Eat the rich

There is always a reason that the poor and disenfranchised must suffer. I'm sure that the legal reasoning given sounds perfectly reasonable.
Reality is that SCOTUS have made multiple shadow docket rulings in favor of this administration that was counter to legal precedent without justification or even an explanation. Multiple federal court judges have, repeatedly, complained as much.

So, if they wanted, SCOTUS could have ruled in favor of feeding the elderly, the handicap and children but instead decided "nah".

Its not about Justice Jackson and her ruling. I don't expect anything good out of this Court but it's a pattern that SCOTUS always finds a way for rich and entitled to get what they want but the poor and disenfranchised are always asked to compromise.

Compromise is great as long as you are not the one being compromised.

Eat. The. Rich.