Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(79,021 posts)
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 09:51 AM Thursday

The National Guardsman who won't take orders from Trump


The National Guardsman who won’t take orders from Trump
Dylan Blaha, an Illinois congressional candidate, says “I was just following orders” is no excuse

By Russell Payne
Staff Reporter
Published November 6, 2025 9:00AM (EST)




(Salon) Dylan Blaha, an Illinois National Guard member, is waging a campaign focused at bringing an affordability agenda to Washington D.C., while sounding the alarm on President Donald Trump’s politicization of the United States military.

In May, Blaha announced that he was challenging Rep. Nikki Budzinski, D-Ill., in the Democratic primary for Illinois’s 13th Congressional District, which stretches up from East Saint Louis in the south of the state north through Springfield, Decatur and Champaign.

In an interview with Salon, Blaha said that he was fighting to represent the district with a different sort of politics, one that rejected the influence and money of special interests and put issues of affordability for working-class families first.

....(snip)....

Blaha went on to say that training for the guard is typically focused on potential overseas deployment or helping in disaster relief efforts, not in helping a historically unpopular president settle political scores.

“National Guard soldiers don’t want to be pitted against their community. They don’t agree with all this stuff, but I do feel like there is a culture of fear that makes it so that there are very few people who have spoken out,” Blaha said. “ I do think you kind of have those two conflicting ideas that they don’t want to do this, but they’re also afraid to speak out. And I just am afraid that we’ll see the same thing that we heard in 1930s 1940s Germany, where a lot of people say, ‘Well, I was just following orders.’” ..................(more)

https://www.salon.com/2025/11/06/the-national-guardsman-who-wont-take-orders-from-trump/




7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

William Seger

(12,043 posts)
3. Court martialing him would require proving that it was a lawful order
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 12:12 PM
Thursday

Good luck with that, since courts have ordered #rump to not deploy them.

paleotn

(21,155 posts)
5. Didn't work for Germans.... Just following orders
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 12:25 PM
Thursday

Won’t work now. And if they think there won’t be repercussions, people thought that in Nov. 1940. 5 years later…Nuremberg Trials. A number of “order followers” were hung a year later. Just saying.

BobTheSubgenius

(12,149 posts)
6. The Allies - in no small part, the US - hanged or imprisoned many Germans who were "
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 12:34 PM
Thursday

"just following orders." It is by no means a defence against charges of criminal conduct, military, or not.

mucholderthandirt

(1,715 posts)
7. I get some of his stuff in my FB feed. He's right. We are obligated by our oath to not follow unlawful orders.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 06:07 PM
Thursday

The military is never relieved of the oath we take upon enlistment/officer contract. Never. We are by law made to obey that oath, or risk discipline. In fact, we are subject to recall at any time, which is why they don't say "oh, never mind, you got discharged, you're good". Even officers.

Let's stick to that oath. If they try to discipline everyone, they'll stop this idiocy. There won't be time for anything else.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The National Guardsman wh...