Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan Hawaiʻi Deliver All Of America From Citizens United?
But what if the states took the the initiative to limit the impact of Citizens United by passing their own laws to change the way corporations are defined?
That is the purpose of Senate Bill 2471, which would emphasize that corporations are artificial persons created by state law and granted powers and privileges by it something SB 2471 points out is already part of Hawaiʻis constitution.
The bill would make clear that the powers of corporations do not include spending money or contributing anything of value to influence elections or ballot measures, as the bills language explains.
That could directly challenge the ability of super PACs to raise unlimited money and keep their sources of funding secret.
That is the purpose of Senate Bill 2471, which would emphasize that corporations are artificial persons created by state law and granted powers and privileges by it something SB 2471 points out is already part of Hawaiʻis constitution.
The bill would make clear that the powers of corporations do not include spending money or contributing anything of value to influence elections or ballot measures, as the bills language explains.
That could directly challenge the ability of super PACs to raise unlimited money and keep their sources of funding secret.
https://www.civilbeat.org/2026/04/can-hawaii-deliver-all-of-america-from-citizens-united/
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can Hawaiʻi Deliver All Of America From Citizens United? (Original Post)
pnwmom
2 hrs ago
OP
Won't the 6 Partisan Hacks in Robes just declare their laws unconstitutional?
Chasstev365
29 min ago
#7
bucolic_frolic
(55,547 posts)1. Anyone with an inside on it should go for it.
The status quo is not working for people.
Cha
(319,972 posts)2. Mahao and Good Luck , Hawaii.. from your link..
The bill has cleared the Senate unanimously and one House committee. David Tarnas, chair of the House Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs Committee, said he will decide soon whether to hear it as well the last committee necessary for the bill to advance to likely conference committee
TY pnwmom
MadameButterfly
(4,124 posts)3. Isn't Montana also doing something to challenge Citizens United?
Fiendish Thingy
(23,684 posts)4. Yes they are. Nt
RainCaster
(13,818 posts)5. About furking time
So glad to see states are stepping in where our Congress is refusing to.
Ferryboat
(1,267 posts)6. If it is held up by the courts, expect to see the same in Washington state.
Chasstev365
(8,001 posts)7. Won't the 6 Partisan Hacks in Robes just declare their laws unconstitutional?
DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,515 posts)8. Probably
If it even gets that far. It should be noted, the Hawaii Attorney General's office opposes the bill, as they do not think its Constitutional either.
From the article-
Whether it passes legal muster remains to be seen. The Attorney Generals Office opposes SB 2471.
Deputy Attorney General Christopher Han told lawmakers that, while the department greatly sympathizes with the frustration with federal case law on this subject, the bill raises serious constitutional concerns and substantial adverse litigation risk should it become law.
While many Americans strongly disagree with the U.S. Supreme Courts holding in Citizens United, under our federal system of government, it is our duty to state that this opinion remains the law of the land, irrespective of its merits (or lack thereof), he said in written testimony last month.
Han reaffirmed that argument when he spoke to the House Consumer Protection and Commerce Committee on March 18. He said SB 2471 relied on an untested legal theory, the viability of which we find questionable.
Deputy Attorney General Christopher Han told lawmakers that, while the department greatly sympathizes with the frustration with federal case law on this subject, the bill raises serious constitutional concerns and substantial adverse litigation risk should it become law.
While many Americans strongly disagree with the U.S. Supreme Courts holding in Citizens United, under our federal system of government, it is our duty to state that this opinion remains the law of the land, irrespective of its merits (or lack thereof), he said in written testimony last month.
Han reaffirmed that argument when he spoke to the House Consumer Protection and Commerce Committee on March 18. He said SB 2471 relied on an untested legal theory, the viability of which we find questionable.