Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(132,267 posts)
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 09:58 PM Feb 26

SAVE has rules that States have to funnel voter data to D.C.

Another reason to call your Senator and tell them to vote "No" on the SAVE Act.

3/ Thank you to @buckscountybeacon.com for publishing my new article about the Trump-backed so-called “Save America Act” & why it threatens election security nationwide. #ProtectOurVotes #NoOnSAVE

Jenny Cohn (@jennycohn.bsky.social) 2026-02-26T22:42:04.581Z
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SAVE has rules that States have to funnel voter data to D.C. (Original Post) applegrove Feb 26 OP
Will we get the actual bill as it is being pursued so voters can see the details? Deuxcents Feb 26 #1
I don't know how to see the bill. I'm in Canada. applegrove Feb 26 #2
HR 7296 dweller Feb 26 #4
Thank you. Bookmarked Deuxcents Feb 26 #7
Actually , this is Senate version dweller Feb 26 #8
Well, I'm counting on that 0% Deuxcents Feb 26 #9
"Why the Trump-Backed Save America Act Threatens Election Security Nationwide" FakeNoose Feb 26 #3
will not pass.................. Lovie777 Feb 26 #5
Kick dalton99a Feb 26 #6
Voter registration data is public information. Ms. Toad Feb 26 #10
Then why would they put it in an Act? I mean if it is public information applegrove Feb 26 #11
No idea. Ms. Toad Feb 26 #12
Does it include 4 digits of social security numbers? applegrove Feb 26 #13
I don't recall. Ms. Toad Feb 26 #14
No problem. I am on my phone and do not want to download that much data. applegrove Feb 26 #15
I don't remember how long it took to download my county - Ms. Toad Feb 27 #16
Here's an explanation Quiet Em Feb 27 #19
Yes, but the GQP wants the SAVE system (controlled by Noem) to be final arbiter of whether AZJonnie Feb 27 #17
My response was directed at what the OP called out - Ms. Toad Feb 27 #22
I meant for my post to be simply an addendum to what you were saying, I see now it was not the best phrasing AZJonnie Feb 27 #23
I think the issue was using the data base to filter the rolls. dsc Feb 27 #18
...or see who doesn't vote and is registered, voila! Voted MaeScott Feb 27 #20
That is an issue, Ms. Toad Feb 27 #21

dweller

(28,426 posts)
8. Actually , this is Senate version
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 10:28 PM
Feb 26

It’s identical to House version
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/119/s3752/text

According to Govtrack , it has 0% of being enacted .



✌🏻

FakeNoose

(41,693 posts)
3. "Why the Trump-Backed Save America Act Threatens Election Security Nationwide"
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 10:08 PM
Feb 26

Link: https://buckscountybeacon.com/2026/02/why-the-trump-backed-save-america-act-threatens-election-security-nationwide/

Buried in the legislation is a mandate requiring every state to funnel voter data into a centralized voter-purge system plagued by security and accuracy concerns and controlled by the Trump administration.

by Jennifer Cohn | February 26, 2026

A foundational rule of computer security is to never create a “single point of failure,” meaning a centralized system or node whose compromise would cause widespread damage. In a country that relies on computers to run elections and maintain voter rolls, that principle is crucial. No American election should depend on a centralized chokepoint that a corrupt insider, reckless contractor, or hacker could exploit or expose to disrupt voting nationwide.

Yet that is precisely what the Trump-backed so-called “Save America Act” would do. Buried in the bill is a little-noticed mandate requiring every state to transmit its complete voter registration rolls to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS)—currently led by Kristi Noem—for screening through the agency’s much-criticized “SAVE” voter-purge system. This would result in an unprecedented concentration of power and risk inside a single system controlled by the Trump administration.

The legislation mandates (on page 15, Section 4(b)) that within 30 days of enactment, each state “shall submit” its official list of registered voters to the DHS for comparison through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements system, or SAVE, to identify and remove alleged noncitizens after “notice” and an “opportunity” to provide documentary proof of citizenship.

The bill does not define what constitutes adequate notice or how long voters would have to respond. In practice, those supposed protections could prove illusory. As far as I can tell, not a single Republican lawmaker has informed the public that the Save America Act would compel all 50 states to send their voter registration rolls to the DHS or that the DHS would then run the rolls through its “SAVE” voter purge system.
- more at link -

Holy shit!!!!

Ms. Toad

(38,655 posts)
10. Voter registration data is public information.
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 10:38 PM
Feb 26

Surprised how many people believe it is private.

applegrove

(132,267 posts)
11. Then why would they put it in an Act? I mean if it is public information
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 10:48 PM
Feb 26

why is it not in D.C. now?

Ms. Toad

(38,655 posts)
12. No idea.
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 10:53 PM
Feb 26

But here's the link to Ohio's data - available to everyone with internet. It contains name, registration date, birth date, party affiliation, address, and which elections you've voted in (maybe even more information- its been a month or so since I checked). https://www6.ohiosos.gov/ords/f?p=VOTERFTP:HOME::::::

Feel free to download data and check.

Every state has some version of this. How it is accessed varies somewhat by state, but it is publicly available. Those lists are how party get-out-the vote efforts work, postcard campaigns, etc. That's where the data comes from - it isn't just random calls or mailings - voters who vote in the Democratic primary, for example, but don't vote regularly (which can be identified from the party affiliation and the voting record) are targeted for GOTV efforts.

Ms. Toad

(38,655 posts)
14. I don't recall.
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 11:04 PM
Feb 26

Each state collects, and makes available, slightly different data. Pretty much universal is name, address, primary ballots voted, voting record (which elections you've voted in), registration date.

You could download a county from the link I sent and check. (I downloaded my county a while ago. I'm not being evasive - I just don't remember and have already deleted the file.)

applegrove

(132,267 posts)
15. No problem. I am on my phone and do not want to download that much data.
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 11:51 PM
Feb 26

I'll leave my op up.

Ms. Toad

(38,655 posts)
16. I don't remember how long it took to download my county -
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 12:00 AM
Feb 27

I checked every few minutes and it was still downloading, so I forgot about it and went back later in the day to check on it.

Quiet Em

(2,942 posts)
19. Here's an explanation
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 10:13 AM
Feb 27
The DOJ power grab could kick eligible voters off the rolls
The DOJ is claiming authority under the National Voting Rights Act (NVRA) and Civil Rights Act of 1960 to try to seize state voter data. It is weaponizing laws that were passed to protect the vote in order to try to suppress it. While the NVRA and the Civil Rights Act do give the DOJ some limited authority to oversee states’ list maintenance procedures, as a federal court recently held, they do not give the DOJ the power to demand states’ full, unredacted voter rolls or to select voters to be kicked off the rolls.

The Constitution gives states the authority to run elections, not the federal government, and states have reliable processes to maintain voter rolls on an ongoing basis — bipartisan consensus agrees on this. Nevertheless, a draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sent to more than a dozen states would give the DOJ the power to handpick voters for removal, an unprecedented move that could give the agency boundless power beyond its scope, and leave hundreds or thousands of people disenfranchised.


https://protectdemocracy.org/work/dojs-attempt-to-acquire-state-voter-data-explained/

AZJonnie

(3,707 posts)
17. Yes, but the GQP wants the SAVE system (controlled by Noem) to be final arbiter of whether
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 01:17 AM
Feb 27

a voter is removed from the roles. Sure, the Feds could get that information anytime, but this is taking their authority to conduct purges to another level.

Ms. Toad

(38,655 posts)
22. My response was directed at what the OP called out -
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 12:08 PM
Feb 27

Sending the voter information to the Feds. There have been a number of posts recently expressing outrage about the feds potentially getting their hands on voter information.

I agree that the feds have no business purging state voter rosters.

My point was solely to point out/repeat the information that voter rosters are public information, since I've seen a lot of posts recently indication people believe it is private.

AZJonnie

(3,707 posts)
23. I meant for my post to be simply an addendum to what you were saying, I see now it was not the best phrasing
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 03:35 PM
Feb 27

I knew what you meant/why you were making that particular point, friend, and I of all people love that sort of post, clarifications on underlying facts are always good

Ms. Toad

(38,655 posts)
21. That is an issue,
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 12:03 PM
Feb 27

But that is not what the OP (and many others recently have specifically called out - and have been outraged about)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SAVE has rules that State...