What’s the plan here? Because we cannot morally or legally just summarily blow boats out of the water.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sop

(15,820 posts)
2. Trump's and Rubio's current version of the Platt Amendment, allowing the U.S. to militarily intervene in the Caribbean.
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 10:39 AM
17 hrs ago

The Platt Amendment, introduced by Senator Orville Platt (R-Connecticut) in 1901, gave the United States the right to intervene militarily "for the preservation of Cuban independence, the maintenance of a government adequate for the protection of life, property, and individual liberty (American corporate interest$)." As a direct result of this law, the United States intervened militarily in the Caribbean dozens of times in the early 20th century alone, including occupations of Cuba, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua.

sop

(15,820 posts)
4. FDR did away with the Platt Amendment in 1934 as part of his "Good Neighbor" policy toward Latin America.
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 01:47 PM
13 hrs ago

FDR's "Good Neighbor" policy (supposedly) ended U.S. military interventionism in the Western Hemisphere, renouncing the right to intervene in the internal affairs of other nations. Roosevelt: "The definite policy of the United States from now on is one opposed to armed intervention." Cordell Hull, Roosevelt’s Secretary of State: "No state has the right to intervene in the internal or external affairs of another."

Obviously, Trump and Rubio diasagree, as have other presidents since Roosevelt. The US continues to justify military interventions in the Caribbean, claiming the need to stabilize the region, protect American economic interests and promote democracy. More recently, justifications focus on fighting drug trafficking, terrorism and human smuggling.

In Trump's mind, his bullshit designation of Tren de Aragua as a "foreign terrorist organization" provided "justification" for the lethal military action off the coast of Venezuela. Blowing up a small boat carrying eleven people, with no evidence they were involved in either narco-terrorism or human smuggling, is an act of war, and a violation of international law.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has the Trump Administrat...