Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,553 posts)
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 06:11 PM Sep 10

Let nobody who posted against the extrajudicial killing of 11 Venezuelans on the boat

Let nobody who posted against the extrajudicial killing of 11 Venezuelans on the boat be ones to post anything excusing the extrajudicial killing of Charlie Kirk. Let alone the posts celebrating.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let nobody who posted against the extrajudicial killing of 11 Venezuelans on the boat (Original Post) Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 OP
Two different things. bluesbassman Sep 10 #1
Let none be above rational criticism. There was no emotion here until you introduced it, calling it "scolding". Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 #2
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. bluesbassman Sep 10 #22
Otherwise, the taste of mustard changes. Torchlight Sep 10 #3
Your post is meaningless and unrelated to this thread. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 #4
Assertions about visceral opnions are meaningless Torchlight Sep 10 #6
Nope. Context free assertions about the taste of mustard with no reference to the cases, now that's meaningless. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 #11
I'm all for not celebrating... lame54 Sep 10 #5
You have zero basis to call the OP "defending and martyr him". It is not. I am not. He is not defensible or a martyr. nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 #8
Did you post about the extrajudicial killing of 11 Venezuelans on the boat? W_HAMILTON Sep 10 #7
Yes. I posted against it. I called it extrajudicial before I saw any use of that term about it in media or on DU. . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 #9
Happen to have a link? I would use the DU search feature but it ... doesn't work so well for me, heh. W_HAMILTON Sep 10 #19
Friday Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 #20
No celebration required. Elessar Zappa Sep 10 #10
Priggish Nonsense ProfessorGAC Sep 10 #12
Do you decide, as you decided (post facto) in the case of Charlie Kirk? Do you decide against Mangione's victim? Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 #13
Not by illegal shootings. Believing that justifies rightwingers killing liberals they believe are evil. And highplainsdem Sep 10 #14
Not by political assassination Calculating Sep 10 #21
Just did a fresh rip in his honor and read that twice, still confused. Brainfodder Sep 10 #15
IMHO i would say a better analogy sarisataka Sep 10 #16
Yes. Both were politically motivated (not confirmed) murders. The Minnesota killer thought he was expunging evil. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 10 #17
+1,000,000 highplainsdem Sep 10 #18

bluesbassman

(20,320 posts)
1. Two different things.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 06:33 PM
Sep 10

The first was carried out by the US military under the full weight and authority of the Office of the President. The second appears to have been by a lone individual and we don’t have any motive yet. But you know that already. What is your true purpose in making yet another member scolding post about today’s incident?

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,553 posts)
2. Let none be above rational criticism. There was no emotion here until you introduced it, calling it "scolding".
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 06:41 PM
Sep 10

"true purpose"? Get real. My true purpose is exactly as stated in the OP.

Being a "lone individual" does not make it a cause for celebration or something to be excused.

bluesbassman

(20,320 posts)
22. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 10:17 PM
Sep 10

I found your entire OP a scold. No emotion on my part, just an observation. YMMV.

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,553 posts)
11. Nope. Context free assertions about the taste of mustard with no reference to the cases, now that's meaningless.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 06:54 PM
Sep 10

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,553 posts)
8. You have zero basis to call the OP "defending and martyr him". It is not. I am not. He is not defensible or a martyr. nt
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 06:48 PM
Sep 10

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,553 posts)
9. Yes. I posted against it. I called it extrajudicial before I saw any use of that term about it in media or on DU. . .nt
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 06:48 PM
Sep 10

W_HAMILTON

(9,535 posts)
19. Happen to have a link? I would use the DU search feature but it ... doesn't work so well for me, heh.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 08:44 PM
Sep 10

Elessar Zappa

(16,362 posts)
10. No celebration required.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 06:49 PM
Sep 10

He’s gone, big whoop, I don’t have to care. And this isn’t remotely the same as the boat incident, which was an action undertaken by our government.

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,553 posts)
13. Do you decide, as you decided (post facto) in the case of Charlie Kirk? Do you decide against Mangione's victim?
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 06:59 PM
Sep 10

Luigi Mangione thought his victim was "an enemy to everything good, and evil needed to be expunged". So he committed an extra-judicial murder using your justification.

Is it priggish to be disgusted at murder outside of the law be it on the streets of New York or at a University in Colorado? No.

highplainsdem

(58,259 posts)
14. Not by illegal shootings. Believing that justifies rightwingers killing liberals they believe are evil. And
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 07:02 PM
Sep 10

there are a lot of rightwingers who believe a lot of liberals are evil.

Brainfodder

(7,781 posts)
15. Just did a fresh rip in his honor and read that twice, still confused.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 07:03 PM
Sep 10

But I think I get ya, that boat, didn't believe his BS, so fully understand the skeptic and WAR CRIMEY adjacent grey area of a concept of wiggle room for evil people?


sarisataka

(22,000 posts)
16. IMHO i would say a better analogy
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 07:08 PM
Sep 10

Is those who posted against the murder of the Minnesota lawmakers.
To oppose that but in any way justify or excuse this murder is is hypocritical.

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,553 posts)
17. Yes. Both were politically motivated (not confirmed) murders. The Minnesota killer thought he was expunging evil. . nt
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 07:12 PM
Sep 10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let nobody who posted aga...