Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Justice Brandeis

(263 posts)
Thu Sep 11, 2025, 11:05 PM Thursday

There is no law that requires you to be sad when a bad person dies

None.

The government can't make you mourn or be sad or even be respectful. Your emotions are yours alone and not the property of the government.

Forced mourning is the stuff of dictatorships like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Iran and the old Soviet Union.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There is no law that requires you to be sad when a bad person dies (Original Post) Justice Brandeis Thursday OP
Thank you for this. johnnyfins Thursday #1
I feel very sad for his children and even his wife, although if she karynnj Thursday #2

johnnyfins

(2,832 posts)
1. Thank you for this.
Thu Sep 11, 2025, 11:19 PM
Thursday

Why do I feel so sad for Charlie Kirk, and more for his wife and kids, then? I dont agree with one fucking thing that he ever said. But I'm a dad. What the fuck?!

karynnj

(60,523 posts)
2. I feel very sad for his children and even his wife, although if she
Thu Sep 11, 2025, 11:45 PM
Thursday

agreed with everything he did or said, she would be someone I would have nothing to do with. Still neither her husband or she should be killed for their beliefs.

I understand that in respect to those mourning, the comments of most Democrats, decrying murder and hate, are the best responses. Yet as MAGA and others on the right have been almost turning him into a saint, I also understand the need of many, especially those harmed by him, of recounting the very disgusting things he has done and said.

His comments on LGBTQ+, POC, immigrants, non Christians and women are pretty bad .. in some cases evil. For anyone this is bad, but through his charisma and organization, he commands a huge megaphone. He used that megaphone to call on people to think as he does and to hate those he hates.

My thoughts stemmed from seeing 2 Facebook posts from people I know. One, was a long post that explained how he has led efforts to harass professors, who are POC or especially if they teach gender studies. Reading it he caused a lot of harm. This was posted by a distant relative of my husband's, who I almost always agree with.

The other was a video of Kirk calmly and politely proving to a questioner that Jesus was God. The person who posted that is a kind, religious woman in her 60s. In her case, she likely saw this video, hear all the comments on what a good person he was and heard NOTHING about his comments that we have all seen.

The latter one is why the former one is probably necessary because otherwise political correctness (in its real meaning) means we cede a huge number of points to MAGA. After all, in addition to raising Kirk, they are ascribing to us the blame for violent rhetoric and division while painting themselves as innocent.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There is no law that requ...