General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe National Guardsman who won't take orders from Trump
The National Guardsman who wont take orders from Trump
Dylan Blaha, an Illinois congressional candidate, says I was just following orders is no excuse
By Russell Payne
Staff Reporter
Published November 6, 2025 9:00AM (EST)

(Salon) Dylan Blaha, an Illinois National Guard member, is waging a campaign focused at bringing an affordability agenda to Washington D.C., while sounding the alarm on President Donald Trumps politicization of the United States military.
In May, Blaha announced that he was challenging Rep. Nikki Budzinski, D-Ill., in the Democratic primary for Illinoiss 13th Congressional District, which stretches up from East Saint Louis in the south of the state north through Springfield, Decatur and Champaign.
In an interview with Salon, Blaha said that he was fighting to represent the district with a different sort of politics, one that rejected the influence and money of special interests and put issues of affordability for working-class families first.
....(snip)....
Blaha went on to say that training for the guard is typically focused on potential overseas deployment or helping in disaster relief efforts, not in helping a historically unpopular president settle political scores.
National Guard soldiers dont want to be pitted against their community. They dont agree with all this stuff, but I do feel like there is a culture of fear that makes it so that there are very few people who have spoken out, Blaha said. I do think you kind of have those two conflicting ideas that they dont want to do this, but theyre also afraid to speak out. And I just am afraid that well see the same thing that we heard in 1930s 1940s Germany, where a lot of people say, Well, I was just following orders. ..................(more)
https://www.salon.com/2025/11/06/the-national-guardsman-who-wont-take-orders-from-trump/
Doodley
(11,510 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(16,762 posts)William Seger
(12,043 posts)Good luck with that, since courts have ordered #rump to not deploy them.
twodogsbarking
(16,654 posts)paleotn
(21,155 posts)Wont work now. And if they think there wont be repercussions, people thought that in Nov. 1940. 5 years later Nuremberg Trials. A number of order followers were hung a year later. Just saying.
BobTheSubgenius
(12,149 posts)"just following orders." It is by no means a defence against charges of criminal conduct, military, or not.
mucholderthandirt
(1,715 posts)The military is never relieved of the oath we take upon enlistment/officer contract. Never. We are by law made to obey that oath, or risk discipline. In fact, we are subject to recall at any time, which is why they don't say "oh, never mind, you got discharged, you're good". Even officers.
Let's stick to that oath. If they try to discipline everyone, they'll stop this idiocy. There won't be time for anything else.