Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gab13by13

(30,625 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 07:48 AM Monday

People Can Give All The Reasons Why Democrats Had To Vote For The CR, But

I have one question; why do 9 Senate Democrats + Angus King get to decide policy for 259 Congressional Democrats?

We have 259 Democrats in Congress and 9 + King, and probably Schumer, made the call.

What does the rest of Congress do now, support the 10 or criticize them? Not good options, here we go again with Democrats are in disarray.

Remember what the KFF said; failure to renew the Obamacare subsidies will kill 50,000 people per year. Dems can tell those dead persons loved ones that it's OK, Democrats did it for the politics, Republicans will look bad and we can get reelected, that, by the way, was Schumer's policy back in March when he orchestrated voting for the CR, he said so on Chris Haye's show.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People Can Give All The Reasons Why Democrats Had To Vote For The CR, But (Original Post) gab13by13 Monday OP
Actually it was 7 and Angus King SocialDemocrat61 Monday #1
Actually it was 9+1 gab13by13 Monday #10
What two? SocialDemocrat61 Monday #12
We are the complete minority in Congress.... FarPoint Monday #2
That was Schumer's strategy back in March gab13by13 Monday #11
Because now they will have to reopen Congress FalloutShelter Monday #3
I don't hear Mike Johnson calling back the House.................. Lovie777 Monday #4
not likely markie Monday #5
Just getting the discharge petition passed gab13by13 Monday #13
We will not see the Epstein files pinkstarburst Monday #20
I have no idea of the big picture Taraman Monday #6
If you take that the majority should always get its way EdmondDantes_ Monday #7
Magats didn't have the votes in the Senate. gab13by13 Monday #14
But you have to admit that you want 259 votes making the policy for 273 votes (or 281 if you count the 9) EdmondDantes_ Monday #19
Ok, i agree that 10 senators should NOT make our policy. (i look at it like union members crossing a picket line). bluestarone Monday #23
The Magat Majority doesn't have enough votes to get whatever they want. Unless 9 Dems are willing Autumn Monday #16
How exactly is democracy not supposed to work that way? EdmondDantes_ Monday #18
How does a continued shutdown get us closer to renewed subsidies? tritsofme Monday #8
The people running the show gab13by13 Monday #15
Because Schumer can't hold his caucus together. Anyone think Pelosi would have allowed this? Nanjeanne Monday #9
I think they were the ones... S/V Loner Monday #17
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Monday #21
Oh, Senator Schumer, you've done it again. ( song from the musical "East Wing Story") usonian Monday #22

SocialDemocrat61

(6,420 posts)
1. Actually it was 7 and Angus King
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 07:52 AM
Monday

Two are retiring, three are not up for re-election until 28 and 2 not until 30.

gab13by13

(30,625 posts)
10. Actually it was 9+1
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:35 AM
Monday

2 Senate Democrats changed their vote to No. So my question is what changed in the agreement that made those 2 Dems not like the Bill?

If those 2 changed their vote because Democrats already had enough votes to pass the Bill that's not a good enough reason for me.

No, those 2 Democrats were on board to pass the CR.

SocialDemocrat61

(6,420 posts)
12. What two?
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:42 AM
Monday

Did they vote yes and then switch their votes before it was closed? Or were they just rumored to be voting yes?

FarPoint

(14,333 posts)
2. We are the complete minority in Congress....
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 07:53 AM
Monday

I'm okay with this as I understand weighing the essential life needs of the people first.....There are more steps, go to House, thus get our Arizona Congresswoman sworn in and bill also needs signed by dumpy...more can happen...

The evil mean and hateful, greedy actions all belong to the MAGA side....

gab13by13

(30,625 posts)
11. That was Schumer's strategy back in March
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:41 AM
Monday

Krasnov will burn it all down and then Democrats will win the next election. Krasnov got his CR back in March and then went on to get the Big Ugly Death Bill passed which gutted our social safety net. Krasnov doesn't need Congress now, he is in charge, he controls the purse strings, he has the Supreme Court to back him up.

Voting on a bill because it will get you reelected won't get you in JFK's book, "Profiles in Courage."

FalloutShelter

(13,978 posts)
3. Because now they will have to reopen Congress
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 07:56 AM
Monday

And will be required to swear in the new Congresswoman. Then we get the Epstein files and that is the coup de gras.
Destroy Trump now. In 2026 we get everything.
JMHO

Lovie777

(21,088 posts)
4. I don't hear Mike Johnson calling back the House..................
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:01 AM
Monday

probably in discussions with the WH, and Maxwell up for a pardon?

markie

(23,757 posts)
5. not likely
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:03 AM
Monday

although Grijalva should be seated... me thinks we are relying too much on the Epstein report.... which I have every confidence(?) will have been distorted and altered to hide... I assume there are numerous big names that will do ANYTHING to not be outed!!

gab13by13

(30,625 posts)
13. Just getting the discharge petition passed
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:44 AM
Monday

will keep Epstein/Krasnov on the front page. It will become obvious to the American people that Magats are protecting Epstein.

pinkstarburst

(1,832 posts)
20. We will not see the Epstein files
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 10:43 AM
Monday

They won't vote to release it.

If they do ever get to that point, what we will "see" will be a fake version, with 45 and every other high profile republican name taken out. But they'll be sure to leave Bill Clinton and anyone else who could damage democrats in there.

Trump will be like, see, I told you I had nothing to do with it.

I seriously don't get why everyone is so excited to see this "report." They're fixing it now, guys.

Taraman

(404 posts)
6. I have no idea of the big picture
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:11 AM
Monday

but emotionally, all of these Senate Democrats who caved need to be gone.

Among the people I talk to in my community, the Democrats are seen as spineless. This has to change.

EdmondDantes_

(1,142 posts)
7. If you take that the majority should always get its way
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:17 AM
Monday

Then you'd have to accept that as the majority in Congress and holding the White House, Republicans should get whatever they want right? Because before being Democrats or Republicans, we're all people and why should 259 of our elected officials get to dictate to the positions of 273 others since there's more of them. Elections have consequences, using budget reconciliation has consequences in that we didn't prioritize extending these enhanced covid era subsidies for longer over other priorities.

gab13by13

(30,625 posts)
14. Magats didn't have the votes in the Senate.
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:47 AM
Monday

I don't want 10 Senators making policy for 259.

Using the argument that we Democrats are the minority there is nothing we can do is a pathetic losing strategy.

EdmondDantes_

(1,142 posts)
19. But you have to admit that you want 259 votes making the policy for 273 votes (or 281 if you count the 9)
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 10:01 AM
Monday

Do you really not see how that's a contradictory argument that's logically inconsistent? It would be more honest if you said you don't care what the majority wants because you think that the position of the 259 is morally correct. But you can't logically say that I want the majority of a minority to get what it wants because it's the majority of the minority by eliminating the people who disagree with you from the count to make it seem like the majority is different.

bluestarone

(20,756 posts)
23. Ok, i agree that 10 senators should NOT make our policy. (i look at it like union members crossing a picket line).
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 11:04 AM
Monday

I have to also look at this as (it's really hard for me) maybe, just maybe this could cause outrage for the maga's, because even when we get the Democrat from Arizona sworn in, THAT only get it to the floor for a vote. Not sure how Mike handles that, but i'm thinking it will NOT pass the house. So, i'm thinking we will never see the Epstein report. Plus another shut down in January could, i repeat could put rethugs in trouble, because it's the election year. Now, i do NOT have any answers as to moving forward, but i'm not as pissed now as i was when i first heard about what happened. Lots of people getting help now that need it, that's for sure, We are in a very bad place, so i guess we have to suck it up and just move forward wherever we can. It's out of our hands i
m afraid. THIS is a tough one for me, and all of us here.

Autumn

(48,599 posts)
16. The Magat Majority doesn't have enough votes to get whatever they want. Unless 9 Dems are willing
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:31 AM
Monday

to join them to make sure they get it. American citizens are not supposed to be held hostage so the fucking Magat Majority gets what they want. It's not supposed to be that way. Fuck the excuses.

EdmondDantes_

(1,142 posts)
18. How exactly is democracy not supposed to work that way?
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:58 AM
Monday

That's literally the point of a democracy is that people vote and generally speaking, the most votes wins.

tritsofme

(19,727 posts)
8. How does a continued shutdown get us closer to renewed subsidies?
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:30 AM
Monday

I know some people are willing to extend the shutdown to the last federal worker’s foreclosed home, but it’s not going to make Republicans give concessions.

Under the deal, Senate Democrats will be the ones to offer the legislation that will be voted on to extend subsidies, if Republicans vote it down, they will fully own the ensuing chaos in the insurance market.

gab13by13

(30,625 posts)
15. The people running the show
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:52 AM
Monday

want unwashed Americans to be killed. Project 2025 wants to cull the herd, Russell Vought doesn't give a hoot how many people die, AI will take care of the rich. Krasnov has neutered Congress, he controls the purse strings with the help of the Supreme Court.

We will soon know the fate of Obamacare, will Congressional Magats do the right thing or will they do what Krasnov tells them?

Nanjeanne

(6,480 posts)
9. Because Schumer can't hold his caucus together. Anyone think Pelosi would have allowed this?
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:32 AM
Monday

Schumer was complicit. He wanted this but wanted to protect his own place since he got such flak last time.

Response to gab13by13 (Original post)

usonian

(22,371 posts)
22. Oh, Senator Schumer, you've done it again. ( song from the musical "East Wing Story")
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 10:46 AM
Monday

You've let a bunch of traitors serve the king and his men.



With you as our leader,

We found a new way

To fight and lose another day.

Captain of the Titanic: "T'is merely a scratch."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People Can Give All The R...