It is remarkably consistent and if someone went to verify it, for say an auction, you better believe they would say it's his.

No doubt what-so-ever it is 100% his signature.

I'd like to see some impartial observations.

When I was verifying signatures on ballots, all I had to do was find three points of similarity to determine a match. And there were a lot of times when it was difficult. But in the case of the Donald signatures, there are WAY more than three points of similarity. In fact there are very FEW points of dissimilarity. Donald's signature means a lot to him and so he does his best every time to make it just right. Now, it's possible that someone could have practiced and practiced, and managed to duplicate his signature. But I find it highly unlikely, less than 1/10 of 1 percent, and after the thousands of signatures I've looked at I would have to consider myself something of an expert.

It’s plainly obvious so why risk a flood of invective?

when she ran against him in 2016? Seems like that tidbit could have been exploited against him.