Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 06:12 AM 8 hrs ago

New US Congress bill proposal requires all operating system providers to verify ages

We've covered here before on individual US states setting up their own age verification laws, and now a new US Congress bill has been proposed for it. If passed, this would then potentially set it all up to be nation-wide across the entirety of the US.

It's being sponsored by the Democratic party's Josh Gottheimer, with it being co-sponsored by Republican Elise M. Stefanik so it has bipartisan support.


Read The Rest At GamingOnLinux

The Dumbass Bill Itself

Josh Gottheimer (D, NJ)
(202) 225-4465
(201) 389-1100
(973) 940-1117
(973) 814-4076

Cosponsor:

Elise M. Stefanik (R, NY)
(202) 225-4611
(518) 561-2324
(315) 541-2670
(518) 242-4707

If this passes it'll be the deathknell of personal computing.

Hoard what you can now folks because the next phase of the internet/computing will be highly censored, under high surveillance.

Computers will no longer be gateways to unfettered information.

Eventually this will extend to the internet, and almost every website will require photo ID to access.

This has been the plan all along and it is Nazi as fuck.

And that's not nearly all... Phones use an OS, your gaming system runs in an OS, your TV likely has an OS, a lot of appliances have an OS, even new toasters have an OS.

Huge swaths of the individual components comprising the architecture of The Internet have their own OS within the component.

Consider, there’s hundreds, maybe thousands, of various hobbyists out there who distribute pre-configured containers or standalone OS images. There are about 100 different flavors of Linux for ADS-B receivers, usually running on a raspberry pi.

Stupid as fuck. I'm pissed as hell one of ours signed onto to this fucking travesty.




41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New US Congress bill proposal requires all operating system providers to verify ages (Original Post) MayReasonRule 8 hrs ago OP
Why should internet browing ensure anonymonity? SSJVegeta 8 hrs ago #1
Your isp can disclose your identity UpInArms 8 hrs ago #2
This Bill's Requirements Would Change That Game Entirely MayReasonRule 8 hrs ago #4
And between the "Save" Act and ICE abductions TommyT139 8 hrs ago #6
ISP knows the address, but not the user's identity, since numerous people can connect from an address. (nt) thesquanderer 5 hrs ago #24
There Are Tons Of Identifying Factors From Mac Addresses To IMEI Numbers, Each Fingerprinting The Device MayReasonRule 5 hrs ago #27
Right to privacy Blues Heron 8 hrs ago #3
This Applies To All Devices With An Operating System MayReasonRule 8 hrs ago #5
For the same reason your library assures it . Trueblue Texan 8 hrs ago #7
They ruled on Roe v. Wade, too. littlemissmartypants 7 hrs ago #8
Answering the question of why it should be expected... Trueblue Texan 2 hrs ago #37
Goodbye whistleblowers and shared use of computers. Chinese control system. lostnfound 7 hrs ago #10
I'm not sure I understand the question angrychair 5 hrs ago #20
They claim it's about protecting KIDS??? REALLY? Liars or fools. Absolute bull pucky. lostnfound 7 hrs ago #9
Slightly related question: how do bots get past age checks on social media? muriel_volestrangler 7 hrs ago #11
buy from Argentina Tetrachloride 7 hrs ago #12
Meh, I age verify online already OC375 7 hrs ago #13
you miss the point. which is why this bill exists dave99 6 hrs ago #14
And, it won't be a big deal... OldBaldy1701E 6 hrs ago #16
Very Well Said! MayReasonRule 1 hr ago #39
Please post your entire browser history here for our review Orrex 6 hrs ago #19
How do you verify your age? angrychair 5 hrs ago #21
The Applicable Phrase Is "Oh My Sweet Summer Child" MayReasonRule 5 hrs ago #28
Thin provisioning is coming soon RetiredParatrooper 6 hrs ago #15
It's scary seeing replies on a liberal site defending this. SamuelAdams 6 hrs ago #17
This Is Much Worse Than Fake Security For Children MayReasonRule 5 hrs ago #29
I did not realize the implications of this bill until reading Dr. T 6 hrs ago #18
This is scary Nazi shit in real life angrychair 5 hrs ago #25
"Age Verification Laws Seeek To Erase LGBTQ+ Identity" Ms Magazine niyad 5 hrs ago #22
This could bite both ways 3825-87867 5 hrs ago #23
This idea is so much bullshit LPBBEAR 5 hrs ago #26
Your Response Is Well Informed And Dead On Point MayReasonRule 5 hrs ago #30
I agree with everything you said... angrychair 4 hrs ago #32
This isn't practical either angrychair 4 hrs ago #31
I'm also an operating system (and networking, and application) expert of 40+ years dickthegrouch 3 hrs ago #35
DURec leftstreet 4 hrs ago #33
Unconstitutional on its face dickthegrouch 4 hrs ago #34
This feels a lot like Al Gore and music labeling Johonny 2 hrs ago #36
We're Not Gonna' Take It! MayReasonRule 2 hrs ago #38
Ugh. While there are ways that would minimize privacy concerns EdmondDantes_ 1 hr ago #40
The Entire Point Is To Surveil Every Fucking Interaction That Anyone Has With Anything MayReasonRule 35 min ago #41

UpInArms

(55,060 posts)
2. Your isp can disclose your identity
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 06:41 AM
8 hrs ago

You do not have to put in your state issued identification to use a browser

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
4. This Bill's Requirements Would Change That Game Entirely
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 06:49 AM
8 hrs ago

This Bill would require OS providers (e.g., Apple, Google, Microsoft; plus anyone who “develops, licenses, or controls” an OS such as loading an OS on raspberry pi) to verify users’ ages when setting up a new device, instead of self‑attested DOB fields.

The only practical way to “verify” age at scale will be ID‑based or third‑party identity providers, creating de facto mandatory identity for using general‑purpose computers and phones.

This bill is moving from “every bar checks ID at the door” to “your driver’s license is checked once when you buy the car, and then the car tells every business what age bracket you belong to forever."

TommyT139

(2,410 posts)
6. And between the "Save" Act and ICE abductions
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 06:54 AM
8 hrs ago

...who knows what even will count as legitimate govt ID?

thesquanderer

(13,046 posts)
24. ISP knows the address, but not the user's identity, since numerous people can connect from an address. (nt)
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:40 AM
5 hrs ago

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
27. There Are Tons Of Identifying Factors From Mac Addresses To IMEI Numbers, Each Fingerprinting The Device
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 10:02 AM
5 hrs ago

That's just the bare tip of the turd.

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
5. This Applies To All Devices With An Operating System
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 06:52 AM
8 hrs ago

Your phone, your appliances, your car.

This is Nazi Orwellianism.

Trueblue Texan

(4,524 posts)
37. Answering the question of why it should be expected...
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 12:53 PM
2 hrs ago

For the same privacy rules cited re libraries. Don't ask me to rationalize SCOTUS's refusal to respect precedent.I got nuthin' for that.

angrychair

(12,352 posts)
20. I'm not sure I understand the question
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:13 AM
5 hrs ago

Why are you using a pseudonym here on DU?
This bill, if it become law, is you telling the government who you are and allowing it to track whom you associate with and what you say and do on the Internet. It also allows the government to block your ability to access the Internet if you do not comply. It gives the government full control over what you see and do on your computer or phone or anything that connects to the Internet.

It is incredibly dramatic invasion of privacy and chilling of free speech and association.

lostnfound

(17,538 posts)
9. They claim it's about protecting KIDS??? REALLY? Liars or fools. Absolute bull pucky.
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 07:14 AM
7 hrs ago

This is being done for totalitarian control, that is all. Total surveillance.
If they cared about kids, Epstein would have been in jail 25 years ago….and a whole lot of powerful people along with him.
If they cared about kids, many victims would not have been victims.

They LIE.
And going along with this in the hopes that it will protect kids is just naive.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,338 posts)
11. Slightly related question: how do bots get past age checks on social media?
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 07:22 AM
7 hrs ago

With Australia having an age limit on the major social media platforms, they must have installed some kind of checks. What does a bot do? And is the easiest way for a kid to access them to pretend to be a bot?

OC375

(1,067 posts)
13. Meh, I age verify online already
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 07:46 AM
7 hrs ago

Not seeing the big deal. It’s not your SSN. Millions share my DOB. This just keeps people from lying to get around it. Age restrictions exist for reasons. Assail the reasons if you don’t like age barriers.

OldBaldy1701E

(11,267 posts)
16. And, it won't be a big deal...
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 08:24 AM
6 hrs ago

Until you lose your identity to the because it is so easily accessible.

You have no idea how lenient the internet has been in regards to operations without personal identification.

In short, there will be no internet, and no DU, if this is allowed.

Unless you want the DU member list to be perused by the Feds on a daily basis. And, their visits to find out what you meant with every single post. And, arrests for not being nice to the President and his cabinet. And, your identity being passed around on the internet with a bit of a quote that is taken out of context, but definitely came from your account. And, being fired by your employer because your accounts were hacked and since they know who you are, they just blame everything that the hacker does with your account on you, since they know who the account belongs to. And, being arrested as a pedo because you accidentally clicked on a picture that you were trying to scroll past and since they know exactly who you are, they decide you must be looking at CP and come for you. All because you have no expectation of privacy anywhere on the net, and the people who passed this shit will be constantly trying to arrest anyone who does not worship them, thanks to this new crap.

Is that okay with you?

Because, I have to say... I am not a fan. I know how much they get away with as things stand now. It will get 1000 times worse if they pass this.

Do you like getting salespeople calling you about stuff because your viewing habits are connected to your name and they used their algorithms to deduce that you must like this stuff and therefore need to be flooded with offers about it? That would just be the tip of the iceberg.

Orrex

(67,206 posts)
19. Please post your entire browser history here for our review
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 08:48 AM
6 hrs ago

retroactive to the first time you used the internet.

It’s absurd that anyone thinks this is a good idea, or that it’s no big deal.

angrychair

(12,352 posts)
21. How do you verify your age?
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:25 AM
5 hrs ago

Are you currently uploading an image of your state or federal identification? Because they is what they mean.
You are not just pressing a button that says "I'm over 21" you are uniquely identifying yourself and where you go and what you say on the Internet is ties to you.

As it stands, the government is currently trying to force Reddit to reveal the identity of a poster because he was critical of (frozen water) and they consider that a crime.
If this was already law they would just know who the person is and can then go arrest people who are critical of them.

This website would die overnight. They could just come are you if you are critical of the government or corporation that is favored by the government.

It is incredibly dramatic invasion of privacy and chilling of free speech and free association.

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
28. The Applicable Phrase Is "Oh My Sweet Summer Child"
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 10:03 AM
5 hrs ago

Ignorance is most definitely not bliss.

Read into a bit.

Bet you'll change your mind.

SamuelAdams

(78 posts)
17. It's scary seeing replies on a liberal site defending this.
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 08:34 AM
6 hrs ago

The government is saying they need to be able to track what everyone does with any connected devices and some "Democrats" thinks that's a great idea. Do you all realize Leave It To Beaver wasn't a documentary? Kids got bullied in school before the internet. There were porno mags and movies before the internet. Kids accessed them and snuck into R-rated movies. Maybe we should try policing kids' access to guns as much as we're trying to police their thoughts.

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
29. This Is Much Worse Than Fake Security For Children
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 10:05 AM
5 hrs ago

This is the largest Orwellian surveillance attempt to date.

This is orders of magnitude above and beyond what has already been done.

Dr. T

(660 posts)
18. I did not realize the implications of this bill until reading
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 08:47 AM
6 hrs ago

the comments to this post. DU'ers are the best at sniffing out fascist bullshit.

angrychair

(12,352 posts)
25. This is scary Nazi shit in real life
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:41 AM
5 hrs ago

This website will become a ghost town if it passes.

One day, in the future, hopefully we will all be around to see it, a book and study done to figure out how the Republicans went from "a government small enough to drown in a bathtub" to "government big enough to control almost every aspect of your life ie fascism"

niyad

(132,978 posts)
22. "Age Verification Laws Seeek To Erase LGBTQ+ Identity" Ms Magazine
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:26 AM
5 hrs ago

25 February 2025

Will also restrict abortion information access and more.

(sorry, cannot link, but the title will get you there)

I am so disheartened to see defense of these bills on a Democratic site. Those defending these bills might want to take a look at just who is proposing them, and why.

Also read The Guardian article "The World Wants To Ban Social Media For Children, B
But There Will Be Grave Consequences For Us All" Taylor Lorenz, 2 March 2026

Come on, people. We can do better.

3825-87867

(1,972 posts)
23. This could bite both ways
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:33 AM
5 hrs ago

Since the Gov uses Microsoft for 98% of its computing, I guess anyone using theose services will have to "Register?"
Maybe like:
FBI
ICE
Representatives
Senators
Lobbyists
All Cabinet Members and Staff
All Right Wing Sites! Hehe heh
And LOTS more!

This can open up privacy to a hell of a lot of people, execs, CEOs, Banks etc who don't want their info known and possible info on THEIR families and relatives and will claim to need exceptions. And many of "us" old time users" know what can be gleaned, "legally or not", "covertly or not" from such simple data.

Looking forward to the personal info on FOX TV People and others like Jones, Bannon and myriad others on the right.
Once these people realize the implications to them you will see the bill go down.

LPBBEAR

(664 posts)
26. This idea is so much bullshit
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:56 AM
5 hrs ago

That a Democrat is a sponsor on this crap shows how bad some in our party are (Fetterman cough cough)

The only ways this can happen is by forcing it at hardware levels or at entries to the Internet.

At the hardware level by introducing into the Bios a age verification prompt to start the computer OS. The Internet Open Source community will immediately work around it with Open Source Bios replacements, which BTW already exist. The response to that will be to try to force hardware manufacturers to block access to the Bios which will then lead to consumers being unable to easily install firmware updates to computer systems and devices. All eventually leading to a huge backlash by unhappy consumers and a growth of Open Source hardware alternatives and Bios replacements.

At the ISP level by forcing users in this country to use a login prompt before entering the Internet. Trying to mandate that will obsolete every firewall/router currently in use and cause havoc with manufacturers which may partly explain the recent effort by the Trump administration to block foreign made firewall/routers.

In any event what this really is underneath is an move towards total censorship and a loss of personal freedoms for the average computer user.

Its bullshit.

Its a very good time for those freedom loving users of computers and the Internet to make the move to Linux and Open Source. I guarantee you that the cowardly heads of Microsoft and Apple and computer hardware manufacturers will grovel at the feet of fucking Trump and throw money at him just like the heads of Facebook and Amazon did earlier.

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
30. Your Response Is Well Informed And Dead On Point
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 10:08 AM
5 hrs ago

They'll make it a criminal offense to utilize any device circumventing the technology.

I guarantee it.

Prison profits are up, but the investors are eager to profit even more.

angrychair

(12,352 posts)
32. I agree with everything you said...
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 10:24 AM
4 hrs ago

Except I just don't think manufacturing will comply and stop making IOT type devices, from TVs to refrigerators, will just stop being internet capable or have things like the Google TV OS on it.

Ultimately, this will die. The alternative is a murder/suicide of the tech industry and the Internet and we are a tech driven world.

At least that is my hope.

angrychair

(12,352 posts)
31. This isn't practical either
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 10:17 AM
4 hrs ago

I'm an currently working IT professional with over 30 years of experience and I can tell you this law would be technically impossible to implement it at the scale it implies and even just implementing it on Internet connected devices would be so incredibly expensive manufacturers of IOT devices, from TVs to Refrigerators, that they would just stop making them.

If I'm being honest, I think that is their goal: to isolate people and control information people see and hear.
If you cannot access the Internet, then your only source of information is mainstream media which is now entirely controlled by Republicans.

dickthegrouch

(4,566 posts)
35. I'm also an operating system (and networking, and application) expert of 40+ years
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 11:24 AM
3 hrs ago

The staggering scale of this is almost impossible to visualize in this day and age of Kubernetes containers, use-based instantly created operating environments which then disappear again after use, and applications which actually process all your data remotely, almost without your knowledge.

I expect Microsoft, Apple, Google and many others to send this piece of garbage to the trash bin in their comments and lobbying as soon as possible.

dickthegrouch

(4,566 posts)
34. Unconstitutional on its face
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 11:07 AM
4 hrs ago

In the government’s own explanation of the first Amendment:

For example, because association supports other First Amendment activity, the Court has recognized that compelling disclosure of one’s associations can inhibit exercising protected First Amendment rights, particularly where disclosure would subject an individual to threats, harassment, or economic reprisals.18 Accordingly, First Amendment protections are triggered not only by actual restrictions on an individual’s ability to join with others to further shared goals, but also by laws or regulations that may have a chilling effect on association.19

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt1-8-1/ALDE_00013139/

Johonny

(26,327 posts)
36. This feels a lot like Al Gore and music labeling
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 12:44 PM
2 hrs ago

An issue that united Liberals and Conservatives against it and ultimately bombed with the public.

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
38. We're Not Gonna' Take It!
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 01:09 PM
2 hrs ago

This is Orwellian surveillance in the extreme.

This is as bad or worse than FLOCK because the surveillance is always with you and always logging your activity without any chance of privacy.

EdmondDantes_

(1,947 posts)
40. Ugh. While there are ways that would minimize privacy concerns
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 01:29 PM
1 hr ago

I don't trust that those will be used. You could create an anonymous token that only stores a true/false value for over 18 or not, or whatever if they want like 18+, 16-18, below 16, etc.

Yes you need the id for the initial validation, but that could be deleted and never stored.

MayReasonRule

(4,126 posts)
41. The Entire Point Is To Surveil Every Fucking Interaction That Anyone Has With Anything
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 02:34 PM
35 min ago

Everything, Everywhere, All At Once

They've been shooting for this since they installed the IP siphon tools at the main switches world wide under FISA.

This is magnitudes of order worse.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New US Congress bill prop...