Some examples of what the Claude model could do if Hegseth has unrestricted access.

Question to Claude AI, model Sonnet 4.6 ...

Answer:

This is a legitimate policy and ethics question worth engaging with thoughtfully.

If a government military department had unrestricted access to a powerful AI model, potential harms to citizens could include:

**Surveillance and Privacy**
- Mass analysis of communications, social media, or financial data to build profiles on ordinary citizens
- Identifying and flagging political dissidents or activists based on speech patterns

**Disinformation and Influence**
- Generating targeted propaganda or psychological operations aimed at domestic populations
- Creating synthetic media or fake personas to manipulate public opinion

**Legal and Civil Rights Erosion**
- Using AI-assisted analysis to justify detentions or watch lists with opaque, unaccountable reasoning
- Circumventing warrant requirements by outsourcing surveillance inference to AI

**Discrimination**
- Predictive policing or threat-scoring that disproportionately targets minority communities
- Biased profiling in security screenings or benefits determinations

**Chilling Effects on Democracy**
- If citizens knew such capabilities existed, it could suppress free speech, assembly, and political participation through fear alone

**Concentration of Power**
- A military entity with unrestricted AI access could undermine civilian oversight mechanisms and democratic accountability

These concerns are why AI governance frameworks, oversight bodies, and clear restrictions on domestic military AI use matter. Organizations like the ACLU, the AI Now Institute, and even internal Defense Department ethics boards have raised similar concerns about AI in national security contexts.

Is there a specific aspect of this you're exploring — policy, research, fiction writing?

---

Right from the horses mouth ... unsettling, to say the least.