Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Aviation Pro

(15,047 posts)
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 05:18 PM Nov 5

My Spidey senses are acting up

The blow out wipe out we saw yesterday tells me that there was a lot of fucking around with the vote in 2024.

A lot.

153 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My Spidey senses are acting up (Original Post) Aviation Pro Nov 5 OP
No I think Americans got a wake up call Bluestocking Nov 5 #1
Correct. The facts of 2025 trump the propaganda of 2024. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 5 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author off-the-clock Thursday #126
Disagree. NoRethugFriends Nov 5 #5
My theory is they don't fuck with the special elections and off-year elections, because yellow dahlia Nov 5 #19
Or did Musk tell dumpie he wasn't going to help him anymore? KS Toronado Nov 5 #40
Another possibility. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #42
Oh absolutely PatSeg Nov 5 #50
We don't get to "rest easy" for awhile. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #63
Yes and once we are back in power, PatSeg Nov 5 #75
Yes! yellow dahlia Nov 5 #77
For sure! Chemical Bill Nov 5 #64
Yes, the whole voter suppression PatSeg Nov 5 #76
This is is why I feel like we have to start today, preparing people to vote Alice B. Thursday #95
Why didn't they fix the Lake/Gallego race in AZ? BannonsLiver Nov 5 #58
Because they had facts this time they didn't have last time. Bernardo de La Paz Thursday #84
Agreed. It was a real confluence of bad stuff Hekate Nov 5 #3
I agree, just like there was in 2020 obamanut2012 Nov 5 #4
And we know they tried. Chemical Bill Nov 5 #65
Here's some data Richluu Nov 5 #6
not really data, but a complicated theory... and if Musk had this magic control LymphocyteLover Friday #148
Honestly I'd point fingers at Texas and Florida for starters. Initech Nov 5 #7
you'd have to be a damn fool to think NJCher Nov 5 #8
"They lost because I wasn't on the ballot" tinrobot Nov 5 #14
Yep Blue_Roses Nov 5 #21
That is my assumption... returnee Thursday #88
Vote tampering ms.pamela Nov 5 #9
I'd like to see voting machines made illegal KS Toronado Nov 5 #56
I agree. but... returnee Thursday #89
That was always obvious. ananda Nov 5 #10
Absolutely Chemical Bill Nov 5 #11
But they just forgot to steal a single race this time? tritsofme Nov 5 #12
It would be hard to cover up in elections of this nature IMHO. n/t rzemanfl Nov 5 #15
Polls showed a close election in New Jersey, Virginia AG race too. Why not steal one? tritsofme Nov 5 #17
Out of 50 states, how many had elections yesterday? rzemanfl Nov 5 #25
33 states had elections yesterday. Wiz Imp Nov 5 #32
Many. There were a lot of local elections. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #33
Why are you asking Democrats? Chemical Bill Nov 5 #30
I'm just asking folks choosing to push ridiculous Trump-style conspiracy theories. tritsofme Nov 5 #36
Yeah, Chemical Bill Nov 5 #66
There were no national elections. hurple Nov 5 #20
So they can steal the presidency but not a Virginia AG race? Pretty lousy supervillains. tritsofme Nov 5 #22
I know, right? It's clear that it's not just MAGAs who are capable of convincing themselves Wiz Imp Nov 5 #27
What's in it for the supervillains to have the AG of Virginia in their camp? rzemanfl Nov 5 #29
The focus on Republicans being massively unpopular losers isn't exactly good for business. tritsofme Nov 5 #35
A Republican AG n Virginia could effectively block a lot of progressive legislation which Wiz Imp Nov 5 #49
I think you are giving this Republican AG magical powers. rzemanfl Nov 5 #71
Yes. That is my theory. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #34
eLoon got what he wanted, no need to help this time ecstatic Thursday #82
Not close enough tintinvotes Thursday #85
Sounds like many have adopted Trump's axiom as their own, that elections are only legitimate when I win. tritsofme Thursday #86
Not worth the risk of detection; plus maintain illusion of democracy. Possible. Nt lostnfound Thursday #122
It's being discussed here, in a public forum. Why would detection be a concern in your conspiracy theory? tritsofme Thursday #125
You misunderstood me and misrepresent my POV in last paragraph "as a vicious attack" lostnfound Friday #135
Don't you hate it when people put words in your mouth? yellow dahlia Friday #141
The judge's ruling in the Rockland County 2024 election fraud case is due before 11/11. in2herbs Nov 5 #13
Mine too, for a different reason. The more it looks like the US is turning on the WH and GOP, the more wiggs Nov 5 #16
Yes Blue_Roses Nov 5 #18
Yep. It was stolen by the muskrat... MaeScott Nov 5 #23
Then why didn't those same people "fuck around with the vote" this year? Wiz Imp Nov 5 #24
How do you know they didn't? Chemical Bill Nov 5 #31
OMG. I can't believe I'm reading such nonsense here. Wiz Imp Nov 5 #44
It's just difficult for me to accept that folks can be that plain stupid. tritsofme Nov 5 #55
I think it comes from people who can't wrap their heads around how much the country had soured on incumbents last year. BannonsLiver Nov 5 #59
there is also a basic inability (unwillingness) for people to admit stopdiggin Thursday #102
Proof of a declaration is immaterial? Chemical Bill Nov 5 #62
Yes. Virtually any declaration issuing forth from THIS individual stopdiggin Thursday #97
It is more difficult to pull off in the off-year and smaller elections, and special elections. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #41
No. Absolutely not. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 5 #26
Voting machines were compromised. Blue Full Moon Nov 5 #48
I'm sorry, but I'm going with "our elections are honest." PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 5 #54
Have you read The Conyers Report? Chemical Bill Nov 5 #67
I'm with you. A lot! yellow dahlia Nov 5 #28
So elections are only rigged when Democrats lose? Wiz Imp Nov 5 #46
I don't think Dems cheat. And, Trump ALWAYS cheats Joinfortmill Thursday #106
Right. You could begin every sentence with Trump always cheats. yellow dahlia Friday #142
Agree Blue Full Moon Nov 5 #37
I'm persuaded by Greg Palast's work: markodochartaigh Nov 5 #38
Or it could be that voters in these states got a wake up call over the last few months fujiyamasan Nov 5 #39
I was thinking the same goddamned thing Blue Owl Nov 5 #43
Is this being reported by the media? NoNameGranny Nov 5 #45
People where just angry at Trump/ICE/Gop's bs SunImp Nov 5 #47
It's worth pointing out again that 2024 election denialism is actually a vicious attack on Kamala Harris and the entire tritsofme Nov 5 #51
Off year elections would serve as pacification for anyone thinking the general elections contain malware ffr Nov 5 #52
No RandySF Nov 5 #53
Harris won. End of story. Botany Nov 5 #57
There definitely were massive voter suppression efforts, massive propaganda operations LymphocyteLover Nov 5 #61
The vote flipping and deletions was done not at the precinct levels of which you are right would be unwork-... Botany Nov 5 #70
you don't think anyone in the secretary of Dem state offices of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania LymphocyteLover Nov 5 #74
Good questions, Botany Thursday #91
couldn't that surge just be actual voters (since more Repubs tend to vote on election day)? LymphocyteLover Friday #132
A large surge of red voters from a large strongly blue voting population @ the last minute? Please. Botany Friday #134
All the obvious anecdotes match up to all the simple math. yellow dahlia Friday #143
A simple bell shaped curve for statical analysis will easily show causality behind the election results. Botany Saturday #150
There you go! Seems simple when you look at the mathematical models. yellow dahlia Saturday #152
please provide a specific example of that kind of red surge in a blue area LymphocyteLover Friday #147
You think someone from the sos office at the state level looks at every precinct result to see if it matches? questionseverything Thursday #120
No, but wouldn't someone at the county level do that? Or are they in on the plot? LymphocyteLover Friday #131
I sorry. But it NEVER happened. stopdiggin Thursday #98
I hear you... Chemical Bill Nov 5 #69
Musk had the technology. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #79
this is repeated by a lot of people that have no idea what the 'technology' is stopdiggin Thursday #103
. Chemical Bill Thursday #112
are you offering this as some species of 'evidence'? stopdiggin Thursday #119
Perhaps you stopped reading... Chemical Bill Thursday #123
Yawn. It really isn't worth my good time. (while repeating, "this is evidence ..?" ) - -(nt)- stopdiggin Thursday #124
Interesting. Chemical Bill Friday #140
Any election Democrats lose is rigged. iemanja Nov 5 #60
Pretty tiring isn't it? fujiyamasan Thursday #83
it's just plain sad. !!! - -(nt)- stopdiggin Thursday #100
. Chemical Bill Thursday #116
I dunno Cirsium Nov 5 #68
Agree. MorbidButterflyTat Nov 5 #72
They will intensify efforts to disenfranchise... WestMichRad Nov 5 #73
In '26, and '28 we need the brightest, wileyest White Hat Hackers keeping all eyes on the votes & totals, tabulaters etc electric_blue68 Nov 5 #78
Yes. yellow dahlia Thursday #111
my theory AncientOfDays Thursday #80
Exactly. yellow dahlia Thursday #113
DITTO!! BadGimp Thursday #81
They've proved it already but have trouble selling it SupportSanity Thursday #87
My gut's about the same Torchlight Thursday #90
Based on what? themaguffin Thursday #92
The economy is being wrecked, people feel it. BlueTsunami2018 Thursday #93
Why didn't fElon help this time? Clouds Passing Thursday #94
I don't think so. It just took a year or two of Trump in full swing to get out the vote, and persuade even many Martin68 Thursday #96
I'm sorry - but it NEVER happened. And your twitchy 'senses' are leading you astray. stopdiggin Thursday #99
I thought so too. I felt that way after Pennsylvania and Michigan went to Trump. It doesn't make sense. OLDMDDEM Thursday #101
Like in 2024 obnoxiousdrunk Thursday #104
Yup. Joinfortmill Thursday #105
Same thing happened 8 years ago krawhitham Thursday #107
And then they forget how bad he is? n/t Chemical Bill Friday #130
Eforensic analysis says something aint right angryxyouth Thursday #108
So since this is all so clearly documented and proven, you must be accusing Kamala of knowing tritsofme Thursday #117
Yes I am angryxyouth Friday #136
At least you're honest, this contempt and hatred for Harris and Democrats appears widespread among election deniers tritsofme Friday #137
Sometimes the truth hurts angryxyouth Monday #153
Yes. "They" use Russian-type psy-ops to convince people not to question elections, yellow dahlia Friday #144
Don't worry. Most of us realize that this is in NO way an attack on Dems. yellow dahlia Thursday #121
It is absolutely a vicious attack on Democrats. You must believe truly terrible things about Kamala Harris and Democrats tritsofme Friday #133
The problem is the premise is flawed fujiyamasan Friday #145
Interestingly... Chemical Bill Friday #146
That's one way to look at it, and I believe it to be true jmowreader Thursday #109
Right. The analysis is easy. yellow dahlia Thursday #114
Wonder why trump and Elon didn't hack Tuesday's election? Silent Type Thursday #110
Not worth it jmowreader Thursday #115
Didn't happen in 2024 either. We lost. Was hoping Conspiracy Theories would stop, but nope. Silent Type Thursday #118
Exactly. Analysis needs to be applied to the circumstances at the moment. yellow dahlia Friday #138
I absolutely think that 2024 was stolen Metaphorical Thursday #127
So simple and so obvious. yellow dahlia Friday #139
Republicans are saying the same thing about Tuesday Polybius Friday #128
you'd be surprised just how much sexism / racism played into it Skittles Friday #129
Does that same logic apply to the 2010 elections? EdmondDantes_ Friday #149
Alot! Clouds Passing Saturday #151

Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #2)

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
19. My theory is they don't fuck with the special elections and off-year elections, because
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:29 PM
Nov 5

it is more difficult to sway the smaller elections. Too much visibility. More scrutiny is possible.

Plus - I always believe it is harder to fuck with a mandate.

KS Toronado

(22,015 posts)
40. Or did Musk tell dumpie he wasn't going to help him anymore?
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:56 PM
Nov 5

They did have some kind of "falling out".

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
42. Another possibility.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:58 PM
Nov 5

But I believe we need to keep our antennae up for 2026 and 2028.

"They" will try and hold on to power at all costs.

PatSeg

(51,448 posts)
50. Oh absolutely
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:13 PM
Nov 5

We can't complacently sit back on our laurels because of one successful election cycle, as republicans will pull out every resource they can to defeat us next time. As such, I am not celebrating until congress is in Democratic control with big majorities.

I never underestimate republicans' ability to cheat. For these people, all that matter is winning and winning by any means necessary.

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
63. We don't get to "rest easy" for awhile.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 08:01 PM
Nov 5

There is much to do to establish the framework of free and fair elections.

PatSeg

(51,448 posts)
75. Yes and once we are back in power,
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 11:02 PM
Nov 5

Democratic lawmakers need to really go to work on all kinds of legislation to prevent such abuses of power, starting with new and more effective voters' rights.

Chemical Bill

(2,988 posts)
64. For sure!
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 08:06 PM
Nov 5

I don't think they've stopped thinking of the "birth certificate to vote" thing. They could kick millions of women off of the voter roles just before an election....

Alice B.

(666 posts)
95. This is is why I feel like we have to start today, preparing people to vote
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 09:57 AM
Thursday

… under the worst case scenarios.

BannonsLiver

(20,089 posts)
58. Why didn't they fix the Lake/Gallego race in AZ?
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:54 PM
Nov 5

That was pretty high profile in a prez election year. The reality is these are good yarns but don’t really add up to much.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
84. Because they had facts this time they didn't have last time.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 01:33 AM
Thursday

We had sufficient facts last time with our superior reasoning abilities (if you believe that hubris i have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale).

They did not have sufficient facts last time because they were hoodwinked by propaganda and prejudice (they don't like non-whites and women so much).

The facts available now are kind of overwhelming.

Hekate

(100,129 posts)
3. Agreed. It was a real confluence of bad stuff
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 05:30 PM
Nov 5

A certain number of voters were persuaded to vote for Trump, and I think they’ve had time to reconsider their folly. But even more is his usual “every accusation is a confession” — he TOLD us his intentions were to make votes come out in his favor, no matter what.

Richluu

(142 posts)
6. Here's some data
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 05:56 PM
Nov 5

thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-they-didnt-just-change-the?fbclid=IwY2xjawK-Q-RleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHl8PQYh9WG-6uuPXYQO5BzrEiJv9VweTkJc6a-VHicPxurAtcP4Q059t4Gjo_aem_HoFB_uGcaEjb3ciZ62ggmA

LymphocyteLover

(9,025 posts)
148. not really data, but a complicated theory... and if Musk had this magic control
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 08:04 PM
Friday

why didn't he use it this time?

Initech

(106,872 posts)
7. Honestly I'd point fingers at Texas and Florida for starters.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:00 PM
Nov 5

We know Ken Paxton deliberately sabotaged the vote in Texas in 2020. He faced ZERO punishment for it because he had help from his real employers, Fox News.

The psychos that are interfering with our election, along with the 800 pound malignant tumor in DC known as the Heritage Foundation, have some serious 'splaining to do.

NJCher

(41,967 posts)
8. you'd have to be a damn fool to think
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:01 PM
Nov 5

trump had one honest transaction in his life--the election.

The thought he ever did anything without cheating is absurd.

Your spidey sense is on target.

tinrobot

(11,870 posts)
14. "They lost because I wasn't on the ballot"
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:15 PM
Nov 5

Translates to:

"They lost because I didn't cheat for them"

ms.pamela

(66 posts)
9. Vote tampering
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:04 PM
Nov 5

Damn right there was, my husband and I we just discussing that last night and Musk admitted to it several times. The polls were not wrong in 2024; the electronic voting tabulation was undermined by tech crooks. The evidence is there and when the democrats take back power, they better put it out there and not screw around like Garland did.

KS Toronado

(22,015 posts)
56. I'd like to see voting machines made illegal
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:44 PM
Nov 5

every State mails ballots out and you mail them back or physically take them to the election office.
Computer hackers are smart and are getting smarter every day, take them out of the equation.

returnee

(730 posts)
89. I agree. but...
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 07:39 AM
Thursday

…the Dems risk not taking back power without addressing the vote count manipulation elephant in the room.

Chemical Bill

(2,988 posts)
11. Absolutely
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:12 PM
Nov 5

Repigs couldn't cheat enough this time. I expect they will redouble their efforts for next year. We'll see some close shaves that allow them to retain too many Senate and House seats. Real results should be 2/3rds majorities in both.

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
17. Polls showed a close election in New Jersey, Virginia AG race too. Why not steal one?
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:27 PM
Nov 5

Or both?

Just goes to show how 2024 election denialism is pure nonsense.

rzemanfl

(31,032 posts)
25. Out of 50 states, how many had elections yesterday?
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:35 PM
Nov 5

I can think of New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Mississippi, and the ballot measure in California.

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
33. Many. There were a lot of local elections.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:50 PM
Nov 5

I heard today that there were a total of over 400 different races, and Repugs won in only 11 of those elections.

I just found this. Apparently 29 states had elections. According to ballotpedia there were approx 800 different elections.
https://news.ballotpedia.org/2025/11/05/a-look-at-yesterdays-election-results/

hurple

(1,348 posts)
20. There were no national elections.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:29 PM
Nov 5

So they just didn't care enough. Or, they couldn't do it on that level. They likely needed the high vote numbers (millions) to cover up the subterfuge.

Wiz Imp

(8,081 posts)
27. I know, right? It's clear that it's not just MAGAs who are capable of convincing themselves
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:36 PM
Nov 5

that ridiculous conspiracy theories are true.

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
35. The focus on Republicans being massively unpopular losers isn't exactly good for business.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:51 PM
Nov 5

Especially if Elon can be commanded to flip a switch and bring their guys to victory.

Wiz Imp

(8,081 posts)
49. A Republican AG n Virginia could effectively block a lot of progressive legislation which
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:10 PM
Nov 5

will be enacted by the large Democratic majority in the House of delegates along with the state Senate majority with a Democratic Governor and Lieutenant Governor.

ecstatic

(34,977 posts)
82. eLoon got what he wanted, no need to help this time
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 12:46 AM
Thursday

Especially after being threatened with deportation.

Right now, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when p25 is going to release the epstein files and push tRump out the way for good.

tintinvotes

(108 posts)
85. Not close enough
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 01:40 AM
Thursday

The cheating only works when it's a close election. They tried rigging Obama's elections as well, but the margins were too big. Remember Carl Rove being dumbfounded about Obama winning OH, he said it was impossible even though a lot of polls had him winning.

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
86. Sounds like many have adopted Trump's axiom as their own, that elections are only legitimate when I win.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 07:06 AM
Thursday

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
125. It's being discussed here, in a public forum. Why would detection be a concern in your conspiracy theory?
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 09:17 PM
Thursday

You folks claim that there is undeniable proof posted publicly laying out beyond a shadow of a doubt that the election was stolen that any reasonable person would be convinced by.

Which means you are accusing Kamala Harris and Democratic leaders of just being too dumb and incompetent to consume publicly available information that contains incontrovertible proof of a stolen election.

Or is it that they are fully aware the election was stolen and just choose to say nothing about it for whatever reason?

These election denial conspiracy theories are beyond nonsensical, and actually represent vicious attacks on the Democratic Party.

lostnfound

(17,290 posts)
135. You misunderstood me and misrepresent my POV in last paragraph "as a vicious attack"
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 10:34 AM
Friday

Klobuchar, Reed, Warner and Peters had concerns that election equipment does not have adequate security.
https://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2019/3/ranking-members-klobuchar-warner-reed-and-peters-press-election-equipment-manufacturers-on-security

I don’t know who you think I am, part of some nebulous group of “you folks”. I’m just a g-d- person who has been here for 20 years and who has donated thousands to Democratic campaigns and knocked on doors as well. So don’t lump me together with those who do “vicious attacks on Democratic Party.”

Unlike a lot of people, I appreciate and support a broad range of Democrats from AOC to Spanberger to Booker to Newsom to Schiff to Porter not to mention the frankly-divine Obamas and the always-decent Biden and every single one of the signers of the Klobuchar letter. Diversity is strength.

As far as Kamala Harris, i attended her rally here; she fought hard in her campaign; and she was utterly shocked at the loss. I have no problems with her choices or her character; I sure as hell think she is NOT dumb and NOT incompetent. So don’t put words in my mouth about her.

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
141. Don't you hate it when people put words in your mouth?
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 04:18 PM
Friday

I feel that it is very unDU-like.

I hate to see folks misconstrue or distort the thoughtful analysis of others. IMHO, also not very DU-like.

in2herbs

(4,065 posts)
13. The judge's ruling in the Rockland County 2024 election fraud case is due before 11/11.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:14 PM
Nov 5

Last edited Sun Nov 9, 2025, 06:37 PM - Edit history (1)

wiggs

(8,552 posts)
16. Mine too, for a different reason. The more it looks like the US is turning on the WH and GOP, the more
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:23 PM
Nov 5

twitchy, angry, and desperate TSF's disordered brain gets. His limitations and disorders are a major problem (not discussed at all in MSM, BTW) for us and -- facing humiliation and defeat -- for him personally. There's no guessing what he'll do except that we know it will be outrageous and without careful consideration.

But also we shouldn't forget that recent elections matter globally, and those autocrats and oligarchs and multi multi billionaires who have invested in and joined with TSF will push buttons, pull levers, whisper in TSF's ear...they won't give up on 50 years of planning and spending.

Chemical Bill

(2,988 posts)
31. How do you know they didn't?
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:44 PM
Nov 5

Have you seen hand counted recounts of yesterday's elections? Where is your proof?

Wiz Imp

(8,081 posts)
44. OMG. I can't believe I'm reading such nonsense here.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:03 PM
Nov 5

Sure, Republicans fucked with the elections on November 4, 2025, but they were so incompetent that they were unable to win a single "competitive" type election in the entire United States. But those same evil geniuses stole the Presidential election in 2024 without bothering to rig dozens of House and Senate seats which could have given them super majorities in both chambers and left Democrats completely powerless to stop anything. Wow!

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
55. It's just difficult for me to accept that folks can be that plain stupid.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:24 PM
Nov 5

At least on our side.

It’s got to be some sort of joke and we’re just not in on it…right?

BannonsLiver

(20,089 posts)
59. I think it comes from people who can't wrap their heads around how much the country had soured on incumbents last year.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:58 PM
Nov 5

We all see Biden in a much more positive light than those who aren’t invested in the day to day tribal stuff. The foundation of these theories are based on a complete lack of understanding of that unfortunate reality. Inflation was up. Biden’s last year was chaotic. Trump was able to take advantage of culture war issues. The end.

stopdiggin

(14,693 posts)
102. there is also a basic inability (unwillingness) for people to admit
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 12:30 PM
Thursday

just how sh*tty their neighbors are willing to be when approaching the polling station.

"The American people would never ..."
YES! Yes they would! And they keep proving it to you!
But it's still hard for people to wrap their heads around. No, sorry - but a lot of people out there are just enormous dicks!

stopdiggin

(14,693 posts)
97. Yes. Virtually any declaration issuing forth from THIS individual
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 11:44 AM
Thursday

should be accorded approximately the same weight (perhaps a little less?) as those of a patent medicine salesman.

They lie, and pontificate on such blatant falsehood - on such a routine basis - that I am surprised the subject must even be broached.

"proof of declaration"
Oh, lord ....... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
41. It is more difficult to pull off in the off-year and smaller elections, and special elections.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:56 PM
Nov 5

Too much visibility on each locality. It is easier to have more scrutiny.

Plus - I always say it is more difficult to fuck with things when there is a clear mandate.

Others on this thread have offered similar logical explanations.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(28,302 posts)
26. No. Absolutely not.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:36 PM
Nov 5

Perhaps once every couple of years or so, someone manages to vote illegally. Meanwhile, more than 99% of ballots are voted legally, by people who are registered to vote. The simple system of telling your name, and date of birth and then signing the book is more than sufficient.

I'm finding it outrageous that people here on DU keep on trying to make the election illegitimate.

Blue Full Moon

(3,006 posts)
48. Voting machines were compromised.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:10 PM
Nov 5

Trump and Musk both admitted it. James Baker used the example of casino slot machines of insider tampering. So happens the casino he referenced was Trump's. Mike Lindell admitted to buying a program for the EVMs. One of his guys got caught in Mesa County. One of the Mesa County election officials was sentenced to jail. She gave the guy her access card. They said it was to prove 2020 big lie. Lindell bought that program to install. Testified in court to that. There's no way it was only the one case. That is the one that got caught. The slot machines use the same platform as the voting machines. China gave Ivanka electronic voting machines. That includes the schematics and programs. Thank you Musk with your help with the counting computers (tabulators). Then there is this gem from Musk "Anything can be hacked."

PoindexterOglethorpe

(28,302 posts)
54. I'm sorry, but I'm going with "our elections are honest."
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:21 PM
Nov 5

Plus, Elon Musk simply isn't the smartest genius ever, but people, especially here, seem to think he is.

And if they are so good tampering with machines and stealing votes, I guess all the Republicans won their elections, right? So I guess my local paper got it all wrong that Democrats won big.

Chemical Bill

(2,988 posts)
67. Have you read The Conyers Report?
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 08:18 PM
Nov 5

It's subtitle is What Went Wrong In Ohio. It examines the 2004 election. You might want to read it.

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
28. I'm with you. A lot!
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:39 PM
Nov 5

Velshi was on the big board last night, and he showed the comparisons of margins to Harris and to Biden. When I saw those numbers and trends, I felt - another example of why the accepted "result" for 2024 doesn't make sense.

My spidey senses acted up in real time in both 2024 and 2016. There has been a lot of affirming data for 2024.

I wish there had been paper ballot recounts for both 2024 and 2016. Jumping in front of the naysayers - in 2016 there was one re-add of machine counts...no hand recount of paper ballots.



I wish there were a spidey sense classic smilie.

Wiz Imp

(8,081 posts)
46. So elections are only rigged when Democrats lose?
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:06 PM
Nov 5

Be careful. You're sounding an awful lot like the other side.

markodochartaigh

(4,615 posts)
38. I'm persuaded by Greg Palast's work:
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:55 PM
Nov 5
https://www.gregpalast.com/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won/



Edit: With one caveat. The real problem is our electorate. A candidate like Trump should never have been able to get more than 5% of the vote.

fujiyamasan

(948 posts)
39. Or it could be that voters in these states got a wake up call over the last few months
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 06:56 PM
Nov 5

And they liked the candidates democrats nominated.

Trump wasn’t on the ballot, so his cult didn’t show up to the polls.

Blue Owl

(57,890 posts)
43. I was thinking the same goddamned thing
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:01 PM
Nov 5

Muskrat and Dump STOLE 2024 from Kamala. Since then they have done nothing to dissuade anyone that they are THIEVES who are willing to steal from the poorest of us so what the fuck would stop these sociopathic psychos???

NoNameGranny

(14 posts)
45. Is this being reported by the media?
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:04 PM
Nov 5

Should be the #1 topic in the news cycle! Is this an indication about how the mid-terms will go?

Dominion Voting Systems sold to company run by former Republican election official - ABC News https://share.google/XXWhxVXd2e0ykPM6N

SunImp

(2,583 posts)
47. People where just angry at Trump/ICE/Gop's bs
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:07 PM
Nov 5

The No Kings protests & the like helped keep momentum/anger up against the fascists too. Maga just didn't like their candidates this time

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
51. It's worth pointing out again that 2024 election denialism is actually a vicious attack on Kamala Harris and the entire
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:14 PM
Nov 5

leadership of the Democratic Party.

If you believe these nonsense conspiracy theories, you must believe one of two things about Kamala Harris and the entire Democratic Party apparatus

That Harris and Democratic leaders are fully aware the election was stolen from us, and have for whatever reason, decided to say nothing, making them complicit in a “cover-up”

Or you are accusing Harris and Democrats of being just too stupid and ignorant to figure it out themselves, despite (what you consider to be) convincing evidence in the public domain clearly documenting this “election theft”

To attack the character of Harris and Democrats in this manner, just to prop up a nonsense conspiracy theory in order to preserve some alternate reality, really is quite sick.

ffr

(23,309 posts)
52. Off year elections would serve as pacification for anyone thinking the general elections contain malware
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:16 PM
Nov 5

Because how could the same voting machine remove 10% of the registered voters during one election, but not the other? That is, unless the malware has date criteria. In which case, it allows for normal election results in less important elections, but when it comes to presidential elections, those are important. Removing 10% of the democratic voters should be just enough to get in some anti-American candidate, like Krasnov, let him stack the courts with more anti-American Russian assets, and win enough races to give such a stooge complete control of the government.

Botany

(75,852 posts)
57. Harris won. End of story.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:50 PM
Nov 5

Musk, and his doge boys were deleting and or flipping millions of Harris votes via firmware
patches put onto the Central Tabulators and Operating Systems of E.S.&S. and Dominion
Voting Systems and at the end of the day it looked like Harris just didn’t get the voter turn out
but she did and Peter Thiel’s Palantir was running a clean up program called “Digital Janitor”
that didn’t flip or delete votes but hide that is what happened. Musk turned on 265 low earth
orbit satellites on Oct. 30, 24 that used Starlink’s D.T.C. (direct to cell) to be in communications with
the firmware patches that were put in place on our voting systems.

Also Greg Palast has done good work on right wing republicans called True the Vote using
old Jim Crow rules managed to get @ least 4 million voters removed from voter rolls
in surgically sighted areas.

Another 2 million or so were stop from voting by the Post Office and various B.O.E.s
using excuses like the signatures don’t match or in Florida 500,000 + voters had their
votes put into question when their voter I.D. was challenged after they had registered.

The fix was in and Trump knew it. Remember his comments in July and October of 2024
that he didn’t need anymore votes.

LymphocyteLover

(9,025 posts)
61. There definitely were massive voter suppression efforts, massive propaganda operations
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 08:00 PM
Nov 5

I don't buy the massive electronic vote flipping story considering how many hundreds of county election offices they would have had to target.

Botany

(75,852 posts)
70. The vote flipping and deletions was done not at the precinct levels of which you are right would be unwork-...
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 08:54 PM
Nov 5

…. able but @ the county or state levels @ the Central Tabulators or Operating Systems at targeted
places where the data was being compiled. A standard bell shaped distribution of data should show
that the results would have an even distribution of results but in almost case of a glitch, a statistical
anomaly, a hanging chad, a voting block not showing up such as the 70% of Americans who support
a woman’s right to choose were not there in ‘24, voters being denied access to vote or having their vote
counted it has almost always favored the Republicans. And that has been going on for decades.

LymphocyteLover

(9,025 posts)
74. you don't think anyone in the secretary of Dem state offices of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 10:17 PM
Nov 5

looked at whether tabulator total matched the numbers that came from the counties?

Botany

(75,852 posts)
91. Good questions,
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 08:50 AM
Thursday

Last edited Thu Nov 6, 2025, 09:54 AM - Edit history (1)

What I do know the architecture was in place that would allow for manipulation of the voting data
and that this hack onto America’s democracy was very very very sophisticated and that efforts
were made to hide “it” too.

In Pennsylvania in Erie, Pittsburgh, and in Philadelphia all of which are very blue a late afternoon
surge of Trump votes came in on Election Day.

Botany

(75,852 posts)
134. A large surge of red voters from a large strongly blue voting population @ the last minute? Please.
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 09:02 AM
Friday

Once again I might be able to buy that but for some reason every time these anomalies, glitches, vote surges, undervotes, and voter deletions didn’t go to help the Republican Presidential Candidate time after
time. Simple statistics would likely show some kind of causality behind those votes and occurrences.

From 2020 to 2024 the only states that showed any increase in Trump vote and under vote for Harris were
the swing states, 88 counties went from blue to red, and with zero going from red to blue nationwide, and
Musk’s own words on Joe Rogan, “I have a special appreciation that lets me see the returns early. IOWs
he was into the data.

Botany

(75,852 posts)
150. A simple bell shaped curve for statical analysis will easily show causality behind the election results.
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 09:27 AM
Saturday


If results are random then you should have data on both sides of the middle in
almost equal frequencies but Trump as Republican candidates for POTUS since
1968 show results that blow up that curve. Every voter disenfranchisement, every
election result that doesn’t make sense, every hanging chad, almost every story from
the mainstream media supporting the republican or casting doubt on ?ing on the
results helps the republicans, every removed ballot drop box, every result that doesn’t
make sense …. such as where were the 70% of Americans who support women’s health
care aka abortion in 2024 ….. and on and on.

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
152. There you go! Seems simple when you look at the mathematical models.
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 11:21 AM
Saturday

Math = logic.

Logic = math.

LymphocyteLover

(9,025 posts)
147. please provide a specific example of that kind of red surge in a blue area
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 07:55 PM
Friday

I'd like to see convincing data on that.

Also, I assume you meant Musk had an "application" not an "appreciation"

questionseverything

(11,473 posts)
120. You think someone from the sos office at the state level looks at every precinct result to see if it matches?
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 05:00 PM
Thursday

No they don’t

stopdiggin

(14,693 posts)
98. I sorry. But it NEVER happened.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 11:56 AM
Thursday

There is not a shred of evidence for it (to this day !) . And insistence that it happened nonetheless - is where we veer off into conspiracy land.

And it really bothers that people on my side continue to ride this train. Makes us sound like a bunch of knuckle draggers ....
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -

Chemical Bill

(2,988 posts)
69. I hear you...
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 08:33 PM
Nov 5

this on top of the old fashioned methods of too few voting machines in Democratic areas, or even too few polling places. There are much shorter lines in Republican areas. Everything in The Conyers Report is still in play. And now we have targeted bomb scares.

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
79. Musk had the technology.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 11:28 PM
Nov 5

Last edited Thu Nov 6, 2025, 02:36 PM - Edit history (1)

"Musk turned on 265 low earth orbit satellites on Oct. 30, 24 that used Starlink’s D.T.C. (direct to cell) to be in communications with
the firmware patches that were put in place on our voting systems."

Nothing coincidental here.

The data from Election Truth Alliance matches up with the capabilities of the machines. And the end result matched the evil vilaain master plan of the grifter and his "backers".

Harris did not lose.

stopdiggin

(14,693 posts)
103. this is repeated by a lot of people that have no idea what the 'technology' is
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 12:38 PM
Thursday

"matches up with the capabilities" ... - - - - - - (but without a shred of evidence)

These people are selling you a 'story'! You are not required to buy it. (unless that is what you wish to do)

stopdiggin

(14,693 posts)
119. are you offering this as some species of 'evidence'?
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 04:32 PM
Thursday

(and this, in a nutshell, is why we have half the country .... ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Chemical Bill

(2,988 posts)
123. Perhaps you stopped reading...
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 08:44 PM
Thursday

before the Franklin County, Ohio precinct with 638 voters that had 4258 votes for W. You might be interested in what Stephen Spoonamore had to say., but that's a long way down as well. There's a link to more problems with the 2004 presidential election in Ohio, this was well covered in The Conyers Report.

stopdiggin

(14,693 posts)
124. Yawn. It really isn't worth my good time. (while repeating, "this is evidence ..?" ) - -(nt)-
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 08:48 PM
Thursday

MorbidButterflyTat

(3,880 posts)
72. Agree.
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 09:23 PM
Nov 5

I gotta laugh at the idea of giving the corrupt convicted felon and his amoral crony cult the benefit of the doubt.

WestMichRad

(2,780 posts)
73. They will intensify efforts to disenfranchise...
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 09:27 PM
Nov 5

… demographic groups that favor Dems, to try and swing the vote in ‘26 to their favor. And if that is still insufficient to retain power, they’ll be ready to cheat more brazenly.

electric_blue68

(24,854 posts)
78. In '26, and '28 we need the brightest, wileyest White Hat Hackers keeping all eyes on the votes & totals, tabulaters etc
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 11:23 PM
Nov 5

Like (the fictional) Harold Finch, and Ms Groves!

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
111. Yes.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 03:03 PM
Thursday

And Kara Swisher says we need White Har Hackers to try and figure out what DOGE did at the Social Security Admin and other agencies.

AncientOfDays

(246 posts)
80. my theory
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 12:21 AM
Thursday

My Theory is that they can only cheat a little without it becoming obvious. This time simply overran the cheating.

SupportSanity

(1,551 posts)
87. They've proved it already but have trouble selling it
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 07:18 AM
Thursday

Electiontruthalliance.org
Data experts and statisticians got together and have analysed election data.
Go to their website and they will show you exactly how the cheating occurred.

Torchlight

(6,117 posts)
90. My gut's about the same
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 08:44 AM
Thursday

I certainly wouldn't bet a paycheck on my tea-leaves, all other things being equal however, that feeling will probably remain for quite some time.

BlueTsunami2018

(4,754 posts)
93. The economy is being wrecked, people feel it.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 09:01 AM
Thursday

They thought it was bad last year when it was doing ok and so they voted for Piss.

They really feel it now and so they went the other way.

It really is that simple.

Martin68

(26,625 posts)
96. I don't think so. It just took a year or two of Trump in full swing to get out the vote, and persuade even many
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 10:37 AM
Thursday

Republicans that Trump is a con, a fool, a greedy schmuck who will destroy this country if given the chance.

stopdiggin

(14,693 posts)
99. I'm sorry - but it NEVER happened. And your twitchy 'senses' are leading you astray.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 11:58 AM
Thursday

There is not a shred of evidence for it (to this day !) . And insistence that it happened nonetheless - is where we veer off into conspiracy land.

And it really bothers that people on my side continue to ride this train. Makes us sound like a bunch of knuckle draggers ....
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -

OLDMDDEM

(2,910 posts)
101. I thought so too. I felt that way after Pennsylvania and Michigan went to Trump. It doesn't make sense.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 12:05 PM
Thursday

krawhitham

(5,044 posts)
107. Same thing happened 8 years ago
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 01:21 PM
Thursday

Trump wins, the public immediately have remorse for their vote and GOP got crushed in 1st Off Off election since his win

7 Takeaways From Election Day 2017
Democrats won up and down the ballot Tuesday night, notably in the governors' races in Virginia and New Jersey. The victories were a much needed sigh of relief for a party that hadn't had any high-profile victories at the ballot box during the first year of the Trump presidency — despite his record-low approval ratings.


https://www.npr.org/2017/11/08/562759205/7-takeaways-from-election-day-2017

angryxyouth

(312 posts)
108. Eforensic analysis says something aint right
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 01:35 PM
Thursday

Malicious anomalies found in all the swing states and Texas with the vote tallies. The results are not consistent with human behavior. Learn about why we need full hand count audits to prove what the experts say are red flags recognized by all democracies around the world. See explanations of the reports, charts and graphs at the “Election Truth Alliance” on their YouTube channel, web page or substack.

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
117. So since this is all so clearly documented and proven, you must be accusing Kamala of knowing
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 03:46 PM
Thursday

the election was stolen from us, and that she has for whatever reason chosen to do or say nothing about it? She must even be complicit in a coverup by this thinking.

Or are you accusing Kamala, and all Democratic leaders for that matter, of just being too dumb and incompetent to consume publicly available information that contains incontrovertible proof of a stolen election?

This sort of attack on Democrats is the only way to prop up these nonsense conspiracy theories.

angryxyouth

(312 posts)
136. Yes I am
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 10:56 AM
Friday

Because Trump used Stalin’s tactic of “accuse your enemies of what you are doing” and making the idea or vocalization of accusations of election fraud so repugnant that when fraud actually did happen Kamala and the rest of the party democrats were pussies and did not want to look like Trump did in 2020 so stayed quiet.

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
137. At least you're honest, this contempt and hatred for Harris and Democrats appears widespread among election deniers
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 11:14 AM
Friday

Why bother being a Democrat if you think the party feebly and knowingly allows elections to be stolen?

This is a ridiculous slander against Harris and all Democrats, these conspiracy theories really do rot out minds.

angryxyouth

(312 posts)
153. Sometimes the truth hurts
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 06:59 PM
Monday

Why don’t you actually take the time and check out the link that I put up. The election through alliance just filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania trying to get hand count audits. The evidence they list on their latest posts is mind blowing.

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
144. Yes. "They" use Russian-type psy-ops to convince people not to question elections,
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 04:33 PM
Friday

for fear of looking like the "other guy". And unfortunately it works.

I call it reverse "I know you are but what am I?"

yellow dahlia

(3,982 posts)
121. Don't worry. Most of us realize that this is in NO way an attack on Dems.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 07:45 PM
Thursday

Don't you hate it when people misconstrue your premise?

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
133. It is absolutely a vicious attack on Democrats. You must believe truly terrible things about Kamala Harris and Democrats
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 08:38 AM
Friday

for these ridiculous election denial conspiracy theories to “work”

These attacks on Harris and Democrats are utterly disgusting, and the conspiracy mongers should be ashamed of themselves.

fujiyamasan

(948 posts)
145. The problem is the premise is flawed
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 04:44 PM
Friday

There is no convincing evidence that Musk and Thiel “hacked” the election. The two are ass holes, but stealing several swing states (some of them with democratic governors and secretaries of state) is a very difficult task and would have required them having access to systems they wouldn’t have.

It’s also a red herring. The GOP has other (much simpler) ways of subverting democracy, like through mid decade gerrymandering and voter disenfranchisement (number of ballot boxes, mail in ballot access, etc)

Getting hung up on nonsense like “omg they stole an election because of the machines!” is a distraction and takes away from the real fight.

Chemical Bill

(2,988 posts)
146. Interestingly...
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 06:18 PM
Friday

Exit polls used to correspond with the final vote count almost perfectly. By 2004, vote counts in some 16 or 17 states were outside of the margin of error for the exit polls. Some excellent work on DU at the time showed where voting machines from one particular company was way off, while other machines showed excellent correlation. In 2004, all but one of the discrepancies favored W over Kerry, and all but one of those flipped the state (see Was The 2004 Presidential Election Stolen? by Freeman). So the PTB altered the exit polls after the fact to better match the "vote count".

Now, the only way to prove or disprove election fraud is to hand count the paper ballots. This was not done in 2000, 2004, 2016, or 2024. It was done in 2020, when Joe Biden was elected. Actually, it was done in Florida in 2000 by a media consortium including the NY Times, but the result was not published for months after W was sworn in. The recount showed that every statewide recount scenario gave the state, and hence the presidency, to Gore. Those results are available on Wikipedia.

So hand counted paper ballot recounts showed that Gore should have been president from 2001 to 2005. They showed that Biden won in 2020. But there is no proof that W ever won, and also TSF. As you may remember, Republicans fought tooth and nail to prevent hand counted recounts in 2000 and 2016, and were successful.

I agree that Republicans use purges, gerrymandering, and various disenfranchisement methods (even targeted bomb threats). When these are not enough, vote counts show evidence of fraud. See Election Truth Alliance. For some reason, the only method to prove if elections are clean or not is opposed by Republicans if they win. This is no red herring.

jmowreader

(52,778 posts)
109. That's one way to look at it, and I believe it to be true
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 01:40 PM
Thursday

Given that, to put Trump in office required A LOT of fucking around at all levels of the election apparatus, from precinct to state board of elections. Most of the people who did the fucking around are still there and could have fucked around with this election if they so desired. However, the vote has to be close enough to make fucking around look plausible...no one would ever believe Trump legitimately took Massachusetts, California or Hawaii, but they could believe he legitimately took Michigan or North Carolina.

A larger problem with this election, for the fucking-arounders, is that a year of Trump has caused A LOT of pain to the electorate. You've got much higher prices, goon squads in the streets, and that orange bastard has started tearing down the White House.

The reason for the blowout is simple: The margins between the D and R candidates were high enough no one would believe the results if elections were flipped.

jmowreader

(52,778 posts)
115. Not worth it
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 03:17 PM
Thursday

The highest offices that most of these elections decided were governors. Trump needs Congress-critters to get his evil enacted.

Silent Type

(11,959 posts)
118. Didn't happen in 2024 either. We lost. Was hoping Conspiracy Theories would stop, but nope.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 04:07 PM
Thursday

Metaphorical

(2,560 posts)
127. I absolutely think that 2024 was stolen
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 10:31 PM
Thursday

Trump was a known quantity, and his reputation among Hispanics in particular was never great. Yet somehow in the four years from the 2020 election to the 2024 election, you saw a massive swing toward Trump, only for the numbers to nearly reverse with the 2025 election. Demographics can change, but very very seldom do they do so that dramatically.

I would look very closely at both Musk and Thiel, along with Eric Prince. DOGE was Trump's payoff to Musk, but Musk proved himself too obnoxious to be that close to the center of power for long. I also think that this was the kind of thing they only could have pulled off once, because there are now too many people watching more closely to trip them up. This is part of why Trump's reaction this time around was so ham-handed - the wheels on the conspiracy bus are beginning to come off.

Polybius

(21,156 posts)
128. Republicans are saying the same thing about Tuesday
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 05:13 AM
Friday

See how ridiculous that sounds? If Republicans could steal a major election with Biden in power, then how come they couldn't steal a far easier election with Trump in power?

EdmondDantes_

(1,142 posts)
149. Does that same logic apply to the 2010 elections?
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 08:34 PM
Friday

After all in 2008 we won the White House, the Senate, and the House. Then in 2010, Republicans took 7 Senate seats and 63 House seats. Does that sweeping victory prove we cheated in 2008? Obviously not. Nor does this set of elections in an off year with a deeply polarizing and overall unpopular president and a dysfunctional Republican Congress that has so far passed a big tax cut and otherwise twiddled their thumbs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My Spidey senses are acti...