General Discussion

sheshe2

(97,674 posts) Wed Mar 18, 2026, 05:26 PM Mar 18

WARNER: So you chose to omit the parts that contradicts the president

WARNER: You omitted a paragraph about Midnight Hammer 'obliterating' Iran's nuclear capability that's in your written report from your oral opening

GABBARD: I recognized the time was running long

WARNER: So you chose to omit the parts that contradicts the president
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-03-18T15:05:20.615Z

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WARNER: So you chose to omit the parts that contradicts the president (Original Post) sheshe2 Mar 18 OP

Isn't she under oath? Wait..guess it doesn't matter to her Deuxcents Mar 18 #1

Being "under oath" makes no difference. Scruffy1 Mar 18 #2

Gabbard was careful to not perjure herself. I have considered her to be a Russian asset since she entered politics. ShazamIam Mar 18 #6

So simple, yet so hard. BidenRocks Mar 18 #3

Every single one of this Administration is a Liar!!! Dan Mar 18 #4

Hey....this can't be the Tulsi Gabbard who ran in the Democratic party primaries is it? LiberalLovinLug Mar 18 #5

K&R UTUSN Mar 18 #7

Deuxcents

(26,998 posts)

1. Isn't she under oath? Wait..guess it doesn't matter to her

Reply to sheshe2 (Original post)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 05:40 PM

Mar 18

Scruffy1

(3,534 posts)

2. Being "under oath" makes no difference.

Reply to Deuxcents (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 07:28 PM

Mar 18

It's illegal to knowingly lie to Congress. The knowingly part requires proof that you knew better.

ShazamIam

(3,134 posts)

6. Gabbard was careful to not perjure herself. I have considered her to be a Russian asset since she entered politics.

Reply to Scruffy1 (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 08:29 PM

Mar 18

BidenRocks

(3,284 posts)

3. So simple, yet so hard.

Reply to sheshe2 (Original post)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 07:56 PM

Mar 18

They are all guilty of REAL un-American activities!

NEW YORK CITY!!! ...

Dan

(5,195 posts)

4. Every single one of this Administration is a Liar!!!

Reply to sheshe2 (Original post)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 08:02 PM

Mar 18

LiberalLovinLug

(14,693 posts)

5. Hey....this can't be the Tulsi Gabbard who ran in the Democratic party primaries is it?

Reply to sheshe2 (Original post)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 08:16 PM

Mar 18

Who's main platform was NO WARS of choice. And accused her fellow competitors of being warmongers.

Now she's covering up for a mad king who's attacked multiple countries, and started a major war against Iran?

Naw, can't be

UTUSN

(77,795 posts)

7. K&R

Reply to sheshe2 (Original post)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 10:29 PM

Mar 18

Reply to this discussion