Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MayReasonRule

(3,769 posts)
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 04:46 PM Wednesday

0.003% 🤣🤣🤣I Almost Posted This In The Humor Section🤣🤣🤣

0.003% figure of registered voters were identified in a review as having possibly voted illegally as non-citizens in Louisiana.

. The exact number comes from an investigation by the Louisiana Secretary of State's office, announced in September 2025.
Details of the investigation:

Total suspected registrations: An initial 390 noncitizens were found to be registered to vote.

Total suspected votes: Of those, 79 individuals were identified as having voted in at least one election since the 1980s.

Percentage of voter roll: The Louisiana Illuminator reported on September 4, 2025, that the 390 suspected non-citizen voters represent approximately 0.01% of the state's roughly 2.9 million registered voters.

Proportion of actual votes: This means the 79 suspected illegal votes are less than 0.003% of the total registered voter population.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Voter roll cleanup: The Louisiana Secretary of State's office stated that the individuals in question have been or are in the process of being removed from the voter rolls.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
0.003% 🤣🤣🤣I Almost Posted This In The Humor Section🤣🤣🤣 (Original Post) MayReasonRule Wednesday OP
Thanks, you beat me to it. usonian Wednesday #1
Thank You For Posting This Within The Thread! MayReasonRule Wednesday #4
That's 30 parts per million Jerry2144 Wednesday #2
Put it on a ball cap MAGAs BOSSHOG Wednesday #3

usonian

(20,321 posts)
1. Thanks, you beat me to it.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 04:55 PM
Wednesday
https://www.npr.org/2025/09/10/nx-s1-5477367/save-election-citizenship-data-trump

The REAL reason? You guessed it.

SAVE pings a number of data sources, as opposed to being a database in and of itself. But under USCIS policy, all queries are saved for 10 years for audit purposes, so if a state runs its whole voter list through the tool, that data will remain with DHS for a decade.

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, told NPR that such a system sounded like the beginnings of a national voter registration list that would raise privacy and security concerns.

...


At a White House meeting about SAVE in late July, USCIS officials tried to reassure state voting officials about sharing sensitive voter data, according to Connecticut Secretary of State Stephanie Thomas, who attended the meeting. "They said many times like, 'Look, we know the states are in charge of elections. We don't want your data. We don't want your lists,' " Thomas recalled.

But in recent weeks, the Department of Justice has been making controversial demands to numerous states to turn over such data, including in several instances voter rolls that include personal data like driver's license numbers and partial Social Security numbers.


A good read.

Jerry2144

(2,975 posts)
2. That's 30 parts per million
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 05:04 PM
Wednesday

To put it in other terms.

30 votes out of every 1,000,000 votes was fraudulent. Unless there were votes that close where one person got 500,029 and the other got 499,971, or similar ratios, it is insignificant.

Imagine that raw data, reality itself, disproves a Republiklan talking point

BOSSHOG

(43,666 posts)
3. Put it on a ball cap MAGAs
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 05:23 PM
Wednesday

Brag about your insignificance and the reason you make noise signifying nothing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»0.003% 🤣🤣...