General Discussion

tblue37

(66,853 posts) Fri Sep 12, 2025, 04:30 PM 11 hrs ago

It looks like the shooter was either Republican or unaffiliated, not a Democrat or a liberal. Do you think Nancy Mace

will consider apologizing for the way she flapped her big mouth yesterday, blaming Democrats, saying they are 100% responsible?

Link to tweet

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-own-what-happened-today-nancy-mace-blames-left-for-charlie-kirk-shooting-scolds-reporter-asking-if-gop-owns-minnesota-lawmaker-shooting/ar-AA1MiKDt?ocid=BingNewsSerp

We don’t know what condition Charlie Kirk is in right now,” said Mace. "Some raging leftist lunatic put a bullet through his neck, and you want to talk about Republicans right now? No! No, not at all!”

“No, this is on — the Democrats own this. Democrats own this.” Mace interjected.

“But isn’t there a problem with political violence across the spectrum?” Nobles asked.

“Yeah, we’re talking about Charlie Kirk right now,” retorted Mace. “That’s the subject of this, that we’re talking about right now. Democrats own this, one hundred percent.”

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It looks like the shooter was either Republican or unaffiliated, not a Democrat or a liberal. Do you think Nancy Mace (Original Post) tblue37 11 hrs ago OP

LOL Skittles 11 hrs ago #1

Ha! ._. 11 hrs ago #2

That is basically "every argument I've ever had with a RWNJ online for the past 25 years" AZJonnie 11 hrs ago #3

Snort durablend 11 hrs ago #4

And she's carrying a gun.................... Lovie777 11 hrs ago #5

He wasn't a Republican rollin74 11 hrs ago #6

I said, "or unaffiliated." tblue37 10 hrs ago #8

You also said he wasn't a liberal - we don't know that. Feel Good Inc 10 hrs ago #9

Oh stop, we 100% know he wasn't a liberal obamanut2012 10 hrs ago #11

How do you know this? Feel Good Inc 9 hrs ago #13

This message was self-deleted by its author liberalmuse 10 hrs ago #12

And no one can provide proof of these statements. Feel Good Inc 9 hrs ago #14

Who the hell is Nancy Mace? and why should anyone care what she thinks? Number9Dream 11 hrs ago #7

MAGA and a Groyper -- ultra rightwing obamanut2012 10 hrs ago #10

That's a rhetorical question, right? n/t yellow dahlia 7 hrs ago #15

I assume we will know more about him Johonny 7 hrs ago #16

Skittles

(167,241 posts)

1. LOL

Reply to tblue37 (Original post)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 04:31 PM

11 hrs ago

that would require HONOR

so, HELL FUCKING NO

._.

(1,575 posts)

2. Ha!

Reply to tblue37 (Original post)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 04:34 PM

11 hrs ago

Not just Republican, Utah MORMON Republican. And brother, it don't get more Republican than that.. !

AZJonnie

(1,399 posts)

3. That is basically "every argument I've ever had with a RWNJ online for the past 25 years"

Reply to tblue37 (Original post)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 04:35 PM

11 hrs ago

in one convenient, illustrative nutshell

They DO NOT DO intellectual integrity. In fact, they do not even understand the concept.

In the entire 25, over 1000's of conversations, not once have I seen the words "you make a good/interesting point" or "I hadn't though of it that way". Even though I'm very, very sure I make good points along these lines all the damn time. Once they decide on their angle and express it in a conversation, that is it. They will stick to it like a dog with a bone, and "debating" is completely futile and pointless.

durablend

(8,489 posts)

4. Snort

Reply to tblue37 (Original post)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 04:38 PM

11 hrs ago

She's too busy moving the goalposts to apologize

Lovie777

(20,100 posts)

5. And she's carrying a gun....................

Reply to tblue37 (Original post)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 04:39 PM

11 hrs ago

rollin74

(2,220 posts)

6. He wasn't a Republican

Reply to tblue37 (Original post)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 04:40 PM

11 hrs ago

his voter registration record shows that he was an inactive voter with no party affiliation

tblue37

(66,853 posts)

8. I said, "or unaffiliated."

Reply to rollin74 (Reply #6)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 04:56 PM

10 hrs ago

Feel Good Inc

(57 posts)

9. You also said he wasn't a liberal - we don't know that.

Reply to tblue37 (Reply #8)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 05:04 PM

10 hrs ago

He could be a conservative. He could be an unaffiliated liberal. He could be completely apolitical. All we know is that he didn't vote last November.

obamanut2012

(28,800 posts)

11. Oh stop, we 100% know he wasn't a liberal

Reply to Feel Good Inc (Reply #9)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 05:09 PM

10 hrs ago

Groyper, Magt, etc. We knew it already, but Fuentes' recent freakout telling his people to not shoot anyone puts the nail in that coffin.

Feel Good Inc

(57 posts)

13. How do you know this?

Reply to obamanut2012 (Reply #11)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 06:30 PM

9 hrs ago

Fuentes freaks out all the time. That's his whole schtick. And how would he know unless he had some personal connection to the shooter and if he did, then there's likely to be a bigger shit-storm awaiting him.

But it just sounds like to me, from everything I've read, the dude was terminally online. But there's been no comment, no statement, no post, no manifesto, no YouTube video or Facebook Like or Instagram follow that sheds any light into what he thought politically - whether he was left, right or center.

Response to Feel Good Inc (Reply #9)

liberalmuse This message was self-deleted by its author.

Feel Good Inc

(57 posts)

14. And no one can provide proof of these statements.

Reply to liberalmuse (Reply #12)

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 06:34 PM

9 hrs ago

Which is wild because this place was losing their shit yesterday when everyone was accusing him of being a leftist without proof.

How do you know he was alt-right? You're emphatic with the claim so I'm guessing something came out that proves he's alt-right. A statement or a post he made on Facebook or his reddit account or twitter account ... so, can you share that information with?