General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama re: Supreme Court Ruling on Voting Rights
[Reported by Lauren Gambino, The Guardian 15.13 EDT]
'Obama says supreme court ruling frees states to 'systematically weaken voting power of racial minorities'
Former president Barack Obama has issued this statement in reaction to the supreme courts landmark decision today to effectively gut a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act.
'He said the ruling frees state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of partisanship rather than explicit racial bias.
'And it serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach.
'The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers - not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.'
Lovie777
(23,389 posts)-misanthroptimist
(1,729 posts)...that gerrymandering on the basis of partisanship is identical to doing it on the basis of race, given that 90%+ of AAs vote Democratic.
dpibel
(4,001 posts)And that is the extra added in your face juice that this supreme court loves so well.
walkingman
(11,071 posts)But with the technology of today and party affiliation being public record in many states it truly in many cases become the politicians picking their voters, instead of voters picking their politicians.
I wish we would go to some sort of proportional voting. Where the party that gets, for example, 30 percent of the votes gets roughly 30 percent of the seats in the legislature. I think this would be very good at the State level and at the Federal level eliminate the "winner take all" system
pat_k
(13,623 posts)Seems they hit the ideal features that benefit Republican white supremacists.
Or perhaps I'm missing something?
MadameButterfly
(4,124 posts)The purpose then of gerrymandering is to keep whoever is in power and make it impossible for the opposition to win. It ends democracy whether or not it affects a particular race. It seems SCOTUS forgot about the constitution.
pat_k
(13,623 posts)Actually, it had already been burned by five SCOTUS traitors (Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas) with the Bush v. Gore decision.
None Dare Call It Treason
Five Supreme Court Justices are criminals in the truest sense of the word.
Vincent Bugliosi
February 5, 2001
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/none-dare-call-it-treason/
Dave Bowman
(7,337 posts)
angrychair
(12,409 posts)How is creating a majority white district perfectly fine but a majority Black district is not?
pat_k
(13,623 posts)Or perhaps I'm missing something?
Cirsium
(4,023 posts)White people get to have things. End of story. Why? Because.
malaise
(297,317 posts)All of them must condemn this madness
orleans
(37,108 posts)maybe it's my low mood reacting to this but when i read
'The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers - not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.'
i had one thought:
they won't