Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Nevilledog

(54,694 posts) Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:45 AM Monday

🚨Same sex marriage safe for now. SCOTUS refuses to hear case about Obergefell

Link to tweet

Kyle Griffin
@kylegriffin1
·
Follow
Reuters: U.S. SUPREME COURT REJECTS CASE THAT THREATENED ITS LANDMARK 2015 RULING RECOGNIZING A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE

Edit.....in my rush to post this good news I screwed up the case.... Obergefell, not Griswold

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

🚨Same sex marriage safe for now. SCOTUS refuses to hear case about Obergefell (Original Post) Nevilledog Monday OP

At least there's one bit of unquestionably good news. EdmondDantes_ Monday #1

Thank God -- I couldn't handle that, too this week obamanut2012 Monday #2

Picture the disappointment of that hate-full adulterous creepy clerk Easterncedar Monday #3

EdmondDantes_

(1,142 posts)

1. At least there's one bit of unquestionably good news.

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:50 AM

Monday

Although maybe that was a factor of the specific case being the idiot Kim Davis not wanting to do her job and sign marriage licenses not specifically about same sex marriage. But for today and the millions of same sex marriages, this is good.

obamanut2012

(29,028 posts)

2. Thank God -- I couldn't handle that, too this week

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:51 AM

Monday

Easterncedar

(5,263 posts)

3. Picture the disappointment of that hate-full adulterous creepy clerk

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Mon Nov 10, 2025, 10:03 AM

Monday

Enjoy the moment.

Reply to this discussion