Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceWave

(2,465 posts)
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 05:44 PM Sunday

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (PeaceWave) on Tue Nov 11, 2025, 09:48 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) PeaceWave Sunday OP
It's too clever for us to understand leftstreet Sunday #1
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Sunday #4
It's actually pretty easy leftstreet Sunday #7
In other words, the usual Beltway kabuki theater Bluetus Sunday #9
Schumer said he's voting no SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #13
He'll still be blamed leftstreet Sunday #18
Fair point SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #24
In other words. choie Sunday #28
I believe Schumer is too blame. Trueblue1968 Sunday #38
Its 10-dimensional Chess...... TheRealNorth Sunday #33
Dems had a clear mandate to fight and fight hard. Irish_Dem Sunday #2
Schumer was always looking to 'compromise' not to fight JCMach1 Sunday #3
Bend over not compromise orangecrush Sunday #12
Remember when Biden was forced out? nt BootinUp Sunday #5
Remember when he said he was going to be a one term president? Alpeduez21 Sunday #17
The big money donors forced him out yes. I guess you don't read much real news. As to your BootinUp Sunday #53
They're being led by old school thinking Baitball Blogger Sunday #6
AOC BlueKota Sunday #49
What about the DU post basically saying Axios is full of shit? yliza Sunday #8
We were right to be skeptial IbogaProject Sunday #15
Is it possible Schumer will take the heat yorkster Sunday #10
He already is SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #11
I mean that Schumer is willing to take yorkster Sunday #16
Hes voting no. Just now from Senate floor. yorkster Sunday #20
Pretty sure the house has already passed this legislation Alpeduez21 Sunday #19
You may be right. I thought it had to go yorkster Sunday #25
I've heard or found conflicting infomation so I don't know what gonna happen Alpeduez21 Sunday #42
I read in a thread here since the bills don't match BlueKota Sunday #50
Oh you think Jeffries choie Sunday #30
And so what if he does remain opposed. choie Sunday #32
I hear a bit of snark... yorkster Sunday #44
more than a bit. choie Sunday #47
No need to inject negativity here. yorkster Sunday #48
I'm reminded of the nickname the sailors on the USS Caine had for Captain Queeg. BannonsLiver Sunday #14
Dems will lose the midterms if they do this, and they will deserve it Takket Sunday #21
Counterpoint: No they won't Prairie Gates Sunday #23
no one has ever made a proposal that they know the opposition won't accept bigtree Sunday #22
Do you remember the republican party choie Sunday #34
I saw an expression or something on social media years ago EnergizedLib Sunday #26
Wow, I've not heard that before. choie Sunday #35
Slotkin is voting no. James48 Sunday #27
Those electoral wins have no bearing on Congress at this point EdmondDantes_ Sunday #29
Pissing off much of their voting base doesn't seem to be very smart a year from a major election. nt yaesu Sunday #36
What has changed from a month ago? choie Sunday #37
A bunch of people lost paychecks, a bunch of people didn't get SNAP benefits, a bunch of flights got cancelled EdmondDantes_ Sunday #45
Again, choie Sunday #46
That's an argument for not having the shutdown, it's not an argument in favor of sticking with a losing plan EdmondDantes_ Sunday #51
Not complicated at all there was going to be massive suffering the moment Trump got back into office standingtall Sunday #41
This message was self-deleted by its author geojazz Sunday #43
Pissing off their entire voting base doesn't seem to be very smart so maybe brain worms are contagious? nt yaesu Sunday #31
NO!!!! NO!!!! FUCK SCHUMER AND THE HORSE HE RODE IN ON!!! AverageOldGuy Sunday #39
Tim Kaine was Hillary's biggest mistake. yourout Sunday #55
People need to ask themselves which constituents they think any given politician is working for. RockRaven Sunday #40
I mean, it won't look good when Republicans vote no next month EnergizedLib Sunday #52
Because we have stealth Republicans wearing the blue. yourout Sunday #54
Here's a left field theory Shipwack Sunday #56
Time for a reckoning‼️ flying-skeleton Monday #57
To make it even worse FHRRK Monday #58
I hate to be a conspiracy theorist, but is seem that the Democratic Party has been infiltrated by fake democrats W T F Monday #59
What huge electoral wins? SocialDemocrat61 Monday #60
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Monday #61
Me too SocialDemocrat61 Monday #62

leftstreet

(38,208 posts)
1. It's too clever for us to understand
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 05:45 PM
Sunday

If the Democratic legislators trust Trump, we should too

Response to leftstreet (Reply #1)

leftstreet

(38,208 posts)
7. It's actually pretty easy
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 06:10 PM
Sunday

Schumer is basically throwing himself and abt 24 million ACA people under the bus

Schumer will get the blame as a caving, gutless, bad leader, but he's no stranger to that. A whole bunch of "progressive" members will make headlines assuring us he needs to be replaced.

The Democrats believe they'll gain an advantage electorally when the GOP refuses to make good on the ACA Subsidy Pinkie Promise

Bluetus

(1,893 posts)
9. In other words, the usual Beltway kabuki theater
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 07:55 PM
Sunday

And then they all slap each other on the back and say "Anybody for a good drink? I'm buying."

SocialDemocrat61

(6,418 posts)
13. Schumer said he's voting no
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:11 PM
Sunday

So I don’t think it’s fair to say he’s caving. This is the responsibility of 10 senators who went rouge.

leftstreet

(38,208 posts)
18. He'll still be blamed
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:21 PM
Sunday

A leader who can't "lead" his people

SocialDemocrat61

(6,418 posts)
24. Fair point
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:30 PM
Sunday

But the 10 who went Rouge should be held chiefly responsible.

choie

(6,386 posts)
28. In other words.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:36 PM
Sunday

They are bloody cowardly, self-serving hypocrites.

Trueblue1968

(18,946 posts)
38. I believe Schumer is too blame.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:45 PM
Sunday

TheRealNorth

(9,647 posts)
33. Its 10-dimensional Chess......
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:40 PM
Sunday

Our leaders are too smart to explain it to peasants like us in a way that we could comprehend.

Irish_Dem

(77,782 posts)
2. Dems had a clear mandate to fight and fight hard.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 05:47 PM
Sunday

JCMach1

(29,046 posts)
3. Schumer was always looking to 'compromise' not to fight
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 05:50 PM
Sunday

orangecrush

(27,534 posts)
12. Bend over not compromise
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:08 PM
Sunday

BootinUp

(50,623 posts)
5. Remember when Biden was forced out? nt
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 05:52 PM
Sunday

Alpeduez21

(1,984 posts)
17. Remember when he said he was going to be a one term president?
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:21 PM
Sunday

Remember when he slept walked thought the debate?
Remember when he didn't want universal healthcare?
Remember when he didn't fight for school loan forgiveness?
Forced out my ass. EVERY FUCKING POLE SHOWED HIM LOSING TO TRUMP WORSE THAN KAMELA. Remember that?

BootinUp

(50,623 posts)
53. The big money donors forced him out yes. I guess you don't read much real news. As to your
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:32 PM
Sunday

irrelevant rant I couldn't care less if you don't understand the politics. I got my own concerns.

Baitball Blogger

(51,446 posts)
6. They're being led by old school thinking
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 06:04 PM
Sunday

Like Merrit Garland’s way of thinking,

BlueKota

(4,883 posts)
49. AOC
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:19 PM
Sunday

said after Mandami win, that the old guard needs to step aside to let those who want to lead the party forward do so.

yliza

(195 posts)
8. What about the DU post basically saying Axios is full of shit?
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 07:49 PM
Sunday

It links a BlueSky thread from capitolhunters that makes the assertion that dems are going to cave sound suspect. I’ll wait for confirmation before I get mad at Schumer.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220787624]

Edit: I added some context.

IbogaProject

(5,401 posts)
15. We were right to be skeptial
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:15 PM
Sunday

But now it has been confirmed that there is a rare Sunday session underway so the previous concerns about the story's veracity are now moot.

yorkster

(3,563 posts)
10. Is it possible Schumer will take the heat
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:05 PM
Sunday

knowing that Jeffries is opposed and it won't pass the House?

SocialDemocrat61

(6,418 posts)
11. He already is
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:08 PM
Sunday

Despite him saying that he’s voting no.

yorkster

(3,563 posts)
16. I mean that Schumer is willing to take
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:19 PM
Sunday

the heat knowing that the bill probably won't pass the house.
I have no idea, of course. Schumer's deal from Friday sounded good but the R's nixed it, naturally. It would have funded ACA credits for a year and the Dems could have run on that, warning that the R's would try again to end the credits for the ACA.

yorkster

(3,563 posts)
20. Hes voting no. Just now from Senate floor.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:23 PM
Sunday

Good.

Alpeduez21

(1,984 posts)
19. Pretty sure the house has already passed this legislation
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:23 PM
Sunday

There has been no talk of this going back to the house.

yorkster

(3,563 posts)
25. You may be right. I thought it had to go
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:33 PM
Sunday

back to the house.

Alpeduez21

(1,984 posts)
42. I've heard or found conflicting infomation so I don't know what gonna happen
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:54 PM
Sunday

I do know this has taken the wind right out of the sails from Tuesday's highs.

BlueKota

(4,883 posts)
50. I read in a thread here since the bills don't match
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:24 PM
Sunday

it has to go back to the House. The question remains if it does go back, will there be enough votes to pass it in the House. Jeffries is against it, but since tsf is apparently for it, likely the Republicans will all vote yes. Also we don't know whether there are any House Dems who will jump ship and vote yes.

choie

(6,386 posts)
30. Oh you think Jeffries
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:37 PM
Sunday

will remain opposed?

choie

(6,386 posts)
32. And so what if he does remain opposed.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:39 PM
Sunday

He can't prevent the house to vote against it.

yorkster

(3,563 posts)
44. I hear a bit of snark...
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:58 PM
Sunday

Who knows?

choie

(6,386 posts)
47. more than a bit.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:09 PM
Sunday

yorkster

(3,563 posts)
48. No need to inject negativity here.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:17 PM
Sunday

No one's happy about this.

BannonsLiver

(20,089 posts)
14. I'm reminded of the nickname the sailors on the USS Caine had for Captain Queeg.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:13 PM
Sunday

Takket

(23,349 posts)
21. Dems will lose the midterms if they do this, and they will deserve it
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:25 PM
Sunday

not because everyone will vote for rethugs, but because too many people will just stay home if their choices are fascists, and quitters.

Prairie Gates

(6,796 posts)
23. Counterpoint: No they won't
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:28 PM
Sunday

bigtree

(93,231 posts)
22. no one has ever made a proposal that they know the opposition won't accept
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:27 PM
Sunday

...in order to call their bluff for everyone to see.

Of course they have. it's fucking standard political opposition, but the rub is a Dem electorate accustomed by troll after troll encouraging them to attack their own party instead.

It's something to behold, and you can count me out.

It's a binary political system with a dangerous party in control on one side and our Dems we managed to elect through all of the trolling on the other.

There isn't any Internet Outrage party that's going to make that equation any different. We can either bend the arc toward Democrats, or we can do this stupid outrage thing over politics that we have zero actual responsibility for managing as if our legislators were a meme or a monolith for internet gripers to take pot shots at instead of take the time to EVER support them.

Does anyone remember this republican party EVER trashing their party leaders for ANY political initiative? In the meantime, here we are claiming proposals are 'caves' as if the legislature was meant to be just some protest instead of governance.

As MOW organized Bayard Rustin wrote in his book, 'Strategies for Freedom,' activists often substitute and mistake volume and militancy for progress.

For a political movement to succeed, he wrote, it must have a legislative goal at the head of its advocacy to transform agitation into action.

Maybe turn down the volume against our own leaders charting a path forward, and point us to a legislative solution.

choie

(6,386 posts)
34. Do you remember the republican party
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:41 PM
Sunday

ever capitulating?

EnergizedLib

(2,895 posts)
26. I saw an expression or something on social media years ago
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:34 PM
Sunday

‘Republicans are why things get worse. Democrats are why things don’t get better.’

So, so true.

choie

(6,386 posts)
35. Wow, I've not heard that before.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:42 PM
Sunday

Interesting..

James48

(5,047 posts)
27. Slotkin is voting no.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:35 PM
Sunday

She said it’s not right.

Hold firm!

EdmondDantes_

(1,142 posts)
29. Those electoral wins have no bearing on Congress at this point
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:36 PM
Sunday

It's easy to say that they just have to hold out, but that has to be balanced against their obligations to federal workers, to people on SNAP, to people who need government services. I don't know how I'd vote in their position, but I know it's far more complicated than you're making it out to be.

yaesu

(8,807 posts)
36. Pissing off much of their voting base doesn't seem to be very smart a year from a major election. nt
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:42 PM
Sunday

choie

(6,386 posts)
37. What has changed from a month ago?
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:44 PM
Sunday

Did we get anything "we" wanted? No. Because we know damn well the republicans are not going to vote for ACA subsidies.

I have a lot of clients in NY who are on SNAP, and they blame the republicans for this mess. They're not saying "please Democrats, compromise, like you always do"

EdmondDantes_

(1,142 posts)
45. A bunch of people lost paychecks, a bunch of people didn't get SNAP benefits, a bunch of flights got cancelled
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:59 PM
Sunday

We simply don't have the votes to make Congress pass what we want. How long are you willing to let your clients go without SNAP? January 2027? What's going to change the makeup of Congress significantly before then?

choie

(6,386 posts)
46. Again,
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:07 PM
Sunday

did the Democrats not know that they would never get the votes? Did they think there'd be republicans who would stop marching in lock step? They knew that Federal workers were going to stop getting paychecks. They knew that SNAP recipients were going to have their SNAP benefits stopped. and if they didn't know, that's political malpractice.

EdmondDantes_

(1,142 posts)
51. That's an argument for not having the shutdown, it's not an argument in favor of sticking with a losing plan
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:25 PM
Sunday

Sometimes you try a thing and it doesn't work. You don't stick with a plan that isn't winning. What was a prolonged shutdown going to gain? How was it going to change the math in Congress? Once they had a shutdown, is your position that they were obligated to keep it no matter what? Sometimes we lose. If we had collectively voted better in 2024, if Democrats in Congress and the Biden administration in 2022 hadn't extended the subsidies that were done for covid for 3 years in order to make it fit budget reconciliation in the Inflation Reduction Act or had adjusted things to make permanent changes to the ACA subsidies, we wouldn't be here now. Or if any number of other things that have put us in a weird position where most people get health insurance through work but not everyone and we have exploding healthcare costs, particularly the last few years.

But we are here and we have to deal with that. If Republicans were never going to extend the subsidies, then why continue the shutdown?

standingtall

(3,144 posts)
41. Not complicated at all there was going to be massive suffering the moment Trump got back into office
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:54 PM
Sunday

200 billion was already cut from snap effective in 2026 so there already going to be people losing snap benefits and this will only enable them to make further cuts to it before Trump is gone. Open the Government with nothing in return. I guess so we can keep funding ice agents and the military occupying Cities and crush the momentum we had after the election. Stopping short term suffering without consideration of the long term suffering at the hands of the Trump administration is a gross miscalculation.

Response to EdmondDantes_ (Reply #29)

yaesu

(8,807 posts)
31. Pissing off their entire voting base doesn't seem to be very smart so maybe brain worms are contagious? nt
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:38 PM
Sunday

AverageOldGuy

(3,152 posts)
39. NO!!!! NO!!!! FUCK SCHUMER AND THE HORSE HE RODE IN ON!!!
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:45 PM
Sunday

I am absolutely, 100% disgusted at the Democratic Senate caucus for caving in return for absolutely nothing. What better sums up the Democratic Party than this?

Very slowly, glacially slow, the Democratic Party is realizing how to face Republicans.

But after a month–even iN the face of kicking Republicans ass on Tuesday in part because of the shutdown–there was just no way that weak ass losers like Tim Kaine (My Senator, Virginia) and Gary Peters and Jeanne Shaheen were going to have the courage to hold on. They simply care more about traveling by air than they do about the poor or about health care.

This is an absolutely clear 100% victory for Trump.

I ashamed of the Democratic Party leadership in Congress. Maybe it will change one day. Maybe we will still have a country worth saving at that time. Maybe I will outlive all these centrist shitheads.

yourout

(8,649 posts)
55. Tim Kaine was Hillary's biggest mistake.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:42 PM
Sunday

RockRaven

(18,349 posts)
40. People need to ask themselves which constituents they think any given politician is working for.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:48 PM
Sunday

EnergizedLib

(2,895 posts)
52. I mean, it won't look good when Republicans vote no next month
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:27 PM
Sunday

But let them own everything. Our side caving is unacceptable.

yourout

(8,649 posts)
54. Because we have stealth Republicans wearing the blue.
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 09:41 PM
Sunday

Republican secret agents protecting against progressives.

Shipwack

(2,907 posts)
56. Here's a left field theory
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 10:03 PM
Sunday

The caving Democrats are scared.

They are scared that the GOP will ditch the filibuster to pass this legislation on their own.

This scares some Democrats because even if the filibuster is broken just for this one bill, it sets a precedent. It shows that if you want a law bad enough, you can get rid of the filibuster.

This means that the centrists a Third Way-ers will have no excuse to oppose progressive policies. They can’t say “Gosh darn, that’s a great idea, but the Republicans won’t allow it. They’ll just filibuster it. Too bad “. They’ll then go back to counting their dark money from special interests.

flying-skeleton

(808 posts)
57. Time for a reckoning‼️
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 02:39 AM
Monday

These traitorous senators better have gotten rich from surrendering because they just ended their political careers and will have to live their lives in shame ‼️

I will donate to every one who primaries these traitors ‼️

FHRRK

(1,302 posts)
58. To make it even worse
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 03:38 AM
Monday

The clock was ticking on the SNAP benefits.

48 hours and the Repubs lost even more leverage.

Let’s take the worse case, the First District rules against Trump, he throws a fit and goes to the full SC. They fall inline for the immoral Repukes, then Schumer and the team of wimps at least have delivered a huge talking point. The Repubs and SC have screwed over millions of citizens while giving money to Argentina, spending billions on an airplane, building a ballroom, etc., so unfortunately to feed those in need we have no other option.

But for some reason, the Centrist Wimps couldn’t wait. And for the life of me, I can’t think of any good reason.

W T F

(1,184 posts)
59. I hate to be a conspiracy theorist, but is seem that the Democratic Party has been infiltrated by fake democrats
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 05:01 PM
Monday

SocialDemocrat61

(6,418 posts)
60. What huge electoral wins?
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 05:21 PM
Monday

Democrats won elections in four coastal state, all of which went for Harris last year. Only in Virginia did a democrat replace a republican. Control of neither house of congress was overturned because they weren’t at play. While democrats had a good night on Tuesday, it’s a bit of a stretch to call it a huge electoral win.

Response to SocialDemocrat61 (Reply #60)

SocialDemocrat61

(6,418 posts)
62. Me too
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 06:54 PM
Monday

But keep things in perspective. Tuesday was a good night but really doesn’t change things. Last night was a bad night, but was only a short term setback. There are still more innings to go, if you will forgive the baseball analogy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...