Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,448 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 12:36 PM 13 hrs ago

So, the answer is 'yes'

Aaron Rupar @atrupar 1h
WARREN: That's not my question. Are you refusing to tell us if you have investments in vehicles set up by Jeffrey Epstein?

KEVIN WARSH: Those assets will be sold if I'm confirmed





____At his confirmation hearing before the Senate Banking Committee, Senator Elizabeth Warren asked Warsh about more than $100 million in investments that he has “refused to disclose to ethics officials and the public,” specifically assets held in vehicles called “THSDFS LLC” and the “Juggernaut Fund.” Warren directly asked the Fed chair nominee whether any of his assets had to do with President Trump or his family, the Chinese government, money laundering, or Jeffrey Epstein.

“Are you refusing to tell us if you have investments, for example, in vehicles set up to advance Jeffrey Epstein? Is that what you’re telling us—you just won’t tell us?” Warren asked.

Warren then asked if he would “at least disclose how you would plan to disclose and divest these secret assets,” citing a scenario in which a billionaire looking for inside information from the Fed would cut him a check for $100 million. Warsh still would not answer the question, instead saying that he had come to an agreement with the Office of Government Ethics to divest his assets.

Warsh’s name has popped up a couple of times in the government’s Epstein files. While that doesn’t implicate him in any of Epstein’s crimes, it does show that they traveled in the same circles. Warsh, who would become the wealthiest Fed chair in more than 100 years if confirmed, is married to billionaire heiress Jane Lauder, granddaughter of Estée Lauder and daughter of Republican donor Ronald Lauder. Is Warsh being evasive because he’s trying to dismiss those connections, or is it because he actually has assets connected to the notorious criminal?

read https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-fed-chair-pick-dodges-155142986.html


Former Federal Reserve Board Governor (2006-2011) and Trump's nominee for Federal Reserve Chair in January 2026. Son-in-law of Estee Lauder heir Ronald Lauder. Warsh and his wife Jane Lauder appear on a guest list labeled 'St. Barth's Christmas 2010' that was forwarded to Epstein via email, with a note 'House near Isle de France.' The list contained 43 names including Roman Abramovich and Brett Ratner.

The timing of the revelation was notable -- Trump nominated Warsh as Fed Chair on January 30, 2026, and hours later the DOJ released millions of pages including this document... also named on the DOJ's February 2026 list of 305 politically exposed persons.

https://epsteinexposed.com/persons/kevin-warsh


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LymphocyteLover

(9,966 posts)
1. It's fucking insane and gross. Also I recommend the Bluesky version
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 01:54 PM
12 hrs ago

WARREN: That's not my question. Are you refusing to tell us if you have investments in vehicles set up by Jeffrey Epstein?

KEVIN WARSH: Those assets will be sold if I'm confirmed

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-04-21T14:47:47.274Z

FakeNoose

(41,977 posts)
2. Shady as all get-out, and Warsh is in the Epstein files
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 02:05 PM
12 hrs ago

"The Dis-Honorable Kevin Warsh" is more like it.

H2O Man

(79,136 posts)
3. Recommended.
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 02:07 PM
12 hrs ago

I had two phone calls yesterday evening from an old friend, a retired university professor who recently returned to the east coast. The first time, when he called, he cut it short, saying he was too disturbed to have a civil conversation, by the amount of coruption in this administration. I waited 90 minutes or so, and called him back. That, too, was a brief conversation, as he was angry that our country is at a point where a sociopath & fiends are getting away with this shit. I do not think he is the only one of our generation dealing with this.

maxsolomon

(38,929 posts)
5. SOP for Repukes in Senate Confirmation hearings.
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 02:16 PM
12 hrs ago

Stonewall. Non-answer answers. Non-denial denials.

He'll sail right through.

Martin68

(27,942 posts)
6. Epstein may have done us a favor. Every corrupt official and billionaire in the world is on his "list."
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 02:24 PM
12 hrs ago

johnnyplankton

(646 posts)
10. After the confirmations of the nitwits that Republicans approved for cabinet positions, I'm pretty sure they'll confirm
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 02:53 PM
11 hrs ago

They'd confirm Trump favorite Hannibal Lecter if he told them to.

MerryBlooms

(12,336 posts)
12. r&k sleezeball. My dad was an uneducated man from the very early days, down in Clyde TX
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 03:08 PM
11 hrs ago

Until the day he died, he would tell me, "I warshed clothes today", when we had our weekly chats. Lol, Warsh to me still sounds like something you soap up and rinse down the drain, because it's dirty. Warsh, is dirty as a 2 week load a laundry!

sop

(18,909 posts)
14. Interesting article at TPM: 'Warsh Hearing Reveals How Tightly Trump Has Tied Himself in a Knot on Fed Control'
Tue Apr 21, 2026, 03:34 PM
10 hrs ago

Some excerpts:

"As it stands, Warsh seemingly has no chance of confirmation, as senators of both parties object to a bogus Justice Department investigation into current Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the cost of Federal Reserve building renovations that appears to be ongoing. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) has vowed to oppose the nomination until the investigation ends. Trump has only doubled down on continuing the investigation, which a federal judge repeatedly suggested has no merit. Trump’s words have also tied the president in a knot, as he’s repeatedly and publicly said he expects Warsh to cut rates, and even confirmed he told Warsh this in a meeting. The revelation directly contradicts Warsh’s own statements about Fed independence and his meeting with the president."

"In his opening remarks and throughout the proceedings, Warsh emphasized his belief in Fed independence for monetary policy setting."

"Asked directly by Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) whether he’d commit to being independent from Trump, Warsh said 'Yes, senator, I do.' He later, however, seemed to qualify that assertion, raising new questions about exactly what Fed 'independence' means to him."

“ 'Independence has to be earned and it’s earned by delivering on the promises, the commitment that the Fed has made,' Warsh said in response to Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD). Rounds called Federal Reserve independence 'critical.' "

"On Tuesday morning, Trump in an interview on CNBC’s Squawkbox said he would be disappointed if his new Fed chair didn’t cut rates 'right away.' In December, the president posted on Truth Social that the economy was doing well, and that his new fed chair should lower rates."

“ 'Anybody that disagrees with me will never be the Fed Chairman!' Trump wrote on the post."

"Also in December, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump 'pressed Warsh on whether he could trust him to support interest-rate cuts,' and that Trump 'confirmed that reporting.' "

"Warsh on Thursday repeatedly held that Trump had never asked him to cut interest rates, and that Warsh would never agree to those terms."

“ 'Someone here is lying, then,' said Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), referencing the Journal reporting. 'Who’s lying here? Is it you or the president? Because the president confirmed that he did ask you to cut interest rates.' "

"Warsh has flip-flopped on his policy stance. In the past, he was known for wanting to keep rates high to avoid price inflation. In recent months, he’s pivoted to a stance calling for lower rates. His defenders call the 180 a change of mind. Senators worried it was something more sinister."

“ 'I am concerned that your position on interest rates seems to shift with what’s politically convenient, rather than based on sound economic judgment,' said Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD)."

“ 'Can you tell us a little bit,' prodded Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), 'about your conversations with President Trump about interest rates?' "

“ 'The problem is that President Trump has said he’s not going to appoint anybody who wouldn’t agree to lower interest rights,' said Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA). 'Have you agreed with the president that you’re going to lower interest rates?' "

"Tillis appeared to try and offer Trump an off-ramp during his comments. With posterboards explaining construction and renovation costs, Tillis used his time to rail against the investigation into Powell and reiterated his belief that the cost of Fed building renovations are justified. But rather than mount an antagonistic offense against Trump, Tillis pinned the unpopular investigation on nameless DOJ officials. Trump in January denied he had knowledge of the Powell investigation beforehand."

“ 'The problem that I have here is that we had some U.S. attorney with a dream or assistant U.S. attorney thinking it would be cute to bring chair Powell under an investigation just a few months before the position was going to be open,' Tillis said. 'We have got to end this investigation,' Tillis said later. 'Big DOJ didn’t know about it. The president didn’t know about it. Let’s get rid of this investigation so I can support your confirmation.' "

"Tillis’ characterization, however, contradicts Trump’s own. On the Tuesday morning CNBC interview, the president refused to consider dropping the case...'We have to find out why a small building costs close to $4 billion,' Trump said."

"Warsh cannot be confirmed without Tillis’ support."

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/warsh-federal-reserve-chair-hearing-reveals-how-tightly-trump-has-tied-himself-in-a-knot

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, the answer is 'yes'