General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSPLC Indicted - so now it's official
This administration is literally the Klan.
Buckle up.
pwb
(12,728 posts).
orangecrush
(30,691 posts)Masks are the new hoods.
Lovie777
(23,253 posts)Klarkashton
(5,355 posts)This comes as no surprise.
lostincalifornia
(5,434 posts)These are the worst of the worst.
B.See
(8,608 posts)kimbutgar
(27,372 posts)Pinback
(13,616 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,708 posts)orangecrush
(30,691 posts)yobrault1
(206 posts)MONTGOMERY, Ala. - The Southern Poverty Law Center faces federal fraud and money laundering charges after investigators alleged the group secretly funded the same extremist organizations it claimed to oppose.
What we know:
A Montgomery grand jury returned an 11-count indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) for wire fraud, conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering, and making false statements to a bank.
Federal officials say that between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC secretly sent more than $3 million to people associated with violent extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the National Socialist Movement, and the American Nazi Party.
The indictment alleges the SPLC used bank accounts tied to fictitious entities to hide the source and control of the money.
What they're saying:
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the SPLC is "manufacturing racism to justify its existence."
FBI Director Kash Patel added that the organization allegedly lied to donors while paying leaders of extremist groups to facilitate crimes.
Acting United States Attorney Kevin Davidson noted that donors believed they were supporting a fight against extremism, but their money was instead diverted to benefit groups the SPLC publicly denounced.
The Source: Information in this article comes from a release by the United States Department of Justice
mountain grammy
(29,092 posts)Manufacturing racism! My god! These people! Garbage people. This is sickening.
calimary
(90,352 posts)then I have a moral and civic duty to push back, AGAINST their efforts.
bsiebs
(972 posts)BaronChocula
(4,643 posts)On what grounds is a judge is going to buy the illegality of infiltrating hate groups???
paleotn
(22,450 posts)To prove wire fraud, you have to show that the defendant had intent to defraud. Thats hard to do even when youre talking about an individual person. To establish that an entire corporate entity had intent to defraud seems exceptionally difficult, he said. Same goes for bank fraud. Difficult crime to prove because you have to prove what is going on inside someones head at the moment they are conducting the financial transactions. Easier to do with an individual because you can get the context from other witnesses and sometimes emails or texts.
I dont think they can prove their case at trial, he added.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/21/doj-southern-poverty-law-center-investigation