And so many Republicans are okay with that.

============

Seems to me they try to manage issues, and throw conflicting solutions at it, then when they lose it gets escalated to higher ups who decide to litigate some more.

They said "We want to pay, but we can't. It would be illegal. It's the Democrats fault"

When "it would be illegal" was exposed as a big fat lie, they should have just taken the loss. Then they could have said, "See, we're paying. We always wanted to. We really thought we couldn't. We were mistaken."

But no. They appeal and thereby expose "We want to pay" as a big fat lie too.

Or did he or some of his cabal do something with the money they weren’t supposed to be doing

Consider:

- The current balance of Section 32 is reported to be 23 billion.

- Funding Food Nutrition Service (FNS) Child Nutrition Programs is a key purpose for the Section 32 fund.

- 39% of SNAP recipients are children. That makes it a child nutrition program as important as WIC and school lunch programs.

- WIC costs 600 million per month.

- SNAP costs 8 billion.

- The balance of the SNAP contingency fund is reported to be at least 5 billion, leaving 3 billion to be made up from Section 32.

- Section 32 is funded by 30% of customs duties from the prior year. Hasn't Trump been telling us that they've collected trillions in tariffs? Even if reality is closer to 100 billion, that means come 1/1/2025, the Section 32 fund is getting a deposit of about 30 billion that is COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Even if SNAP and WIC need to be fully funded from Section 32 funds for both November AND December, the balance in Section 32 is only reduced to somewhere around 10.8 billion -- and will be replenished with 30% of tariffs collected in 2024, completely independent of the budget appropriations process.

3 billion SNAP Nov
8 billion SNAP Dec
O.6 billion WIC Nov
0.6 billion WIC Dec
---------------------+
12.2 billion total


They say funding SNAP from Section 32 funds would put WIC at risk.

Nonsense.

They say courts can't tell them how to spend treasury dollars; that courts aren't the appropriators. They seem to think THEY are the arbiters of Congressional intent -- that courts have no place in it.

That one is beyond nonsense. When you read the quotes it is just confused gobbledegoop about the Constitutional role of the three branches.

His first term saw massive (unnecessary) COVID deaths but that path is now closed so he and his criminal gang had to find a new way forward. Starvation and unaffordable health care will take over from here.