General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWTF? BBC director general Tim Davie and News CEO Deborah Turness resign
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxktBBC director general Tim Davie and CEO of News Deborah Turness resign over a documentary about Donald Trump
The Telegraph published a leaked BBC memo suggesting a Panorama documentary edited two parts of Trump's speech together so he appeared to explicitly encourage the Capitol Hill riots of January 2021
The memo also criticised other areas of BBC News coverage
In a statement, Davie says: "There have been some mistakes made and as director general I have to take ultimate responsibility" - read it in full
In a separate statement, Turness says "the buck stops with me," describing the decision to step down as "difficult". She admits mistakes were made, but says allegations of institutional bias are "wrong"
-
That is why I stick with the UK Guardian .
That is all
Melon
(885 posts)Against trump or anyone, just report, dont edit the message. The BBC was globally trusted as being neutral.
spooky3
(38,132 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(105,192 posts)There's a good case that Trump was inciting the riot, but the programme took audio from about 50 minutes apart, and really did make it sound like it was all one sentence.
In his speech in Washington DC on 6 January 2021, Trump said: "We're going to walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women."
However, in the Panorama edit he was shown saying: "We're going to walk down to the Capitol... and I'll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell."
The two sections of the speech that were edited together were more than 50 minutes apart.
The "fight like hell" comment was taken from a section where Trump discussed how "corrupt" US elections were. In total, he used the words "fight" or "fighting" 20 times in the speech.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt?post=asset%3A9fc033c0-e3e2-4a3c-8f7c-f32585c47569#post
The trouble is that the corporations that want the BBC to fail (Telegraph, Murdoch, Mail) spend so much time trying to make the BBC look bad that when it does fuck up, it feels it has to wear sackcloth and ashes.
malaise
(291,003 posts)Makes sense
muriel_volestrangler
(105,192 posts)It's not like the people who would have watched it were US voters who'd be influenced by it; for the general "what do we in the UK think of Trump" evidence, there's loads of other stuff they could have run straight. And there doesn't seem to have been any public complaints about it at the time - someone noticed it at some time, and it turned up in this internal review.
TheProle
(3,840 posts)is an unforced error.
radical noodle
(10,432 posts)but they said that this "documentary" was a bridge too far. They don't like being lied to by the BBC because it undermines the network's credibility.