General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (PeaceWave) on Tue Nov 11, 2025, 09:48 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
leftstreet
(38,208 posts)If the Democratic legislators trust Trump, we should too
Response to leftstreet (Reply #1)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
leftstreet
(38,208 posts)Schumer is basically throwing himself and abt 24 million ACA people under the bus
Schumer will get the blame as a caving, gutless, bad leader, but he's no stranger to that. A whole bunch of "progressive" members will make headlines assuring us he needs to be replaced.
The Democrats believe they'll gain an advantage electorally when the GOP refuses to make good on the ACA Subsidy Pinkie Promise
Bluetus
(1,893 posts)And then they all slap each other on the back and say "Anybody for a good drink? I'm buying."
SocialDemocrat61
(6,418 posts)So I dont think its fair to say hes caving. This is the responsibility of 10 senators who went rouge.
leftstreet
(38,208 posts)A leader who can't "lead" his people
SocialDemocrat61
(6,418 posts)But the 10 who went Rouge should be held chiefly responsible.
choie
(6,386 posts)They are bloody cowardly, self-serving hypocrites.
Trueblue1968
(18,946 posts)TheRealNorth
(9,647 posts)Our leaders are too smart to explain it to peasants like us in a way that we could comprehend.
Irish_Dem
(77,782 posts)JCMach1
(29,046 posts)orangecrush
(27,534 posts)BootinUp
(50,623 posts)Alpeduez21
(1,984 posts)Remember when he slept walked thought the debate?
Remember when he didn't want universal healthcare?
Remember when he didn't fight for school loan forgiveness?
Forced out my ass. EVERY FUCKING POLE SHOWED HIM LOSING TO TRUMP WORSE THAN KAMELA. Remember that?
BootinUp
(50,623 posts)irrelevant rant I couldn't care less if you don't understand the politics. I got my own concerns.
Baitball Blogger
(51,446 posts)Like Merrit Garlands way of thinking,
BlueKota
(4,883 posts)said after Mandami win, that the old guard needs to step aside to let those who want to lead the party forward do so.
yliza
(195 posts)It links a BlueSky thread from capitolhunters that makes the assertion that dems are going to cave sound suspect. Ill wait for confirmation before I get mad at Schumer.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220787624]
Edit: I added some context.
IbogaProject
(5,401 posts)But now it has been confirmed that there is a rare Sunday session underway so the previous concerns about the story's veracity are now moot.
yorkster
(3,563 posts)knowing that Jeffries is opposed and it won't pass the House?
SocialDemocrat61
(6,418 posts)Despite him saying that hes voting no.
yorkster
(3,563 posts)the heat knowing that the bill probably won't pass the house.
I have no idea, of course. Schumer's deal from Friday sounded good but the R's nixed it, naturally. It would have funded ACA credits for a year and the Dems could have run on that, warning that the R's would try again to end the credits for the ACA.
yorkster
(3,563 posts)Good.
Alpeduez21
(1,984 posts)There has been no talk of this going back to the house.
yorkster
(3,563 posts)back to the house.
Alpeduez21
(1,984 posts)I do know this has taken the wind right out of the sails from Tuesday's highs.
BlueKota
(4,883 posts)it has to go back to the House. The question remains if it does go back, will there be enough votes to pass it in the House. Jeffries is against it, but since tsf is apparently for it, likely the Republicans will all vote yes. Also we don't know whether there are any House Dems who will jump ship and vote yes.
choie
(6,386 posts)will remain opposed?
choie
(6,386 posts)He can't prevent the house to vote against it.
yorkster
(3,563 posts)Who knows?
yorkster
(3,563 posts)No one's happy about this.
BannonsLiver
(20,089 posts)Takket
(23,349 posts)not because everyone will vote for rethugs, but because too many people will just stay home if their choices are fascists, and quitters.
Prairie Gates
(6,796 posts)bigtree
(93,231 posts)...in order to call their bluff for everyone to see.
Of course they have. it's fucking standard political opposition, but the rub is a Dem electorate accustomed by troll after troll encouraging them to attack their own party instead.
It's something to behold, and you can count me out.
It's a binary political system with a dangerous party in control on one side and our Dems we managed to elect through all of the trolling on the other.
There isn't any Internet Outrage party that's going to make that equation any different. We can either bend the arc toward Democrats, or we can do this stupid outrage thing over politics that we have zero actual responsibility for managing as if our legislators were a meme or a monolith for internet gripers to take pot shots at instead of take the time to EVER support them.
Does anyone remember this republican party EVER trashing their party leaders for ANY political initiative? In the meantime, here we are claiming proposals are 'caves' as if the legislature was meant to be just some protest instead of governance.
As MOW organized Bayard Rustin wrote in his book, 'Strategies for Freedom,' activists often substitute and mistake volume and militancy for progress.
For a political movement to succeed, he wrote, it must have a legislative goal at the head of its advocacy to transform agitation into action.
Maybe turn down the volume against our own leaders charting a path forward, and point us to a legislative solution.
choie
(6,386 posts)ever capitulating?
EnergizedLib
(2,895 posts)Republicans are why things get worse. Democrats are why things dont get better.
So, so true.
choie
(6,386 posts)Interesting..
James48
(5,047 posts)She said its not right.
Hold firm!
EdmondDantes_
(1,142 posts)It's easy to say that they just have to hold out, but that has to be balanced against their obligations to federal workers, to people on SNAP, to people who need government services. I don't know how I'd vote in their position, but I know it's far more complicated than you're making it out to be.
yaesu
(8,807 posts)choie
(6,386 posts)Did we get anything "we" wanted? No. Because we know damn well the republicans are not going to vote for ACA subsidies.
I have a lot of clients in NY who are on SNAP, and they blame the republicans for this mess. They're not saying "please Democrats, compromise, like you always do"
EdmondDantes_
(1,142 posts)We simply don't have the votes to make Congress pass what we want. How long are you willing to let your clients go without SNAP? January 2027? What's going to change the makeup of Congress significantly before then?
did the Democrats not know that they would never get the votes? Did they think there'd be republicans who would stop marching in lock step? They knew that Federal workers were going to stop getting paychecks. They knew that SNAP recipients were going to have their SNAP benefits stopped. and if they didn't know, that's political malpractice.
EdmondDantes_
(1,142 posts)Sometimes you try a thing and it doesn't work. You don't stick with a plan that isn't winning. What was a prolonged shutdown going to gain? How was it going to change the math in Congress? Once they had a shutdown, is your position that they were obligated to keep it no matter what? Sometimes we lose. If we had collectively voted better in 2024, if Democrats in Congress and the Biden administration in 2022 hadn't extended the subsidies that were done for covid for 3 years in order to make it fit budget reconciliation in the Inflation Reduction Act or had adjusted things to make permanent changes to the ACA subsidies, we wouldn't be here now. Or if any number of other things that have put us in a weird position where most people get health insurance through work but not everyone and we have exploding healthcare costs, particularly the last few years.
But we are here and we have to deal with that. If Republicans were never going to extend the subsidies, then why continue the shutdown?
standingtall
(3,144 posts)200 billion was already cut from snap effective in 2026 so there already going to be people losing snap benefits and this will only enable them to make further cuts to it before Trump is gone. Open the Government with nothing in return. I guess so we can keep funding ice agents and the military occupying Cities and crush the momentum we had after the election. Stopping short term suffering without consideration of the long term suffering at the hands of the Trump administration is a gross miscalculation.
Response to EdmondDantes_ (Reply #29)
geojazz This message was self-deleted by its author.
yaesu
(8,807 posts)AverageOldGuy
(3,152 posts)I am absolutely, 100% disgusted at the Democratic Senate caucus for caving in return for absolutely nothing. What better sums up the Democratic Party than this?
Very slowly, glacially slow, the Democratic Party is realizing how to face Republicans.
But after a montheven iN the face of kicking Republicans ass on Tuesday in part because of the shutdownthere was just no way that weak ass losers like Tim Kaine (My Senator, Virginia) and Gary Peters and Jeanne Shaheen were going to have the courage to hold on. They simply care more about traveling by air than they do about the poor or about health care.
This is an absolutely clear 100% victory for Trump.
I ashamed of the Democratic Party leadership in Congress. Maybe it will change one day. Maybe we will still have a country worth saving at that time. Maybe I will outlive all these centrist shitheads.
yourout
(8,649 posts)RockRaven
(18,349 posts)EnergizedLib
(2,895 posts)But let them own everything. Our side caving is unacceptable.
yourout
(8,649 posts)Republican secret agents protecting against progressives.
Shipwack
(2,907 posts)The caving Democrats are scared.
They are scared that the GOP will ditch the filibuster to pass this legislation on their own.
This scares some Democrats because even if the filibuster is broken just for this one bill, it sets a precedent. It shows that if you want a law bad enough, you can get rid of the filibuster.
This means that the centrists a Third Way-ers will have no excuse to oppose progressive policies. They cant say Gosh darn, thats a great idea, but the Republicans wont allow it. Theyll just filibuster it. Too bad . Theyll then go back to counting their dark money from special interests.
flying-skeleton
(808 posts)These traitorous senators better have gotten rich from surrendering because they just ended their political careers and will have to live their lives in shame ‼️
I will donate to every one who primaries these traitors ‼️
FHRRK
(1,302 posts)The clock was ticking on the SNAP benefits.
48 hours and the Repubs lost even more leverage.
Lets take the worse case, the First District rules against Trump, he throws a fit and goes to the full SC. They fall inline for the immoral Repukes, then Schumer and the team of wimps at least have delivered a huge talking point. The Repubs and SC have screwed over millions of citizens while giving money to Argentina, spending billions on an airplane, building a ballroom, etc., so unfortunately to feed those in need we have no other option.
But for some reason, the Centrist Wimps couldnt wait. And for the life of me, I cant think of any good reason.
W T F
(1,184 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(6,418 posts)Democrats won elections in four coastal state, all of which went for Harris last year. Only in Virginia did a democrat replace a republican. Control of neither house of congress was overturned because they werent at play. While democrats had a good night on Tuesday, its a bit of a stretch to call it a huge electoral win.
Response to SocialDemocrat61 (Reply #60)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,418 posts)But keep things in perspective. Tuesday was a good night but really doesnt change things. Last night was a bad night, but was only a short term setback. There are still more innings to go, if you will forgive the baseball analogy.