Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans want National Abortion Restrictions
In exchange for extension of ACA subsidies that will just expire in September 2026 but not the abortion restrictions will be permanent.
Thats what were going to negotiate, Thune told reporters before the Senate passed the bill to end the government shutdown. A one-year extension along the lines of what [Democrats] are suggesting, and without Hyde protections theres just not even, doesnt even get close.
Thunes demand for more stringent abortion limits on Obamacare money is backed by colleagues, including Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., an outspoken proponent of extending the ACA funds, as well as Sens. Steve Daines, R-Mont., and Mike Lee, R-Utah.
Rounds warned that you wont get any Republican votes to extend the money without more stringent abortion limitations.
Thunes demand for more stringent abortion limits on Obamacare money is backed by colleagues, including Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., an outspoken proponent of extending the ACA funds, as well as Sens. Steve Daines, R-Mont., and Mike Lee, R-Utah.
Rounds warned that you wont get any Republican votes to extend the money without more stringent abortion limitations.
Republicans are now rehashing the same blackmail as they just did. Hopefully no Democrat in the Senate falls for the same blackmail.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans want National Abortion Restrictions (Original Post)
angrychair
Tuesday
OP
Irish_Dem
(77,782 posts)1. We are back to the Garland argument.
Three explanations:
Innocent, let it happen, made it happen.
FHRRK
(1,302 posts)2. There's an argument?
Please, you are being way too kind.
Coventina
(28,905 posts)3. Gee, whatever happened to "the states should decide"?
They couldn't possibly be hypocrites, could they?
drmeow
(5,827 posts)4. That's because
deep down they know that the world would have been a better place if they had been aborted and that scares them.