But so far for the Trump clique it does not matter.

biased, corrupt, Republican, Appointed Judges swarming in the Appellate Courts.....

And even more true in the USSC......

that their means justifies the end result.....

And make no bones about it.

because they depend upon them for their cases. It should be noted in both cases the perjury greatly harmed their cases.

when you have Supreme Court Justices who blatantly lied during their confirmation hearings??
Telling 'alternate truths' (that is, statements that can only be truths in an alternate universe) are apparently acceptable now.

She won’t approve charges.

And it happens in front of them in court.

In the case of criminal contempt, judges can name a special prosecutor if DOJ refuses.

It's the so-called rule 42:

Rule 42: The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 42) was amended in 2002 to specifically allow for this practice in criminal contempt cases.

Granted this seems extreme and I don't know if a judge ever invoked it. It's a sign of our times with this rogue DOJ that this kind of thing is being discussed.

That a bulletproof jacket was probably sufficient to protect him from a sandwich. Paraphrased.

Nothing Is Illegal If You Are A Republican

Haven't you been keeping up?

Spoke too soon, Bovino got consequences

Help me understand this

Ya know. You have to mitigate consequences dealt to them.

(the tear gas lie was just cited a minute ago on Ari)

The criminals are in control of the government, and the sad news is there won't be any justice or accountability until they are no longer in control , also no one will stop them until the vast majority of people rise up against them, it's up to us

As to the sandwich guy, I assume you are talking about the claimed explosion since I just watched the video - and the sandwich did hit the officer. Whether it exploded or not isn't material to the charge of battery. Battery doesn't get established (or the level of offense changed) based on whether the battery was messy. The perjury must be as to a material fact to be a crime, and that lie wasn't material.

As to the second - it would be up to the local prosecutor to charge Bonvino with perjury.

I've never seen anyone charged with perjury but it surely pisses off judges and juries.

That's why I always tell clients that if a lawyer asks a question with a court reporter present, they not only know the answer but can prove it.

He did find condiments and a piece of onion on his vest. Just not from an imaginary sandwich explosion, I’m damn sure the federal agent ate that sandwich when no one was looking.