Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(61,647 posts)
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 01:22 AM 4 hrs ago

Major investor is 'shocked and sad' that the games industry is 'demonizing' generative AI

Last edited Sat Mar 14, 2026, 03:50 AM - Edit history (1)

Oh, the poor venture capitalists...

https://www.pcgamer.com/software/ai/major-investor-is-shocked-and-sad-that-the-games-industry-is-demonizing-generative-ai/

In a theater set off to the side of this week's Game Developers Conference, representatives from big tech companies and venture capital firms spoke about, among other things, their enthusiasm for generative AI. Many of the attendees over in the main convention halls don't feel the same way: 52% of respondents to a recent GDC survey said that they think generative AI is bad for the games industry, and only 7% agreed that it's a good thing.

-snip-

During a group discussion about how the games industry can "capitalize on shifting trends in customer engagement," Baier-Lentz said that he's "shocked and sad" that the industry has not embraced generative AI, noting that the gaming business has previously pushed new technology forward. He accused anti-AI game developers of "demonizing" a "marvelous new technology."

-snip-

As for why there's so much negative sentiment around AI among game developers, Baier-Lentz reckons that after record layoffs in the wake of the Covid hiring boom, people are worried about their jobs.

Yeah, I'd say that's one of the reasons they don't like it! Others include the use of artists' work without consent, environmental issues, the quality of AI output, and the feeling that automating culture production can only result in what is now commonly called "AI slop."

-snip-



Link to the Jan. 29 story about that survey:

https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/more-than-half-of-game-developers-now-think-generative-ai-is-bad-for-the-industry-a-dramatic-increase-from-just-2-years-ago-id-rather-quit-the-industry-than-use-generative-ai/

Over 50% of game developers now think generative AI is bad for the industry, a dramatic increase from just 2 years ago: 'I'd rather quit the industry than use generative AI'
News
By Tyler Wilde published January 29, 2026
The latest GDC survey also found that managers are more likely to use generative AI than their employees.


According to a survey of game developers published by GDC—the annual industry conference happening in San Francisco this March—33% of game dev professionals use generative AI for their work. This hasn't changed much since 2021, when GDC reported that 31% of devs use generative AI, but how they feel about it has dramatically shifted.

This year, 52% of the more than 2,300 respondents said that they "think generative AI is having a negative impact on the game industry," according to the report's author, Beth Elderkin, who notes that just 18% said the same thing two years ago, and 30% last year.

The opposite opinion, that generative AI is good for the industry, was only found in 7% of this year's respondents, a decline from 13% last year. The people least likely to approve of generative AI are who you'd expect: artists, designers, writers, and programmers.

-snip-

"Our standing rule is: If one of us brings up using GenAI in any of our work, then it's safe to assume we've been assimilated by The Thing and should be burned alive by Kurt Russell," said a game design consultant in the US.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Major investor is 'shocked and sad' that the games industry is 'demonizing' generative AI (Original Post) highplainsdem 4 hrs ago OP
AI is like any other technology RandySF 4 hrs ago #1
Keeping voice actors canetoad 4 hrs ago #2
Can we stop picking anti-social jerks as role models? Fichefinder 3 hrs ago #3
I think that many are using AI but not letting it be fully known flamingdem 3 hrs ago #4
What a brainless piece of shit.nt jfz9580m 2 hrs ago #5
There is no upside to getting into bed with AI (unless you own the AI) ToxMarz 2 hrs ago #6
Creatives ambivalent toward the technology that will eat their labor for free and shit out slop? How could this happen? 0rganism 2 hrs ago #7
Slop AND a risk of the gradual flattening of creative output. Beartracks 1 hr ago #8

Fichefinder

(420 posts)
3. Can we stop picking anti-social jerks as role models?
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 02:30 AM
3 hrs ago

Can we start admiring people who know when they have enough.

flamingdem

(40,853 posts)
4. I think that many are using AI but not letting it be fully known
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 02:39 AM
3 hrs ago

This way they can continue to be paid and keep their jobs.

It's just too enticing to save hours of time say creating a background image and I don't believe they're that purist.

And that's how it should be used. To help creatives focus on the important stuff and do less drudge work.

ToxMarz

(2,894 posts)
6. There is no upside to getting into bed with AI (unless you own the AI)
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 03:37 AM
2 hrs ago

It's really cool and helpful until it steals everything it can learn from you, your business, your industry. Then it doesn't need you anymore, and no one else does either. It's like this snake I read about in some garden some where with an apple it was trying to get everyone to eat.

0rganism

(25,589 posts)
7. Creatives ambivalent toward the technology that will eat their labor for free and shit out slop? How could this happen?
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 03:58 AM
2 hrs ago

Goodness no! Say it isn't so!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Major investor is 'shocke...