Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMAGAt Moses Mikey's latest fatwa does little to dispel the idea that he's s squirm-inducing little boot licking creep.
Stick your "YIELD, MAN," where the sun doesn't shine, you creepy little wimp.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) sparked outrage by calling on city officials to "yield, man" to military forces deployed by President Donald Trump for purported law enforcement purposes.
The president has ordered National Guard troops to Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., and threatened to send them to Chicago as part of what he calls a nationwide crackdown on violent crime, although critics have noted the cities he's targeted are in Democratic areas with Black leadership. But Johnson argued that local officials should just submit.
"I cannot for the life of me understand how the Democrats think this is some kind of winning political message," Johnson said Tuesday. "Yield, man! Let the troops come into your city and show how crime can be reduced."
https://www.rawstory.com/mike-johnson-2673975521
The president has ordered National Guard troops to Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., and threatened to send them to Chicago as part of what he calls a nationwide crackdown on violent crime, although critics have noted the cities he's targeted are in Democratic areas with Black leadership. But Johnson argued that local officials should just submit.
"I cannot for the life of me understand how the Democrats think this is some kind of winning political message," Johnson said Tuesday. "Yield, man! Let the troops come into your city and show how crime can be reduced."
https://www.rawstory.com/mike-johnson-2673975521
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MAGAt Moses Mikey's latest fatwa does little to dispel the idea that he's s squirm-inducing little boot licking creep. (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Sep 9
OP
MaddowBlog-'Yield, man': Speaker Johnson presses Democratic-run cities to accept troop deployments
LetMyPeopleVote
Sep 9
#1
LetMyPeopleVote
(169,942 posts)1. MaddowBlog-'Yield, man': Speaker Johnson presses Democratic-run cities to accept troop deployments
If the GOP leader genuinely cant understand why local Democratic officials would resist the deployment of armed federal troops, I think I can help.
Speaker Mike Johnson says he has no idea why local Democratic officials would resist the deployment of armed troops, acting under Trumpâs directions, to address civilian street crime.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-09-09T19:17:10.198Z
I think I can help him understand. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/yield-man-speaker-johnson-presses-democratic-run-cities-accept-troop-d-rcna230146
House Speaker Mike Johnson realizes that as Donald Trump threatens to deploy troops to more American cities, local officials are not on board with the presidents agenda.
The Louisiana Republican, however, seems baffled by their perspective.
......If the GOP congressman is sincere and genuinely cannot understand why local officials would resist the deployment of armed federal troops, acting under Donald Trumps directions, to address civilian street crime, I think I can help.
.....That is, the Democratic position is the popular one, whether or not the House speaker finds this to be confusing.
The Louisiana Republican, however, seems baffled by their perspective.
Mike Johnson: "I cannot for the life of me understand how the Democrats think this is some kind of winning political message. Yield man! Let the troops come into your city and show how crime can be reduced."
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-09-09T14:40:46.870Z
......If the GOP congressman is sincere and genuinely cannot understand why local officials would resist the deployment of armed federal troops, acting under Donald Trumps directions, to address civilian street crime, I think I can help.
First, Johnson made it sound as if theres a national crime wave sweeping the nation, forcing Americans to cower in fear behind closed doors. Thats ridiculous, as the evidence shows.
Second, the crime rate in Louisiana isnt exactly worth bragging about, compared to national averages, and I havent yet seen Johnson demand the deployment of federal troops to patrol the streets of Shreveport.
Third, the idea that troop deployments necessarily eliminate crime has already been discredited, and although it might offer some temporary improvements, unless the House speaker expects to see permanent troop deployments to American municipalities from coast to coast, this isnt a serious approach to crime reduction.
Fourth, the president has already militarized Washington, D.C., and most of the residents of the nations capital overwhelmingly oppose the deployments. This probably hasnt gone unnoticed among local officials in other areas.
Fifth, it remains jarring to see far-right Republicans talk about the federal mobilization of troops on domestic soil after years of listening to other far-right Republicans describe exactly this scenario as tyrannical. Now, evidently, Johnson sees it as common sense a position he seems likely to abandon the next time theres a Democratic president.
Sixth, this isnt an all-or-nothing situation in which the administration offers Guard troops or nothing: Plenty of Democratic officials in cities nationwide would welcome increased federal support to make local streets safer, even as they resist police statestyle deployments.
Finally, even if we put all of this aside, the House speaker suggested the Democratic position is a political loser for the party. Indeed, the GOP leader explicitly said he couldnt understand how the Democrats think this is some sort of winning political message.
.....That is, the Democratic position is the popular one, whether or not the House speaker finds this to be confusing.