General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'It's a dead issue': Trump declines to comment on alleged Epstein letter
President Donald Trump declined to comment on the letter he allegedly signed for Jeffrey Epstein's 50th "birthday book" in 2003, calling it a "dead issue" when asked by NBC News.
"I don't comment on something that's a dead issue. I gave all comments to the staff. It's a dead issue," Trump said on Tuesday morning, according to NBC News.
On Monday, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released an image of the birthday message allegedly sent by Trump, after the panel received documents and communications from Epstein's estate.
Trump's denied writing the letter, calling it "fake" after the Wall Street Journal first reported on the alleged birthday book and the contribution from Trump in mid-July. Trump also filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the newspaper. Dow Jones, the parent company of the Journal, said it has full confidence in the accuracy of the reporting.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/dead-issue-trump-declines-alleged-155030143.html

no_hypocrisy
(53,107 posts)underpants
(193,097 posts)The Madcap
(1,471 posts)His is a "dead issue." Ask Stormy.
What a scummy liar.
JohnnyRingo
(20,164 posts)Just say Watergate is a "dead issue" and stop talking about it so it just goes away, ...Genius! The press has no choice now but to move on.
Yes Chris Hanson, I know you think I'm in this kitchen to pick up a 13 year old girl, but I think it's a dead issue so I'll be on my way. No further questions.
Aviation Pro
(14,782 posts)Is a live issue.
Fuck this enigma.
GoCubsGo
(34,335 posts)This is going to be a nightmare for you for the rest of your miserable, fucking life.
dalton99a
(90,323 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(169,983 posts)Republicans had to choose: acknowledge the letter as legitimate or insist that a Trump-signed document wasnt actually a Trump-signed document.
Thereâs an approach to reality that says a Trump-signed document isnât actually a Trump-signed document.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-09-09T13:13:45.110Z
Itâs the same approach that says job numbers are fake. And polls are fake. And election results are fake. And science is fake. And evidence of crimes is fake. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/white-house-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-book-donald-trump-rcna230024
A copy of the book submitted to Congress (which was not reviewed by MSNBC) included a typed message, inside the outline of a womans torso, that read, in part, A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday and may every day be another wonderful secret. At the bottom of the message is a signature that appears to be Donald Trumps.
The image looks like the one the Journal described in July.
BREAKING: House Oversight Committee Dems posted this photo of what appears to be Trump's birthday note to Epstein.
— MSNBC (@msnbc.com) 2025-09-08T20:02:54.216Z
Trump previously denied the note and drawing's existence. MSNBC has not independently verified the drawing. The WH has denied the signature belongs to the president.
......White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed that its very clear that Trump didnt draw the figure or sign the letter. Other White House officials pushed the same line, and true to form, several congressional Republicans soon followed, echoing the new party line.
At face value, the pushback was and is difficult to take seriously. The signature on the letter resembles other documents from that era that Trump signed.
ThAtâa nOt TrUmPâs SiGnAtUrE www.wsj.com/us-news/law/...
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-09-08T21:38:29.142Z
For that matter, its difficult to imagine how the document in question couldve been fabricated in the first place. As CNNs Aaron Blake summarized, The key fact here is that this comes from Epsteins estate. In other words, for this letter to have been fake, someone would have had to plant it in Epsteins possessions a long time ago, somehow........
Theres a quote thats often attributed to political theorist Hannah Arendt: This constant lying is not aimed at making the people believe a lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything anymore. As it happens, Arendt didnt actually say this (at least not exactly), but the quote resonates because of its salience:
Trump obviously tries to get people to believe lies all the time, but nearly as often, the president and his allies try to get people to give up on the idea that facts exist. With too many Americans, these tactics are effective, which helps explain why theyve become so common.
Norrrm
(3,009 posts)
Scrivener7
(57,220 posts)UTUSN
(75,745 posts)about him. There has already been a ton of reporting and testimony of what he's like and done, not like how he was used to in the tabloid world that he could just deny, hit and run, and lie. It's already been well exposed that HOOVER and COHN and others ran extortion empires and KRASNOV learned and does it.
There's a whole library on the HITLER era and the one on KRASNOV will challenge the sheer volume of it.
Cha
(314,461 posts)your birthday buddy, Epstein is 'dead" but you're Not.
sakabatou
(45,311 posts)bdamomma
(69,027 posts)You wish. It's not going anywhere. He's such a POS!!!
Hekate
(99,491 posts)
struggle4progress
(124,575 posts)Matt Naham
Sep 9th, 2025, 12:13 pm
... Trump threatened to sue the WSJ prior to the publication, then immediately sued the next day in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. In that lawsuit, Trump attorney Alejandro Brito alleged that reporters Khadeeja Safdar and Joseph Palazzolo made it all up and that the proof the letter was "nonexistent" was their inability or refusal to publish the letter itself ...
Trump threatened to sue the WSJ prior to the publication, then immediately sued the next day in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. In that lawsuit, Trump attorney Alejandro Brito alleged that reporters Khadeeja Safdar and Joseph Palazzolo made it all up and that the proof the letter was "nonexistent" was their inability or refusal to publish the letter itself ...
"The public revelation by the House Oversight Committee of a letter to Jeffrey Epstein apparently written and signed by Donald Trump is an enormous step forward in the Wall Street Journal's defense of the libel suit filed by Trump and a stunning blow to Trump's claim" ...
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/congressional-revelation-of-birthday-letter-to-epstein-is-a-stunning-blow-for-trump-lawsuit-against-wsj-legal-expert-says/
struggle4progress
(124,575 posts)Matthew Chapman
September 8, 2025 8:15PM ET
... "Elie, I don't know, the signature looks pretty close to Donald Trump's signature, if not exactly like Donald Trump's signature," said anchor Jake Tapper. "Maybe not the ones in the ones in the pictures that Taylor Budowich tweeted out. But here's one from, [a letter] President Trump did ... in 2015. I mean, it's pretty identical. Is this going to make Trump's defamation case against News Corp more difficult?"
"It's going to be way more difficult, Jake, now," confirmed Honig.
"If you look at Donald Trump's actual complaint here, his lawsuit, he alleges, first that the letter is, and I quote, 'nonexistent,'" said Honig. "Well, now we know that that's off the table. The letter certainly does exist. And now Trump's going to have to make a fallback argument that we're hearing that, well, maybe this is not his signature. But again, if you look back at The Wall Street Journal, they hedged on that. The original article by The Wall Street Journal does not say definitively this is his signature. In fact, the article actually says the circumstances around the creation of the letter are unclear.
"So Trump has to prove that A) the reporting was false, and that B) it was knowingly or recklessly false. And I think this was a long shot to begin with. And I think the appearance of this letter has made it even longer of a shot" ...
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-lawsuit-2673971831/#