Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(15,334 posts)
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:29 PM Sep 9

Duh!!!! Sharing in case anyone else was as dense as I was.

I've always felt uneasy about the use of "undocumented" instead (I thought) of "illegal." It sounded like special pleading. And then, yesterday, I put it all together. It is not "illegal" to enter the United States any way you can to claim asylum. After you've claimed asylum, you go through a process to gain, you hope, documents. Official status to remain here and, hopefully, enter a path to citizenship. So "undocumented" is, indeed, the correct term. I had all the pieces, just didn't put them together.

Now, for sure, some people that are claimin asylum are doing so illegitimately. But, until their case is heard, we don't know that.

I know most of you DUers have been clear about that all along, but maybe a few more need to hear it.

I do, though, think the law needs to be changed, or the staffing at the border for hearing cases needs to be vastly increased.

Another thing I learned. The right's resistance to "fixing" things hinges on the fact that the census counts people, not citizens. They literally do want to get rid of all those people increasing the chance of democratic congressional districts. It's not a matter of people taking jobs, or even racism. It's pure politics.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Duh!!!! Sharing in case anyone else was as dense as I was. (Original Post) LAS14 Sep 9 OP
They would be better off, concentrating on popular policies and candidates Walleye Sep 9 #1
The Democrats have been angling for increased staffing for hearing cases at the border, like forever! Sogo Sep 9 #2
There have been two or three comprehensive immigration bills over the last 15 years or so... Wounded Bear Sep 9 #10
The "illegal" appelation is considered demeaning and dehumanizing. No person is illegal. WhiskeyGrinder Sep 9 #3
Absolutely. No human is, by nature, "illegal." ananda Sep 9 #4
When I reply to white wingers on local websites, I usually say something like "Good people missing a paper or two." Silent Type Sep 9 #5
Hell, It's not just immigrants that have documentation issues, anyone with, say ADHD might not have papers.. haele Sep 9 #16
Thank you for how you explained this Bluesaph Sep 9 #6
even that isn't a criminal matter on the first offense InstantGratification Sep 9 #12
the system is broken on purpose. that's how the oligarchs want it. mopinko Sep 9 #7
There is also the Native American viewpoint Jilly_in_VA Sep 9 #8
This is so ironic, that in the beginning days of this republic, that literally everybody was undocumented, until laws, SWBTATTReg Sep 9 #9
When a foreign person is working and not reporting mdbl Sep 9 #11
Republicans do not want to count anyone who is not a citizen because it hurts Democratic representation. Lonestarblue Sep 9 #13
learning and being willing to change is a good thing. EdmondDantes_ Sep 9 #14
I agree, except for one small quibble. ShazzieB Sep 9 #15
Here is the US Citizenship and immigration Services glossary LeftInTX Sep 9 #17

Walleye

(42,528 posts)
1. They would be better off, concentrating on popular policies and candidates
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:33 PM
Sep 9

Reducing your own population is not something nation leaders should do. They stand in line they fill out forms. They go through security checks and they get a court date. I don’t see how they can keep calling them illegal.

Sogo

(6,623 posts)
2. The Democrats have been angling for increased staffing for hearing cases at the border, like forever!
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:35 PM
Sep 9

That's one of the biggest snags with getting cooperation from the Rs.

Wounded Bear

(62,983 posts)
10. There have been two or three comprehensive immigration bills over the last 15 years or so...
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 02:14 PM
Sep 9

All shot down by republicans who would rather keep the problem open and festering to use as campaign issues.

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,706 posts)
3. The "illegal" appelation is considered demeaning and dehumanizing. No person is illegal.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:35 PM
Sep 9

And even if they came in without documentation and without claiming asylum, it's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

ananda

(33,202 posts)
4. Absolutely. No human is, by nature, "illegal."
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:36 PM
Sep 9

That is calling them criminals before they've ever
committed a crime.

Silent Type

(11,189 posts)
5. When I reply to white wingers on local websites, I usually say something like "Good people missing a paper or two."
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:38 PM
Sep 9

Ticks them off.

Then, point out it's usually a misdemeanor. By then they are showing their true hatred for brown people missing a paper or two.

haele

(14,599 posts)
16. Hell, It's not just immigrants that have documentation issues, anyone with, say ADHD might not have papers..
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 03:53 PM
Sep 9

I have a job-hopping childhood friend who is in the habit of speaking with an exaggerated British Columbian accent (she thinks it's Boho Posh, her favorite style)
She's always seems to be scrambling to get a replacement Social Security card, Passport, Marriage Certificate, Divorce paperwork, Certifications and transcripts, and Diplomas whenever she gets a new job or when she has to provide identification paperwork.
She's always going to "Put them back in the family safe" but noooo - she leaves important paperwork in the car, or in her big purse after she leaves HR and goes out to lunch or dinner to celebrate, forgets about them for a few weeks, and her papers just "disappear".
The only ID I know of she hasn't lost several times over the past 45 years is her Driver's Licence.
If she gets stopped and asked for ID under the the current administration, she could be targeted as being here while Canadian...and she's a rather well off white woman.
That might spare her -now. But she's a bit of an excitable leftist, and uppity liberal citizens are next on the list.

Bluesaph

(967 posts)
6. Thank you for how you explained this
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:51 PM
Sep 9

I’ve been trying and failing to explain this in clear terms to people I debate with.

These people are not here “illegally”!!!

The only ones who legitimately are illegal are the ones who are here by overstaying their legal visas.

12. even that isn't a criminal matter on the first offense
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 02:27 PM
Sep 9

It is just a civil infraction punishable by a fine and deportation. It is only criminal the first time if done in conjunction with another offense like theft or assault.

mopinko

(72,974 posts)
7. the system is broken on purpose. that's how the oligarchs want it.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 01:10 PM
Sep 9

if they started busting ceo’s instead of peons, the profess wd b fixed almost over night. they want frightened workers.

Jilly_in_VA

(13,060 posts)
8. There is also the Native American viewpoint
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 01:11 PM
Sep 9

No one is illegal on stolen land. You could look at it that way.

SWBTATTReg

(25,708 posts)
9. This is so ironic, that in the beginning days of this republic, that literally everybody was undocumented, until laws,
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 01:48 PM
Sep 9

etc. all got updated (and yet today, repugs still won't pass a comprehensive immigration bill, for they want the issue to fester to help them in their elections).

The ultimate hypocrites.

mdbl

(7,379 posts)
11. When a foreign person is working and not reporting
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 02:21 PM
Sep 9

or they have a Visa that has expired and haven't applied for renewal, it becomes illegal.

Lonestarblue

(12,930 posts)
13. Republicans do not want to count anyone who is not a citizen because it hurts Democratic representation.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 02:32 PM
Sep 9

Six of every 10 undocumented persons lives in 20 metropolitan areas, most of them in blue states or major cities (lije Austin, Dallas, Houston) in red states. While some red areas might lose a bit of population counts, blue states and areas would lose more. The goal, as always, is to prevent democracy from functioning.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/03/11/us-metro-areas-unauthorized-immigrants/

ShazzieB

(21,622 posts)
15. I agree, except for one small quibble.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 03:39 PM
Sep 9
They literally do want to get rid of all those people increasing the chance of democratic congressional districts. It's not a matter of people taking jobs, or even racism. It's pure politics.


I'm not sure there is such a thing as "pure" politics in this instance. I think racism and politics are so inextricably intertwined here that it's not possible to completely separate them. I also don't believe they really care about people taking jobs so much as the color of those people, which brings us right back to racism.

But this is a very small quibble. On the whole, we are on exactly the same wavelength!

LeftInTX

(34,006 posts)
17. Here is the US Citizenship and immigration Services glossary
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 04:10 PM
Sep 9
https://www.uscis.gov/tools/glossary

Many of these terms have been around since the 19th century, hence common language tries to modernize it. However, when going through legal proceedings, those are the terms that are used in courts.

https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-73000-immigrant-violations-passport-and-visa#9-73.200#9-73.200
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1911-8-usc-1325-unlawful-entry-failure-depart-fleeing-immigration
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Duh!!!! Sharing in case a...