General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy would Trump want the Senate GOBers to blow up the filibuster?
The GOBers already have control of the government! It would only hurt the president more than any other part of the government?
I know! But does Trump really knows what a filibuster means? Oh, what the hell, go ahead and get your way! F the country you piece of garbage!
33taw
(3,259 posts)I think it is a bluff.
gab13by13
(30,625 posts)He wants the shutdown to go on but by demanding that the Senate nuke the filibuster, he can blame Congress when shit gets worse.
pecosbob
(8,233 posts)Just as the founding slavemasters intended.
bottomofthehill
(9,311 posts)He has the votes. He can get 51 votes on almost anything. He does not have 60. He would have at least 1 year and possibly 3 to do whatever the fuck he wanted.
LetMyPeopleVote
(172,486 posts)If the president convinces Republicans to scrap the filibuster, what would he want to pass? Legislation specifically targeting elections.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-ties-anti-filibuster-crusade-plan-pass-voter-reform-rcna242380
The morning after a dominant Democratic performance in the 2025 elections, the president told Senate Republicans that if they agreed to put an end to legislative filibusters, the change would make it impossible to beat Republicans in upcoming elections. If we do what Im saying, he added, Democrats will most likely never obtain power.
He made a related pitch hours later on Fox News, telling Bret Baier that getting rid of the filibuster would allow Republicans to approve unnamed good things that would make it difficult to beat the GOP in the near future.
Trump: "I think if we got rid of the filibuster, we would approve so many good things -- common sense things, wonderful things -- that it would be hard to beat us."
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-11-05T23:29:43.393Z
......Voter reform is itself a phrase thats ridiculous and terrifying in equal measure. There are plenty of things in need of reform in the U.S., but theres no need to add voters to the list.
Indeed, consider the related data points from recent weeks:
At the White Houses behest, Republicans in some states are engaging in brazen gerrymandering, using mid-decade redistricting to win congressional races before they happen.
The Justice Department is fighting to acquire voter registration lists and election data in several states for reasons that still havent been explained.
The Republican administration has chosen election deniers to serve in key federal election roles, leading The New York Times to note that conspiracy theorists who worked to destabilize and discredit election results after 2020 will now have the power to potentially interfere with future contests.
Trumps DOJ also deployed federal election observers to monitor elections in California and New Jersey.
The president is lobbying for the total elimination of early voting.
Its against this backdrop that Trump also wants Senate Republicans to kill the chambers filibuster rule, clearing the way for something he called voter reform and a political dynamic in which Democrats will most likely never obtain power.
In isolation, each of these stories matters, but taken together, were talking about what appears to be a multifaceted campaign against elections, launched by a president whose contempt for the democratic process is unsubtle.
trump does not believe in fair and free elections and wants to change the rules to suppress the vote and steal elections