General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy Opinion on Government-Religious Controversy
This might be controversial, but I feel myself compelled by my beliefs and my education to say it. If the government wants religious leaders to stay silent on politics, then politicians must leave religion out of politics. I was taught in church that Jesus said render unto Ceaser what is Ceaser's, and render unto God, what is God's. Not to mention the founders of the U.S. plainly wrote in the very 1st ammendment that the government was forbidden to establish a state religion. Through out history there is many examples of why mixing church and state is a horrendous and dangerous idea.
I love my faith and my country, but 💯 believe in the separation of church and state.
get the red out
(14,039 posts)There will only be one ruling Church, I have always been amazed at how many people of faith (unlike yourself) don't realize that their right to worship as they believe is protected by it.
BlueKota
(5,425 posts)about a very similar thing. He was against allowing the government to fund religious organizations because he said inevitably the government would want to take control over how those organizations were run.
odins folly
(613 posts)But why is it that the pope should stay out of politics and yet right wing televangelist hustlers get to inject themselves into politics and we should believe them.??
Of for that matter, political hustlers spouting nonsensical religious themed rhetoric should be believed????
BlueKota
(5,425 posts)surfered
(13,724 posts)They lived closer to the time of the Reformation when Catholics and Protestants took turns persecuting and killing each other depending on the religion favored by the King or Queen at the time of their reign.
BlueKota
(5,425 posts)about the lessons of history, and even some of those that do deliberately ignore them.
lindysalsagal
(22,965 posts)brought religion into the framework. They were right, of course. How many small towns have 4 Baptist churches? 3 Synagogues? Evangelicals, LDS, JW's? Even catholics find ways to splinter. Buddhists, as well.
BlueKota
(5,425 posts)Also look what chaos religious differences cause in the Middle East and caused in Ireland.
Blue Full Moon
(3,535 posts)After the christofascists sent political advocates to churches in the 70s? To preach Republican hypocrisy. Because you know Reagan was a man of God and Jimmy Carter was Satan. Republicans are the Mouth piece of the Antichrist.
BlueKota
(5,425 posts)Their patriotism is as phony as their "christianity."
Soul_of_Wit
(112 posts)That is precisely why they wanted that to be impossible in the US. The founders were a mix of hardcore religious types and the areligious (the Deists.) The body of the Constitution bans religious tests for office. The First Amendment both prevents a state religion and guarantees the right to practice any (or no) religion. Too many see the "right to practice" as the right to discriminate against those who do not share the same religion. The Constitution is crystal clear that the US should never be a theocracy.
BlueKota
(5,425 posts)so they could practice their religion freely but also welcomed Protestants. Letting everyone choose to practice whatever religion they choose, as well as not trying to force people who don't believe, to believe, is a major part of the beauty of the U.S., or it was until we let a bunch of ideologues take over our media and our government.
Norrrm
(5,223 posts)
yardwork
(69,458 posts)That is the "separation of church and state." It means that Congress can't establish a state religion, and Congress can't prevent anyone in the U.S. from worshiping as they choose.
In other words it is a constitutionally protected right in the U.S. to be Christian, Muslim, Hindi, Jewish, pagan, Wiccan or whatever you choose, and nobody can make that illegal.
At the same time, the government can't say that any religion is the official state religion.