Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
Sun May 31, 2026, 11:40 AM Yesterday

Re Platner - We can bask in our purity


As we sit in places like Delaney Hall, after they round us up.

Don't mind the maggots in the food, they are little badges of honor

214 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Re Platner - We can bask in our purity (Original Post) orangecrush Yesterday OP
Replay of Rep. Anthony Weiner. no_hypocrisy Yesterday #1
Weiner actually got some prison time LisaL Yesterday #17
Weiner went to jail for sexting a 15 year old EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #20
Anthony Weiner sent dick pictures while he was IN congress. He was caught, and did it again. And was caught again. Fil1957 Yesterday #21
Not to mention when he did it again, he HURT HRC's 2016 Campaign karynnj Yesterday #29
As far as I can tell, people who do it, usually can't stop. LisaL Yesterday #33
It really cost him everything he most cared about karynnj Yesterday #37
Oh yeah, forgot that he might have cost HRC the election. Fil1957 Yesterday #39
I could never forget that one. LisaL Yesterday #40
Weiner clearly had some mental issues. Fil1957 Yesterday #98
We are now to the point where we are DEFENDING Anthony Weiner and his actions ? stopdiggin Yesterday #44
As far as I can see the only disqualifier sarisataka Yesterday #148
When our measuring stick becomes Trump, everything is permitted. Lancero 8 min ago #211
Totally different situation. ShazzieB Yesterday #46
Weiner and his pedophilia might've cost us the 2016 election mr715 Yesterday #58
This is not the way Boo1 Yesterday #161
The oligarchs love to tell the peasants: "Suffering builds character" dalton99a Yesterday #2
Look at their standard bearer orangecrush Yesterday #3
The comparison will be Platner vs Collins karynnj Yesterday #32
Actually Platner's behaviors remind me of Trump. delisen Yesterday #53
Are they? Boo1 22 hrs ago #164
All I care about is winning elections and keeping as many filthy MAGATs out of office as possible. BannonsLiver Yesterday #4
We dumped Al Franklin for what? Ferryboat Yesterday #5
We did not "dump" Al Franken. He resigned, conceded the successful campaign question everything Yesterday #9
Franken was pushed out by his fellow colleagues, he was targeted because he was too effective questionseverything Yesterday #11
To save the ACA, PERIOD END OF krawhitham Yesterday #13
We gained an outstanding senator in that seat. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #16
I don't think we gained anything from that situation. LisaL Yesterday #18
As a Minnesotan, I believe Tina Smith was a better senator than Franken, and a case could be made for Franken's WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #24
Well, that situation with Roy Moore LisaL Yesterday #28
It also saved the ACA krawhitham 7 hrs ago #188
lol BannonsLiver Yesterday #22
Being unwilling to keep a serial groper in office is a good thing EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #30
Al Franken made a moral decision mr715 Yesterday #59
Ethics and morals had nothing to do with it. DFW 5 hrs ago #192
He isn't my friend. mr715 3 hrs ago #193
Thank you for keeping Brooklynite's commitment to not-so-humble brags alive and well on this forum after his departure. BannonsLiver 24 min ago #208
I'll tell you what Quiet Em Yesterday #6
Thanks for the go ahead on this. I'll concentrate on all of them. All in here -- everywhere. KPN Yesterday #8
Fine but stop swinging your hammer at our basket please questionseverything Yesterday #12
Oyah, if we losing Maine, we are definitely winning Ohio. mr715 Yesterday #60
We can bask in our purity or rise up and kick Trump's fat ass. Those are our choices. flashman13 Yesterday #7
We can also bask in our stupidity. Irish_Dem Yesterday #10
Yep. We are doing it really well. LisaL Yesterday #14
I don't think Democrats are stupid. orangecrush Yesterday #64
That's what is so frustrating. Irish_Dem Yesterday #68
yes Skittles Yesterday #99
Skittles from the lectures I am receiving today, integrity is a quaint old fashioned notion. Irish_Dem Yesterday #107
yup, I am a vet, grew up in a military family Skittles Yesterday #121
Now we see how self-defeating all the purity attacks on a Nixie Yesterday #15
Yes. And it's interesting that many of the people mcar Yesterday #56
Exactly! As if we wouldn't notice the switcheroo and amnesia Nixie Yesterday #156
Yeah, I noticed. Cha 20 hrs ago #169
*poof* all the dramatic vote-my-conscience moral purity turns into pragmatism, big tent, think of the majority. betsuni 13 hrs ago #181
Clicks duckworth969 Yesterday #19
When I saw the headlines orangecrush Yesterday #69
So sh*tty behavior now becomes "nothing to see here". 'Cause - 'purity' stopdiggin Yesterday #23
Hardly Red Mountain Yesterday #26
Personally think that the latest round of 'concern' is primarily click bait media stuff stopdiggin Yesterday #67
Totally admit it Red Mountain Yesterday #129
and, in turn - I will not be arguing at all that there isn't occasion when it is appropriate (perhaps imperative?) stopdiggin 22 hrs ago #163
Fair enough Red Mountain 8 hrs ago #184
Accusing Democrats of being bought and paid for ('corporate Dems') is the worst purity test and not true. betsuni Yesterday #25
THANK YOU!! Cha 19 hrs ago #170
As a woman, Platner creeps me out jmbar2 Yesterday #27
That's how I feel. LisaL Yesterday #31
This opposition research comes from Collins main supporter, AIPAC questionseverything Yesterday #36
But do you really think it's all there is? LisaL Yesterday #38
Yes, where are the women? MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #62
Probably going to vote for Graham Platner. mr715 Yesterday #106
Same go for Bill Clinton? orangecrush Yesterday #76
He was a sleaze, but had a track record and a weak opponent. jmbar2 Yesterday #92
thank you for framing this with such clarity and perspective. needed to be said! - - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin Yesterday #88
Agreed pinkstarburst Yesterday #130
Anyone concerned about a candidates personal life over their ability to push the party agenda... TheSphinx Yesterday #34
Republicans clearly aren't concerned. LisaL Yesterday #35
Americans as a whole arent concerned either.. TheSphinx Yesterday #45
Yea, well, how is it working out? LisaL Yesterday #52
Trump couldnt care less. But guess what? He WON TheSphinx Yesterday #77
Yes, I am sure Trump is happy he won. LisaL Yesterday #82
The goal of the election is to win the election. mr715 Yesterday #101
I don't vote for candidates in the general election because I like them, I vote for candidates who will push the sop Yesterday #54
there's "personal life" and then there is a misogynistic creep with a nazi tattoo Skittles Yesterday #65
I really hate this attitude. Trump is not "winning" - TBF Yesterday #72
Tom Massie said he's going to identify more individuals whose names were redacted from the Piggy/Epstein files MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #120
I'm sorry but, you cant take down an enemy if you are unwilling to match or exceed their energy TheSphinx Yesterday #131
That is absolutely not what I said, but nice try Ace TBF Yesterday #132
Yea and the Epstein files are almost completely out of the news cycle right now.. TheSphinx Yesterday #136
"the news cycle" is owned by Trump's billionaire friends TBF Yesterday #138
Welcome to DU sarisataka Yesterday #87
lol TBF Yesterday #133
Considering no one has said what the texts say or who they were actually sent to -- and Im sure Nanjeanne Yesterday #41
Give it time. LisaL Yesterday #42
AIPAC has unleashed millions to defeat platner questionseverything Yesterday #48
Or we could develop better red flag detectors, because they were jumping out at me several months ago. FascismIsDeath Yesterday #43
I don't have a vote in Maine snd not telling those that do how to vote. surfered Yesterday #47
And he is only been married for 3 years, for crying out loud. LisaL Yesterday #51
surely there is some common ground between creep-with-nazi-tattoo and the perfect candidate Skittles Yesterday #49
lol Renew Deal Yesterday #50
For sure, let men be sexual deviants. Boys will be boys. Irish_Dem Yesterday #55
non sequitur orangecrush Yesterday #89
So married men sexting strangers is the same as just having an affair? Irish_Dem Yesterday #100
Strangers? orangecrush Yesterday #105
He was on KIK, online site for teens and tweens. Irish_Dem Yesterday #111
So he was sexting minors? orangecrush Yesterday #119
He used KIK. LisaL 19 hrs ago #171
Please don't quote right wing sources here orangecrush 19 hrs ago #172
You asked for a source. I got you a source. LisaL 19 hrs ago #173
It is against DU terms of service orangecrush 19 hrs ago #174
Here. I am not sure what qualifies as not a right wing source, LisaL 19 hrs ago #175
Some people really want to stick their heads in the ground even when everything is on the line. Exultant Democracy 7 hrs ago #187
Mills dropped out of the race. Unless Emile 5 hrs ago #191
Yes hence the stupid money already pissed away the best chance, but David Costello is a fine backup Exultant Democracy 2 hrs ago #204
"I admire your optimism. It's completely unfounded, but I admire it." Emile 2 hrs ago #205
Exceptions are permitted if you provide a clear reason for doing so that is consistent with the values of this website. Exultant Democracy 19 hrs ago #176
This message was self-deleted by its author orangecrush 19 hrs ago #177
Quoting a right wing think tank to attack a Democratic candidate orangecrush 9 hrs ago #183
Its okay -- purity test for thee not for me. mr715 3 hrs ago #194
Nothing says "class" or "dignity" like a headless mirror selfie MorbidButterflyTat 2 hrs ago #203
But he is wearing a towel. LisaL 10 min ago #209
Post removed Post removed Yesterday #117
And I wonder how much AIPAC oppo research paid that aide orangecrush Yesterday #109
Enough to hoodwink stalwart Democrats on DU mr715 3 hrs ago #195
Being a rape apologist does. niyad 20 hrs ago #167
Message auto-removed Name removed Yesterday #57
Yup orangecrush Yesterday #84
She is concerned that all her support comes from a Democratic message board. mr715 Yesterday #97
Did he have an affair RandySF Yesterday #61
Yeah, how does a guy just start sexting random women? MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #75
It happens every day in the country RandySF Yesterday #83
Well, first a man and woman say they like each other... mr715 Yesterday #96
So he had affairs with all these women? MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #123
His wife seems to love him. mr715 Yesterday #125
I wouldn't bet the farm on that. TBF Yesterday #140
Open relationships are a thing. mr715 Yesterday #142
It's Maine, not my state so I'll let the voters decide - TBF Yesterday #144
I don't want to reduce anyone's agency. mr715 Yesterday #146
I pray she is not in an abusive relationship - whether mental or physical TBF Yesterday #152
What if they are only open on one side? LisaL Yesterday #145
Yup it is. mr715 Yesterday #147
Yep, and it's called cheating, as far as I can tell. LisaL Yesterday #149
Yep! mr715 Yesterday #150
Like I said, I am glad I don't have to vote for him. LisaL Yesterday #151
My hunch is that ALL of their shared assets are wrapped up in his campaign jmbar2 Yesterday #154
I wouldn't be surprised - TBF Yesterday #155
Oh please MorbidButterflyTat 22 hrs ago #165
How many in this thread even vote in that state? MineralMan Yesterday #63
He is running for Senate so this affects all of us. LisaL Yesterday #66
And yet, you do not vote there. MineralMan Yesterday #71
Why do we focus on any elections? LisaL Yesterday #73
I can tell you why I focus on elections in Minnesota. MineralMan Yesterday #93
You have a particularly interesting governor to elect. mr715 20 hrs ago #168
Post removed Post removed Yesterday #103
And the primary in Texas (et.al.) was not of national significance? I think stopdiggin Yesterday #113
this is a POLITICAL BOARD Skittles Yesterday #70
Exactly. LisaL Yesterday #74
This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles Yesterday #80
You know what is POLITICAL? MineralMan Yesterday #78
LOL Skittles Yesterday #79
I'm pretty sure you and I Ishoutandscream2 Yesterday #116
Lol Lifeafter70 29 min ago #206
If you are only concered about your own state, why use a discussion board LisaL Yesterday #85
Oh, dear! Well, you see, there are also national Politics. MineralMan Yesterday #95
That's who he is Ishoutandscream2 Yesterday #104
Yep Lifeafter70 25 min ago #207
This is a different Democratic Party sarisataka Yesterday #81
That about sums it up. LisaL Yesterday #86
... orangecrush Yesterday #91
Did Bill Clinton recount his homophobic jokes sarisataka Yesterday #112
sounds a bit like a, "but Mussolini made the trains run on time .. " type of argument stopdiggin Yesterday #118
Don't forget Blackwater merc and to me, questionable finances EX500rider Yesterday #126
100% Blue Full Moon Yesterday #90
They will. orangecrush Yesterday #94
AIPAC buying an election again. Blue Full Moon Yesterday #110
Spot on. orangecrush Yesterday #115
This is up to the voters in Maine. ShazzieB Yesterday #102
Thread winner orangecrush Yesterday #114
"Platner's "baggage" has been blown way out of proportion" EX500rider Yesterday #127
It wasn't an "SS" tattoo. ShazzieB Yesterday #139
This guy is 41 years old. LisaL Yesterday #143
Yeah, no, it was (and he does not deny it) a SS Totenkopf, no doubt about that EX500rider Yesterday #157
Yes, he found out what it was because people recognized it and told him. ShazzieB 23 hrs ago #162
The tattoo really pesters me LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #159
No, not "a long time ago." TommyT139 18 hrs ago #178
I don't live there so i dont have a vote or voice there Samael13 Yesterday #108
People talk like they are voting for the person, or not. The reality of how Congress works RockRaven Yesterday #122
This. mr715 Yesterday #128
OK, I will explain w/an example. MAGATS embrace the party - TBF Yesterday #135
or, conversely - do we now endorse the notion that our star football player stopdiggin Yesterday #124
I will let Mainers worry about him. I ain't donating to him. LymphocyteLover Yesterday #134
I know the woman who brought up the sexting. She did GPV Yesterday #137
So far I am impressed by McDonald, if that is who you are referring to. delisen Yesterday #141
Whatever happened to vote blue no matter who Bluestocking Yesterday #153
Good question. I would vote for Costello, other dem in the race. delisen Yesterday #158
This or that gibraltar72 Yesterday #160
Support democrats DoBW 22 hrs ago #166
Thanks orangecrush 14 hrs ago #180
Many of Platner's earliest and most fervent supporters are ones that started this purity bullshit. W_HAMILTON 17 hrs ago #179
The original recipe purity test of Medicare for All or you're a corrupt corporate shill who hates universal health care betsuni 12 hrs ago #182
"We can bask in our purity As we sit in places like Delaney Hall, after they round us up." WhiskeyGrinder 8 hrs ago #185
I get Linda Tripp vibes re Genevieve McDonald. Do I give a shit about "sexting"? Not one bit as long as Nanjeanne 7 hrs ago #186
Marmishness mr715 3 hrs ago #196
For the record, Genevieve McDonald didn't leak this to rightwingers Quiet Em 2 hrs ago #197
For the record there isn't much on the record. No actual texts have been seen so we have zero info Nanjeanne 2 hrs ago #198
I have no idea what the WSJ has or doesn't have Quiet Em 2 hrs ago #200
No one does. But doesn't stop all the speculation and conjecture. Nanjeanne 2 hrs ago #201
Would you say the same thing if it was a GOP'er with an SS tattoo?? WarGamer 6 hrs ago #189
Looks like the GOP better worry about losing the Senate orangecrush 5 hrs ago #190
Nazi tats, has treated women badly and talked about them worse, and was a RW mercenary obamanut2012 2 hrs ago #199
Thanks for posting orangecrush 2 hrs ago #202
Platner getting the Al Franken treatment from the RW trolls we have on DU. Kingofalldems 8 min ago #210
If I was in Maine I would vote for Mills, I do not trust Platner obamanut2012 6 min ago #212
I don't trust him either. LisaL 2 min ago #213
Did not say you were--just a recognizable few. Kingofalldems 10 sec ago #214

no_hypocrisy

(55,521 posts)
1. Replay of Rep. Anthony Weiner.
Sun May 31, 2026, 11:48 AM
Yesterday

Dems abandoned him despite Weiner being a firebrand on the floor of the House.

He could have shown current Dems how it’s done.

He lost his seat. He lost his wife. Perpetually monikered with “disgraced”.

And did his resignation materially help the Party or just sustain the status quote?

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
17. Weiner actually got some prison time
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:46 PM
Yesterday

because the girl was underaged. I guess you don't realize that, or what? I don't think he could have served from prison, by the way.
It would be kind of difficult to vote, no?

EdmondDantes_

(2,146 posts)
20. Weiner went to jail for sexting a 15 year old
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:49 PM
Yesterday

Under no circumstances should we stand by that. Platner's texts going to adult women is entirely different (provided it was with consent). People can make arguments about his tattoo and his reddit posts being disqualifying for them. I'm very glad I don't live in Maine where I think either likely choice is deeply problematic.

But when you have to downplay someone's actions or relying on whataboutism it's not a convincing argument. It's not as simple as we are inherently good because we have picked the right party. My biological dad is a Democrat, he's also an abusive jerk and rapist. Sorry but the former doesn't give him a pass.

Fil1957

(922 posts)
21. Anthony Weiner sent dick pictures while he was IN congress. He was caught, and did it again. And was caught again.
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:52 PM
Yesterday

Last edited Sun May 31, 2026, 02:14 PM - Edit history (1)

Then after having been caught twice, he got caught sexting again! This time wearing under shorts lying on a bed with his son.

As if this wasn't enough, he got caught one more time, this time sending porno to a minor, in which he served 15 months in prison.

Platner is nothing like Weiner, who is a covicted felon and registered sex offender.

karynnj

(61,151 posts)
29. Not to mention when he did it again, he HURT HRC's 2016 Campaign
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:06 PM
Yesterday

It was because he was caught again and the FBI got his laptop that they found several Clinton emails that his wife opened on a shared computer when HRC was SoS. These led Comey to announce they were reopening the emails investigation and the. 3 days before the election to announce none were not seen by them before.

I know there was a period when Weiner was popular here because he was outspoken, however that never made him someone either improving Democratic chances or accomplishing anything in the House.

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
33. As far as I can tell, people who do it, usually can't stop.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:08 PM
Yesterday

It's an addiction, no matter what it costs them.

karynnj

(61,151 posts)
37. It really cost him everything he most cared about
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:16 PM
Yesterday

His wife and any political career. It's too bad that he might be to blame for Trump ever becoming President.

stopdiggin

(15,692 posts)
44. We are now to the point where we are DEFENDING Anthony Weiner and his actions ?
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:24 PM
Yesterday

Last edited Sun May 31, 2026, 02:05 PM - Edit history (1)

Wow !
I guess we then have to pose the question ... IS there such a thing as disqualifying character or behavior?
Or have we now entered territory where anything (meaning virtually anything) goes?
All good?

(Note: have NOT put Platner in the same category as Weiner - but the issue remains, does questionable behavior (any behavior?) now becomes 'no go', 'hands off' -- because, 'purity' ?)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

sarisataka

(22,874 posts)
148. As far as I can see the only disqualifier
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:21 PM
Yesterday

is AIPAC money.

Anything else (apparently) up to and including soliciting sex from minors is a "maybe"

Lancero

(3,281 posts)
211. When our measuring stick becomes Trump, everything is permitted.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:08 PM
8 min ago

Gotta appeal to his rotten supporters somehow. Hopefully our party will fare better than the apples did.

ShazzieB

(22,951 posts)
46. Totally different situation.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:24 PM
Yesterday

In case you forgot what Weiner did, he was sexting a 15 year old. He committed a crime, he went to jail for it, and he's now a registered sex offender. No matter how much any of us may have originally liked him, he deserved what he got.

As much talk about pedophiles as there is at DU these days, (calling Trump one, ranting about the Epstein files, etc.) and about Trump and other criminals never having to face justice, I'd call this a win. Here's a sex offender who got caught and paid for it. Losing a popular congressperson sucks, but any other outcome would have been worse.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
58. Weiner and his pedophilia might've cost us the 2016 election
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:43 PM
Yesterday

with the help of DU's great hero, James Comey

dalton99a

(95,666 posts)
2. The oligarchs love to tell the peasants: "Suffering builds character"
Sun May 31, 2026, 11:51 AM
Yesterday

and

"Work harder to get your rewards in heaven"


orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
3. Look at their standard bearer
Sun May 31, 2026, 11:55 AM
Yesterday

TSF, and then look at Platner.

The cognitive dissonance of the purists is staggering.

karynnj

(61,151 posts)
32. The comparison will be Platner vs Collins
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:08 PM
Yesterday

Our hope is enough people will come out to vote to get someone who will with their first vote help us take the majority to put a stop on so many bad things.

delisen

(7,448 posts)
53. Actually Platner's behaviors remind me of Trump.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:35 PM
Yesterday

A lot of Republicans got taken in by Trump and his backers They got taken over and cast aside.

A lot of Democrats are wiser.




BannonsLiver

(20,910 posts)
4. All I care about is winning elections and keeping as many filthy MAGATs out of office as possible.
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:06 PM
Yesterday

That’s my purity stim.

Ferryboat

(1,279 posts)
5. We dumped Al Franklin for what?
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:08 PM
Yesterday

What was gained? Gary Hart , John Edward's both were effective in

politics but certainly had bad judgment in personal matters.

The rethugs have no problem looking the other way. Life is messy and the older I get, the more forgiving I've become.
Being idealistic is for amateurs.

What do we expect from a country founded by Purtitans.

question everything

(52,484 posts)
9. We did not "dump" Al Franken. He resigned, conceded the successful campaign
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:28 PM
Yesterday

that each day brought new “allegations” that demanded his response and interfered with his senatorial work.


LisaL

(47,618 posts)
18. I don't think we gained anything from that situation.
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:49 PM
Yesterday

But Franken was a different story. He was already in a Senate.
This guy isn't even nominated yet.

WhiskeyGrinder

(27,284 posts)
24. As a Minnesotan, I believe Tina Smith was a better senator than Franken, and a case could be made for Franken's
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:58 PM
Yesterday

resignation helping Dems beat Roy Moore that same year.

krawhitham

(5,096 posts)
188. It also saved the ACA
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 11:08 AM
7 hrs ago

When Franken resigned, polling shows Jones losing. Roy Moore, a known PEDOPHILE was leading in the polls

Local TV stations in Alabama were running stories like "Dems are do as I say not as I do", over the Franken accusations

That gave Moore a clear lead in the election in Dec

Emerson +9
CBS News +6
Strategy Research +7

Franken knew if he resigned he would be replace by a Democrat, to ensure that when he announced on December 7, 2017 he would resign, be made his resignation date January 2, 2018. After Tim Waltz would start the job
https://ballotpedia.org/Resignation_of_Al_Franken,_2018

After Franken resigned the winds moved fast in Alabama, most polling showed Jones down a lot just days before the election. but 5 days after Al fell on his sword Jones rallied and barely won the election by a mere 1.5%.

How sad is it that a democrat could only beat a KNOWN PEDOPHILE by 1.5% in Alabama?

Franken resigning helped Jones win, and Jones' vote saved the ACA, PERIOD

EdmondDantes_

(2,146 posts)
30. Being unwilling to keep a serial groper in office is a good thing
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:06 PM
Yesterday

And being against someone repeatedly touching people without their consent isn't puritanical. It's basic appropriate behavior.

Being against a guy who was indicted for campaign finance related to cheating on his dying wife is also a good thing in my view.

And going back 40 years, the world was different. But I'll give you Gary Hart.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
59. Al Franken made a moral decision
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:46 PM
Yesterday

He elevated his party by making it.

He remains a stalwart. He remains invited to all the best parties.

He recognized that he was not owed his seat, and that there were many others that could do the job as well as he could.

So he did the ethical, moral thing and elevated the Democratic party.

DFW

(60,519 posts)
192. Ethics and morals had nothing to do with it.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 01:04 PM
5 hrs ago

From that comment, I can't imagine you have ever talked to him or Norm about it.

He resigned, under undue pressure, because dozens of Democratic senators and the Governor of Minnesota jumped on his back for conveniance (and some for self-promotion of the darlest kind, and I'm NOT talking about Gillibrand or Harris). He had neither the intention or the desire to resitgn, and he wasn't even thinking of taking a bullut for the Party. He resigned with an unimagininable reluctance, weighted down by the unexpected near-unanimity of the puböic verbal trashings from colleagues who he thought knew better (and some did, but were gutless). Some did apologize to him afterward (Tester, Nelson, Whitehouse, e.g.), but most did not. Al was not thinking of the goo9d he would do the Party when he resogned. he was thinking the world had collapsed on him, and he couldn't for the life of him figure out how or why.

Talk to him some time. Better NOT talk to Franni, though. She is still angrier about it than Al is.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
193. He isn't my friend.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 02:55 PM
3 hrs ago

He had a job. He did it well. His replacement is doing just as well.

I don't know why I have to factor his feelings into the calculus.

Plenty of people that work in offices get fired, get forced out, suffer indignities and "office politics".

No elected representative is owed their rank. They must constantly earn trust.

Al Franken was absolutely forced out - but he made the decision to, not anyone else.

He made a moral and ethical call.

BannonsLiver

(20,910 posts)
208. Thank you for keeping Brooklynite's commitment to not-so-humble brags alive and well on this forum after his departure.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 05:52 PM
24 min ago

It’s like we never skipped a beat.

Quiet Em

(3,095 posts)
6. I'll tell you what
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:10 PM
Yesterday

If you want to put all your eggs into the Maine basket go for it.

I'm going to concentrate on GA, NH, NC, TX, OH, MI, and AK.

KPN

(17,542 posts)
8. Thanks for the go ahead on this. I'll concentrate on all of them. All in here -- everywhere.
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:26 PM
Yesterday

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
14. Yep. We are doing it really well.
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:44 PM
Yesterday

Why do we need to nominate someone with so many issues?

Irish_Dem

(82,714 posts)
107. Skittles from the lectures I am receiving today, integrity is a quaint old fashioned notion.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:19 PM
Yesterday

As are good judgement, common sense,
and desire to actual win our battle against the MAGAs.

I come from a military family and learned to be in it to win it.

I can put niceties aside, but cannot endorse abject stupid strategies
guaranteed to make us lose the battle and sell our soul in the process.

Skittles

(173,188 posts)
121. yup, I am a vet, grew up in a military family
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:44 PM
Yesterday

and I don't like military service being used as a defense to act like a fucking asshole.

Nixie

(18,144 posts)
15. Now we see how self-defeating all the purity attacks on a
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:45 PM
Yesterday

popular First Lady were over some industry standard speeches — and she was a proven Democrat over many decades. Attacking her brought us here, fighting to even get back what we had a few short years ago. None of this would be happening.

In the meantime, the war on millionaires and billionaires seems to be over in certain purity circles — a billionaire is bring actively pushed in California.

So all the reverse psychology attempts fall quite short of reality.

mcar

(46,432 posts)
56. Yes. And it's interesting that many of the people
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:40 PM
Yesterday

who were on social media slamming HRC because she (gasp) gave speeches, who proudly voted for Jill Stein and who were the same people who screamed about "Killer Kamala" are now the ones lecturing us about "purity politics."

Nixie

(18,144 posts)
156. Exactly! As if we wouldn't notice the switcheroo and amnesia
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:56 PM
Yesterday

about what the purity tests really were about. You nailed it. 👍🏼

Cha

(320,979 posts)
169. Yeah, I noticed.
Sun May 31, 2026, 10:14 PM
20 hrs ago
Thanks for saying that.

The "purity tests" were okay for VP Kamala Harris when so much was at stake.

But don't even have an opinion on this if you don't live in Maine. It's the hypocrisy.

P.S., I wish he would stop tearing down Democrats. We need to win across the Country to take back the Midterms. He can't do it alone.

betsuni

(29,354 posts)
181. *poof* all the dramatic vote-my-conscience moral purity turns into pragmatism, big tent, think of the majority.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 04:29 AM
13 hrs ago

HILARIOUS! Not even a "hold my nose" or "lesser of two evils." Well, the true evil was giving a paid speech , right geniuses.

duckworth969

(1,425 posts)
19. Clicks
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:49 PM
Yesterday

Feeding the clicks is unhelpful.

Neither is keeping the issue alive.

People of Maine, decide not someone from Topeka.

Yeah, it blows. Shake yer head and grouse all you want in private.

But NOT online.

Don’t feed the machine, that’s a vote for the Bad Guys.

orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
69. When I saw the headlines
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:55 PM
Yesterday

They read like this was breaking news, that he had been sexting women during the campaign.

Upon reading, it turned out this happened during a rocky period early in the marriage, his wife said they had worked through it and she was 100% behind him, and had confided in a campaign aide who betrayed her.

Ratfucking by the corporate media, pure and simple

stopdiggin

(15,692 posts)
23. So sh*tty behavior now becomes "nothing to see here". 'Cause - 'purity'
Sun May 31, 2026, 12:57 PM
Yesterday

Gotcha !!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Red Mountain

(2,388 posts)
26. Hardly
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:04 PM
Yesterday

feel free to criticize the behavior and expect him to behave.

After the election, if he's our candidate.

stopdiggin

(15,692 posts)
67. Personally think that the latest round of 'concern' is primarily click bait media stuff
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:53 PM
Yesterday

(this was dealt with months ago)
I also think that Platner has proven himself (all by himself, and on a number of different fronts) to be a questionable 'pick'

If he turns out to be 'your guy', then so be it. But - have to admit there's a big "Sheeesh" involved there too.

Red Mountain

(2,388 posts)
129. Totally admit it
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:11 PM
Yesterday

wouldn't try and pretend otherwise. He's a flawed candidate.

He's also proven himself, on a number of different fronts, to be a candidate who says a lot of things voters want to hear.

Does he believe them? Is he just pretending to be a Dem?

My guess is yes and no.

Either way, better than the alternative. Hopefully.

stopdiggin

(15,692 posts)
163. and, in turn - I will not be arguing at all that there isn't occasion when it is appropriate (perhaps imperative?)
Sun May 31, 2026, 07:48 PM
22 hrs ago

Last edited Mon Jun 1, 2026, 11:15 AM - Edit history (1)

to be pulling the lever for ' the lesser of two .. '
That's just plain common sense - and hard won knowledge of bedrock reality, and necessity.

My argument would remain with those that would imply that these things (issues of character) - simply don't matter any more ... Because .. "the world we live in .. " - "the other side .." and yada, yada. It DOES still matter. And I'll not be talked down from pointing to a lack ... (honesty, decency, basic moral character, etc.) If I have to elect a person with a questionable track record - so be it. But please don't tell me I'm not suppose to notice (or comment on) all the warts in evidence.

betsuni

(29,354 posts)
25. Accusing Democrats of being bought and paid for ('corporate Dems') is the worst purity test and not true.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:03 PM
Yesterday

Anyone damaging the Democratic Party with lies that they're corrupt, "ignore" the working class, don't fight, both sides, all is lost, is basking in their own stupidity for nothing.

Platner's situation isn't a purity test.

jmbar2

(8,214 posts)
27. As a woman, Platner creeps me out
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:05 PM
Yesterday

After MeToo, Epstein, Swallwell, tRump, Hegseth, etc., we should recognize this behavior. Exploitive, narcissistic, and entitled behavior towards women. And women are supposed to shut up about it and "stand by our man".

Yeah, he says all the right stuff, he's charismatic, and we really need Maine. But he treats women like crap, and we are supposed to shut up.

The video from his wife was painful to watch. Their marriage is still young. They have invested their whole lives into getting him elected, and now could lose it all because of his entitled dick. His wife is having to fall on her sword, and try to save his candidacy because they will both lose a lot if he gets dumped. Double penalty for her - getting cheated on, and now having to save him from the consequences of his selfish, entitled behaviors.

Not mentioned are the responses of the other women he has been harassing. Most of them are probably Dems. They are put in the same spot. Because of the precarity of the seat, they have to keep silent about what he's been up to. We don't have the full picture on that, and may never know because of the pressure on them to not talk, or lose the seat.

All of the women are expected to shut up and support him because we want the seat. We have learned nothing from the victims.

SMDH...

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
31. That's how I feel.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:07 PM
Yesterday

Why do we need to nominate someone with that kind of issues? And who knows what else is going to come out. Susan Collins is presumably waiting until after the primary to release her opposition research.

questionseverything

(12,017 posts)
36. This opposition research comes from Collins main supporter, AIPAC
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:16 PM
Yesterday

Anyone who doesn’t support the murder and mayhem Israel heaps on the rest of the world gets millions spent against them by AIPAC and the minions they pay…:

MorbidButterflyTat

(4,821 posts)
62. Yes, where are the women?
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:49 PM
Yesterday

As usual, expected to sit down and shut up, get over it and disappear while the entitled white guy "saves" us.

Excellent post.

orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
76. Same go for Bill Clinton?
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:59 PM
Yesterday

He actually was unfaithful while in office.

I had the best 8 years of my life under Bill Clinton, and actually was able to break out of poverty and enjoy my life during his terms.

What he did with his dick was between him, Lewinsky and Hillary and was none of my fucking business, as I see it.

jmbar2

(8,214 posts)
92. He was a sleaze, but had a track record and a weak opponent.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:06 PM
Yesterday

Platner is an unknown opportunist with poor judgment, who treats women like crap. I don't live in Maine, but given the choice between two unknowns, would prefer they elect the other Dem without the baggage.

stopdiggin

(15,692 posts)
88. thank you for framing this with such clarity and perspective. needed to be said! - - - - - -(nt)-
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:04 PM
Yesterday

pinkstarburst

(2,098 posts)
130. Agreed
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:17 PM
Yesterday

This is not my race to vote in, but I cannot believe there is not a single qualified candidate in all of Maine that we could have run.

TheSphinx

(8 posts)
34. Anyone concerned about a candidates personal life over their ability to push the party agenda...
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:13 PM
Yesterday

should maybe think about leaving party politics all together.

Politics is not for the weak stomachs.

TheSphinx

(8 posts)
45. Americans as a whole arent concerned either..
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:24 PM
Yesterday

or else we would have President Harris right now.

They chose excrement in human form over a perfectly qualified woman because he campaigned on quickly and forcefully improving the cost of living. They were lies of course, but it shows how you win elections.

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
52. Yea, well, how is it working out?
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:33 PM
Yesterday

Did the cost of living improve any?
Or are we all going downhill in a handbasket? Should you be believing a known liar?
Maybe we shouldn't just be concerned with winning elections, but whether the candidate is actually going to deliver on whatever they are promising?

TheSphinx

(8 posts)
77. Trump couldnt care less. But guess what? He WON
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:59 PM
Yesterday

In party politics that's ALL that matters. Winning.

Leave the policy to the policy wonks, not the candidate.

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
82. Yes, I am sure Trump is happy he won.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:01 PM
Yesterday

If that's the goal of the election, to make the candidate happy?

mr715

(4,376 posts)
101. The goal of the election is to win the election.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:13 PM
Yesterday

I seem to suspect 2016 Trump was probably very upset he lost because he didn't seem to want the gig.

If a politician is happy they won an election, it better be because they can deliver on their promises to improve the lives of those that voted for them.

Otherwise, I hope that a dour and internalize the gravity of the responsibility of their investiture.

sop

(19,512 posts)
54. I don't vote for candidates in the general election because I like them, I vote for candidates who will push the
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:37 PM
Yesterday

Democratic party's progressive agenda and ideals forward most effectively. It's a pragmatic choice, not a personality contest.

Skittles

(173,188 posts)
65. there's "personal life" and then there is a misogynistic creep with a nazi tattoo
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:51 PM
Yesterday

politics shouldn't include THAT, especially Democrats

TBF

(37,377 posts)
72. I really hate this attitude. Trump is not "winning" -
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:56 PM
Yesterday

the guy is barely alive at this point, is the most hated man on this planet, and Americans are NOT better off.

The fact that he was able to pull a coup on the government is not something to emulate, it is something he should serve time for. There is no way I can look at what he has done and say "Oh it looks like that works - let's do that team blue".

Just no.

What we need to get tough on is resisting in a way that CAN take him down. The complete Epstein files should have been released years ago, and I have some good guesses as to why they weren't. Let the chips fall where they may and release them now.

MorbidButterflyTat

(4,821 posts)
120. Tom Massie said he's going to identify more individuals whose names were redacted from the Piggy/Epstein files
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:41 PM
Yesterday

I hope he means it.

TheSphinx

(8 posts)
131. I'm sorry but, you cant take down an enemy if you are unwilling to match or exceed their energy
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:18 PM
Yesterday

This is true in any war or competition.

Biden thought he could "turn the page" on Trump and beat him by ignoring him and look what happened.
They took advantage of that and RAN HIM OVER.

MAGA is ruthless against us with no shame and if we cant strike fear into their hearts then they will keep beating us over the head. We are at risk of losing 2 more SCOTUS seats for fucks sake.

Nice time is over.

TBF

(37,377 posts)
132. That is absolutely not what I said, but nice try Ace
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:35 PM
Yesterday

I said RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES.

Are you afraid of what's in there? I'm not. They already took down a Prince, let's take down the rest of the MFer's.

Is that tough enough for you? I think they not only raped and brutalized girls, I think it's possible they killed some of them. It's time to release it all. As I said above, let the chips fall where they may - and I mean that.

TheSphinx

(8 posts)
136. Yea and the Epstein files are almost completely out of the news cycle right now..
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:56 PM
Yesterday

Calling for things do NOTHING. Take action. Trump feels cozy and safe enough to promote and broadcast a trashy UFC fight on the White House lawn.

If Dems were smart at countering Trumps misdirection tactics, they would use that opportunity to embarrass him on national TV and draw attention back to the files. Get someone to get in front of the cameras with photos of Epstein and Trump.

Organize a protest close to the WH and use airhorns to drown out the talking and disrupt the fight.

TBF

(37,377 posts)
138. "the news cycle" is owned by Trump's billionaire friends
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:02 PM
Yesterday

I do like the airhorn idea, though, that has merit.

TBF

(37,377 posts)
133. lol
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:37 PM
Yesterday

For some reason the new bouncer is afraid of the Epstein files. But I'm not. Release them all, clean house. Starting with the White House.

Nanjeanne

(6,679 posts)
41. Considering no one has said what the texts say or who they were actually sent to -- and Im sure
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:20 PM
Yesterday

they would have had this been a case of underage girls or unsolicited, etc - it basically shows a guy who chose poor judgment in his marriage and it’s up to his wife to forgive him. Sexting is a newer phenomenon and it’s done by many many people. Had texts been a thing years ago Im quite sure we would have found many of our politicians involved in it. If I way this against getting universal healthcare, decent and affordable housing, education and wages — it’s desperation on the part of some anti Platner people in search of a story.

questionseverything

(12,017 posts)
48. AIPAC has unleashed millions to defeat platner
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:27 PM
Yesterday

That’s the real story here

When AIPAC is pissed the candidate is doing something right!

FascismIsDeath

(277 posts)
43. Or we could develop better red flag detectors, because they were jumping out at me several months ago.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:23 PM
Yesterday

A lot of us warned folks that this guy had too much baggage. If we don't beat Collins this time, the people who refused to listen and continued to back this guy when we had a chance at choosing someone without all the drama will be squarely to blame for it.

surfered

(14,577 posts)
47. I don't have a vote in Maine snd not telling those that do how to vote.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:25 PM
Yesterday

But Platner did this to himself. If reporting is correct, he texted multiple women. How could he expect it not to come out?

Skittles

(173,188 posts)
49. surely there is some common ground between creep-with-nazi-tattoo and the perfect candidate
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:29 PM
Yesterday

WTF

Irish_Dem

(82,714 posts)
55. For sure, let men be sexual deviants. Boys will be boys.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:38 PM
Yesterday

And heck, woman are just asking for it anyway, right.

And if they are child rapists, all the better.

Irish_Dem

(82,714 posts)
100. So married men sexting strangers is the same as just having an affair?
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:12 PM
Yesterday

I want to make sure I am adhering to the new morality correctly.

Americans are fine with men raping and beating up children.
So I guess everything else is fine now too.

That makes it easy.
Anything men do sexually is A-OK.
The victims be damned.

Just like the old days.
The patriarchy is alive and well.

orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
105. Strangers?
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:17 PM
Yesterday

As in he just sexted women who had no idea at all of who he was?

I'm sorry, I didn't read that anywhere

From his wife -

"“I confided deeply personal details about my marriage to someone I considered a friend,” she said. “I trusted this person with the most private chapter of our lives — the early days of our marriage before any campaign was on our mind.”

“Our marriage today is stronger than ever before,” she added. “I know the man I married and the husband he has been to me on the best and the worst days of my life. That hasn’t changed, and it won’t.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/30/us/politics/graham-platner-maine-senate-texts.html


Or doesn't her opinion count?

Have a great day.



Irish_Dem

(82,714 posts)
111. He was on KIK, online site for teens and tweens.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:22 PM
Yesterday

But as you keep telling me, it is all fine and OK.

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
171. He used KIK.
Sun May 31, 2026, 10:27 PM
19 hrs ago

Here. you can view his alleged profile in a towel. At least he is wearing a towel. Could have been worse, I suppose.

"Law enforcement officials at the time described Kik as “the problem app of the moment,” noting it was used by roughly 40 percent of American teenagers."
https://www.themainewire.com/2026/05/maine-democratic-senate-candidate-graham-platner-kept-sexually-suggestive-account-on-app-dubbed-predators-paradise/

orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
172. Please don't quote right wing sources here
Sun May 31, 2026, 10:30 PM
19 hrs ago

Yes, The Maine Wire is widely recognized as a right-wing publication. It operates as the media arm of the Maine Policy Institute (formerly the Maine Heritage Policy Center), which is a conservative public policy think tank

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
173. You asked for a source. I got you a source.
Sun May 31, 2026, 10:32 PM
19 hrs ago

Next time specify that you only accept left wing sources. Considering it has a photo of him (at least the tattoos match) in a towel, WTF does it matter if it's a right wing publication or not?

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
175. Here. I am not sure what qualifies as not a right wing source,
Sun May 31, 2026, 10:41 PM
19 hrs ago

but can I link to cnn?
It doesn't have a photo of him in a towel (only the description of it), though, but he used KIK.
"CNN has not independently confirmed the existence of the text messages. CNN did verify that an account on the messaging app Kik appears to belong to Platner. The account, under the username “phustle0331,” features a profile photo showing Platner shirtless in a bathroom with a towel on his waist and uses a handle similar to ones on his since-deleted Reddit account and a now-deleted Instagram account."
https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/31/politics/graham-platner-democrats-campaign-revelations

Exultant Democracy

(6,601 posts)
187. Some people really want to stick their heads in the ground even when everything is on the line.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 10:51 AM
7 hrs ago

Platner was a bad idea from the start, got worse, and the progressive media bubble kept feeding him. Mills was going to be a slam dunk for the general, and the stupid money pissed it all away.
This should have been done and over with the Nazi tattoo.
The good news is that the primary is still over a week away, so it's not too late to right the ship and cruise into an easy general with a well-vetted Democratic candidate.

Emile

(43,535 posts)
191. Mills dropped out of the race. Unless
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 12:50 PM
5 hrs ago

she re-enters the race, her name will not be on the November ballot.

Exultant Democracy

(6,601 posts)
204. Yes hence the stupid money already pissed away the best chance, but David Costello is a fine backup
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 04:12 PM
2 hrs ago

Not a walking disaster like Platner.
Really, the Nazi tattoo should have been the end of this, while Mill's was still in the race. The best time to dump Platner was when the Nazi tattoo came out; the next best time to dump him is right now while the democratic party stiill has time to step away from his political death spiral.

Exultant Democracy

(6,601 posts)
176. Exceptions are permitted if you provide a clear reason for doing so that is consistent with the values of this website.
Sun May 31, 2026, 11:04 PM
19 hrs ago

You asked for a source; that is a clear reason for doing it. It also does us no good to not know how this story is evolving across the media landscape. In this instance, the reason for citing this source is clear and consistent with the values of helping us support the best candidate on June 9th. Maine democrats still have time to change course, and it is very fair for people on this site who feel alarmed by Planter to build the case for why he is a coin flip in a race where a boring D could win in a walk, given the polling data.

Response to Exultant Democracy (Reply #176)

orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
183. Quoting a right wing think tank to attack a Democratic candidate
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 08:49 AM
9 hrs ago

Is consistent with the values of DU?

OK, got it.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
194. Its okay -- purity test for thee not for me.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:01 PM
3 hrs ago

It is almost like some people are so upset that Janet Mills couldn't put together a campaign that they prefer Susan Collins.

If I hear the phrase "purity test" one more time when I support anti-genocide candidates I will lose my mind.

MorbidButterflyTat

(4,821 posts)
203. Nothing says "class" or "dignity" like a headless mirror selfie
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:59 PM
2 hrs ago

and a toilet with the seat up in the background!

OMG!

Oops, am I allowed an opinion about this? I forget!

Response to orangecrush (Reply #105)

mr715

(4,376 posts)
195. Enough to hoodwink stalwart Democrats on DU
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:08 PM
3 hrs ago

I do hope Mainers are more able to understand the realities of politics on the ground (and in the air and on the water)

Response to orangecrush (Original post)

mr715

(4,376 posts)
97. She is concerned that all her support comes from a Democratic message board.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:11 PM
Yesterday

The GOP ones are thrilled that they get a merc with a former nazi tattoo. They ain't deep thinkers.

RandySF

(86,778 posts)
61. Did he have an affair
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:47 PM
Yesterday

or did he send texts to women out of the blue? One of these is harassment.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
96. Well, first a man and woman say they like each other...
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:10 PM
Yesterday

Then, sometimes, they might send a message that says something a little risque like "You look so pretty holding that No More Genocide Sign", and then it just spirals from there.

Maybe they weren't random.

Maybe we should let him and his wife handle this.

Maybe sex is fine.

MorbidButterflyTat

(4,821 posts)
123. So he had affairs with all these women?
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:52 PM
Yesterday

Or maybe his wife of two years was simply a necessary encumbrance to enhance his Senate campaign? Like denying a Nazi tat is a Nazi tat?

He and his wife could've handled it privately if he wasn't running for office.

I bet his wife doesn't think her husband's sex and apparent relationships with other women is "fine."

TBF

(37,377 posts)
140. I wouldn't bet the farm on that.
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:07 PM
Yesterday

There are plenty of women who stay with men because there are myriad issues that come up if you've been married a long time - you've got intermingled families, kids, a good income, health insurance - and all of a sudden, the spouse is in the spotlight with a stupid mistake (or mistakes). Hillary Clinton even did it, and she was pretty accomplished on her own. It's not just that women are brought up to "stand by their man" - there are a lot of practical reasons, especially if you're over 40 and gave up your career (if you ever had one) to raise your kids.

She may have the independent funds to leave, she may not. She may be watching to see how this race plays out. Maybe she's willing to forgive him to keep the status quo. Women can be very pragmatic. But I wouldn't assume she still loves him.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
142. Open relationships are a thing.
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:12 PM
Yesterday

There is a vast spectrum of love out there. Maybe they're best friends but they don't have sex. Maybe they've come to terms with that. Maybe they haven't.

It is still nonetheless not my business, nor does it speak to policy outcomes. It is only if we assume malice or illegality does this become an issue of political relevance in re: the Senate race.

Incidentally, I watched her video. I think I sensed that she was deeply hurt and suspect she was just straight up cheated on. Which makes Graham Platner a bad guy, but still a better one than Susan Collins. And still a better political player than his opponent in Janet Mills, even though I supported her.

TBF

(37,377 posts)
144. It's Maine, not my state so I'll let the voters decide -
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:17 PM
Yesterday

but I did want to clarify the point on women and why they stay in crappy relationships.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
146. I don't want to reduce anyone's agency.
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:19 PM
Yesterday

Relationships are about choices between individuals, and I hope Graham Platner's wife is in a situation where she can make hers. If she were in an abusive relationship, I would be one of the first people on this forum for ditching Platner.

TBF

(37,377 posts)
152. I pray she is not in an abusive relationship - whether mental or physical
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:27 PM
Yesterday

that just amplifies all the rest I spoke about and makes it worse.

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
149. Yep, and it's called cheating, as far as I can tell.
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:21 PM
Yesterday

As far as I am concerned, this dude is a cheating creep.
At least I don't live in Maine so I don't have to vote for him.

jmbar2

(8,214 posts)
154. My hunch is that ALL of their shared assets are wrapped up in his campaign
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:35 PM
Yesterday

If he falls, she loses everything. He has put her in a very tight spot.

TBF

(37,377 posts)
155. I wouldn't be surprised -
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:43 PM
Yesterday

and I really wouldn't want to be in the shoes of Maine voters, either. I'm not trying to judge them for unseating Susan Collins even if it is messy. Similarly, a tight spot. She really has done a lot of damage over the years.

MineralMan

(151,722 posts)
63. How many in this thread even vote in that state?
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:49 PM
Yesterday

What's the point, really. Who's running in YOUR state and what are you doing about that?

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
66. He is running for Senate so this affects all of us.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:52 PM
Yesterday

Whether we live in Maine or not.

MineralMan

(151,722 posts)
71. And yet, you do not vote there.
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:56 PM
Yesterday

Who is running for Senate in YOUR state? How is that campaign doing? What about your House district? Would you like my opinion about who you should vote for?

Why do we focus on other people's elections. What influence do we have if we don't live there?

Maine will sort out its own election, I have no doubt. I will not think any more about it, because I have zero influence there. I'd rather any Democrat over Susan Collins, of course.

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
73. Why do we focus on any elections?
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:58 PM
Yesterday

I don't get your point.
And our primary (in my state) is already over.

MineralMan

(151,722 posts)
93. I can tell you why I focus on elections in Minnesota.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:07 PM
Yesterday

We have a Governor to elect here. We have a Senator to elect here. I have a House representative to elect Here. I have a state Senator and a state House member to elect here. So, I'm focused on those. I'm not going to bother you with those elections, though. You have nothing whatsoever to do with the, and I'm not interested in what you think about them. You don't vote here.

So, that's what I focus on.

Your primary elections are over? Then it's time to start working on electing people in your general election, isn't it. How's that going? What are you doing in those races? Why are you bothering about Maine? Do you want my opinion of your candidates? You'll have to tell me who they are, see? If I have time, I'll look at them, if you like.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
168. You have a particularly interesting governor to elect.
Sun May 31, 2026, 10:11 PM
20 hrs ago

I look forward to hearing about the governance of the honorable former Senator Klobacher

Response to LisaL (Reply #73)

stopdiggin

(15,692 posts)
113. And the primary in Texas (et.al.) was not of national significance? I think
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:23 PM
Yesterday

you're being a bit myopic here.
People are interested in Platner (and that race) because ...
He's definitely a 'character' - and at the same time might represent defining character - for a party and country.

Does this guy represent who we are? (and not just Mainers, but Democrats and/or Americans as a whole?)

Skittles

(173,188 posts)
70. this is a POLITICAL BOARD
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:56 PM
Yesterday

we talk about POLITICS AND POLITICIANS, and not just the ones in our own states

Response to LisaL (Reply #74)

MineralMan

(151,722 posts)
78. You know what is POLITICAL?
Sun May 31, 2026, 01:59 PM
Yesterday

Unless you have influence somewhere on the elections there, nothing you say matters, frankly.

How are elections going in your own state? Who is running for Senate and your House district? Do you want my opinion about that? Sorry, I'm busy here in my own state with elections here. Go and vote and get out the vote where you live. That's POLITICAL!

Ishoutandscream2

(6,791 posts)
116. I'm pretty sure you and I
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:24 PM
Yesterday

Understand our state quite well. Doesn’t mean we can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. But, he obviously knows more things than the rest of us do.

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
85. If you are only concered about your own state, why use a discussion board
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:03 PM
Yesterday

with people from all the states? Seem like you should be posting on some local board, then.

MineralMan

(151,722 posts)
95. Oh, dear! Well, you see, there are also national Politics.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:10 PM
Yesterday

We share a President and Vice President, don't we, along with all of their appointees. People from all states vote for them. So, here I am. I do hope you don't mind, but I'm not going anywhere.

Why are you questioning my presence on a national political discussion forum?

That's troubling to me, somehow.

Ishoutandscream2

(6,791 posts)
104. That's who he is
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:17 PM
Yesterday

Like I mentioned above. He has a sense of superiority and talks down to others.

sarisataka

(22,874 posts)
81. This is a different Democratic Party
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:01 PM
Yesterday

Being concerned about a candidate's history of homophobia, misogyny, rape apologism, potential Nazi sympathies and possible sexual harassment is "basking in purity"

I'm not sure if I am a fan; the old version feels more like what we claim to stand for; the compromises appear to be what we once criticized in others.

orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
91. ...
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:06 PM
Yesterday

Same go for Bill Clinton?

He actually was unfaithful while in office.

I had the best 8 years of my life under Bill Clinton, and actually was able to break out of poverty and enjoy my life during his terms.

What he did with his dick was between him, Lewinsky and Hillary and was none of my fucking business, as I see it.

sarisataka

(22,874 posts)
112. Did Bill Clinton recount his homophobic jokes
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:23 PM
Yesterday

did he suggest woman were responsible when they are raped
did he "unknowingly" wear a Totenkopf for twenty years

There are things that were once disqualifiers as breaches of our core values that we now casually dismiss. I do not like what that says about our commitment to our values. It reminds me too much of the end of Animal Farm.

stopdiggin

(15,692 posts)
118. sounds a bit like a, "but Mussolini made the trains run on time .. " type of argument
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:34 PM
Yesterday

always been a bit suspect in the Ethics 101 department.

(Oh - and incidentally, he really didn't .. _

EX500rider

(12,799 posts)
126. Don't forget Blackwater merc and to me, questionable finances
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:00 PM
Yesterday

He a "hard working oyster farmer" who also gets $4800 a month from the VA for 100% disability.
To avoid going over income limits for that, he pays his wife instead of himself for both the campaign work & oyster biz work.

A former Platner campaign aide told the Substack Judge Street Journal that the campaign paid a salary to Platner's wife rather than to Platner himself "for a few reasons": "One, the optics of a candidate drawing a salary from the campaign committee isn't great, though I don't think your family getting paid from the campaign committee is great either," the staffer said in November. "Two, if Graham drew a salary from the campaign, his disability status and his disability payments would be put at risk."

Blue Full Moon

(3,693 posts)
110. AIPAC buying an election again.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:22 PM
Yesterday

After Trump and Bush Sr.

I will say what I said when they did this crap to Clinton. It's the Platner's business and no one else.

ShazzieB

(22,951 posts)
102. This is up to the voters in Maine.
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:14 PM
Yesterday

I live over 1,000 miles from Maine. If I lived there, I would vote for whatever Democratic candidate ran against Collins. I don't, so it's not my call.

Should the Maine Dems have vetted him more thoroughly? Maybe. Could they have found a candidate with less "baggage"? Maybe, but I wouldn't bet on it. Imo, Platner's "baggage" has been blown way out of proportion, imo, and there's no guarantee of that not happening to anyone else who ends up running against Collins in November.

These days, it's possible to find "dirt" on almost anyone. Right now, there are bots working around the clock to dig up something that can be used against any Democrat who has a chance of flipping a red Senate seat to blue, because the margin there is so razor thin. Republican strategists are worried about the midterms, they're frighteningly skilled at turning molehills into mountains, and they're funded by billionaires with endless resources. They can find a way to tar anybody.

Meanshile, Mainers obviously like this man, and they're the ones who are going to decide this. The rest of us need to keep our eyes on the prize - flipping Collins' seat to blue - and support Platner if Mainers choose to put him on the ballot in November. Priorities, people.

EX500rider

(12,799 posts)
127. "Platner's "baggage" has been blown way out of proportion"
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:04 PM
Yesterday

20 years with a SS tattoo & working as a Blackwater merc & very questionable online posts are just the facts to me, not sure how you "blow" those up, they are what they are.

ShazzieB

(22,951 posts)
139. It wasn't an "SS" tattoo.
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:02 PM
Yesterday

It was a drawing of a skull that was similar but not identical to the image the SS used. Many people (including me) who have actually seen what the tattoo looks like have said they never would've connected it with the SS or with Nazis. Also, he was very young and drunk at the time. When he found out what it was, he had it covered (because covering a tattoo is much faster, easier, and cheaper than having one removed). So yes, the tattoo has been blown WAY out of proportion, imo.

As for the Reddit posts, they were also made a long time ago when he was much more immature and also dealing with mental health issues. I can easily believe that a young man could make comments online that are not a reflection of his opinions years later. He has admitted they were wrong.

The Blackwater thing is icky, but he was just out of the service at the time, didn't know what to do with himself, and was attracted to it because it sounded like what he'd been doing for the past few years and felt familiar. Big deal.

The sexting is also icky, but it's private business. It's not criminal as long as everyone involved was a consenting adult, and I'm sure we'd have been told by now if they weren't.

None of this stuff is anything to be proud of, but I think it's been taken out of context and spun to seem much worse than it really is. I expected many people would disagree when I made that post, but that's life.

LisaL

(47,618 posts)
143. This guy is 41 years old.
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:16 PM
Yesterday

At some point, is he going to be considered a mature adult? Seems like he should be, at 41. His sexting didn't happen many years ago. It's not a youthful indiscretion
As far as I am concerned, it's not showing good judgement on his part.

EX500rider

(12,799 posts)
157. Yeah, no, it was (and he does not deny it) a SS Totenkopf, no doubt about that
Sun May 31, 2026, 05:04 PM
Yesterday
?quality=75&strip=all&w=1200

And having it for almost 20 years leads me to 2 conclusions, he knew what it was (and friends have said he did) and left it there until called out about it or he was too stupid to know he had a SS tattoo (not just any SS but the Death Camp guards tattoo), neither a good look IMO ymmv

ShazzieB

(22,951 posts)
162. Yes, he found out what it was because people recognized it and told him.
Sun May 31, 2026, 06:41 PM
23 hrs ago

He has always said he had no idea what it was when he got it, that he picked it out of a book the tattoo artist had. That sounds 100% believable to me. When I was researching this thing myself, I found a Reddit thread about it (in r/Maine, linked below) where people were talking about it. Some were horrified by it, but a lot of others said they would never have recognized it as a Nazi symbol. (I didn't know what it was myself.) There were also some vets talking about stupid stuff they did when they were in the military. A lot of people said they believed him when he said he didn't know what it was when he got it. Here's a link to that thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Maine/comments/1odcx9l/graham_platners_new_tattoo/

The Reddit discussion was of course inconclusive, just a bunch of people expressing their opinions, but reading the comments there helped me clarify my own thinking on the matter.

Imo, the Totenkopf is one of those things that if you know what it is, you can't unsee its meaning, but from what I've been able to glean, there are a loads of people who just see a skull with no particular associations other than Halloween or maybe pirates. I was one of those people myself until this thing with Platner hit the fan, so I'm not about to insist that ANYONE with such a tattoo MUST have known what it meant and deliberately chose it for its SS associations.

I admittedly have not looked into any of the other stuff as deeply as I have with the tattoo (although I plan to do so now), and I'm really not interested in getting into any protracted arguments about Platner's fitness for office. I expressed an opinion that I expected would be controversial, and I (rightly) assumed some would disagree. C'est la vie.

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,783 posts)
159. The tattoo really pesters me
Sun May 31, 2026, 05:23 PM
Yesterday

I have seen a great deal on this. This is just one example that Collins would use against Platner in a general election campaign.





I have seen some other oppo that pesters me including the material on this thread.

TommyT139

(2,435 posts)
178. No, not "a long time ago."
Sun May 31, 2026, 11:36 PM
18 hrs ago
As recently as 2021.

https://www.advocate.com/politics/graham-platner-homophobic-posts

Obviously he's the Dem candidate, but let's not gloss over the many many many flaws here.

Samael13

(136 posts)
108. I don't live there so i dont have a vote or voice there
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:21 PM
Yesterday

But i really dont think this is a purity thing or anything like that the voters chose him and in the end thats their decision. We can all think what we want supporter or not unless we live there we dont get a say and I wont shame democrats in another state for voting who they feel best represents them

RockRaven

(19,804 posts)
122. People talk like they are voting for the person, or not. The reality of how Congress works
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:46 PM
Yesterday

means that you are voting for the Party to have a majority and therefore control, or not. That's it. That is the choice: which party do you want to have power. The people don't matter much by comparison.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
128. This.
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:08 PM
Yesterday

We are not marrying them.

They are not our friends.

They are not our heroes.

They are not owed our faith.

They are vehicles for policy, that is all.

They are bound by principles to do least harm, but they by their very nature will do some harm.

This is why I am annoyed when people are on a first name basis with their candidates, or go looking for heroes.



PS - I'm a hypocrite because Sec. Clinton is a hero of mine.

TBF

(37,377 posts)
135. OK, I will explain w/an example. MAGATS embrace the party -
Sun May 31, 2026, 03:50 PM
Yesterday

they care not about all of the heinous things Trump has done in his past, is doing currently, and will do in his (hopefully limited) future. They say things like "we need abortion illegal in all 50 states - Trump will do it for us". And he packs the court to try to get there. Here in Texas I literally saw things like that on my facebook feed.

But what else is he doing? He is making himself nearly as wealthy as the rest of the billionaires he is protecting, he is completely ignoring the courts and congress in favor of authoritarian rule, he is an adjudicated sexual offender, he is defacing our White House, he has dismantled our great society, and the list goes on and on.

THAT is what you get when you completely ignore "people" and just focus on party. That is what MAGATs did, and now they're trying to pay for their $5/gallon gas w/the rest of us.

I'm not saying you shouldn't look at the platform and generally go with them - but if you have one candidate that stinks to high heaven, yes, I'm saying - slow down and took a look at that person.

stopdiggin

(15,692 posts)
124. or, conversely - do we now endorse the notion that our star football player
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:55 PM
Yesterday

really CAN get away with murder ( figuratively?, literally? ) - as long as he scores us enough touchdowns?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

delisen

(7,448 posts)
141. So far I am impressed by McDonald, if that is who you are referring to.
Sun May 31, 2026, 04:12 PM
Yesterday

Last edited Sun May 31, 2026, 04:54 PM - Edit history (1)

The stories about Morris Katz, Platner’s advisor, are disturbing.

delisen

(7,448 posts)
158. Good question. I would vote for Costello, other dem in the race.
Sun May 31, 2026, 05:10 PM
Yesterday

Costello is Blue and has much experience but his campaign did not resonate so far.

I would be unlikely vote for Platner because of his lies. If the reports that his campaign guru , Morris Katz, threatened Genevieve McDonald are true, I would definitely not vote ,for Platner.



W_HAMILTON

(10,454 posts)
179. Many of Platner's earliest and most fervent supporters are ones that started this purity bullshit.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 12:18 AM
17 hrs ago

It's interesting that NOW they want the purity tests to end, with this obviously deeply flawed candidate who keeps stepping on his own dick.

Too bad they didn't end them back with Hillary, Biden, Kamala, etc.

betsuni

(29,354 posts)
182. The original recipe purity test of Medicare for All or you're a corrupt corporate shill who hates universal health care
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 05:25 AM
12 hrs ago

is still popular. The magical three words of pointless division.

WhiskeyGrinder

(27,284 posts)
185. "We can bask in our purity As we sit in places like Delaney Hall, after they round us up."
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 10:09 AM
8 hrs ago

whew that threat didn't age well

Nanjeanne

(6,679 posts)
186. I get Linda Tripp vibes re Genevieve McDonald. Do I give a shit about "sexting"? Not one bit as long as
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 10:25 AM
7 hrs ago

he wasn’t sexting underage women or unsolicited stalking. I care no more about his personal relationship with his wife as long as he isn’t an abuser. I didn’t care about Bill and Hillary’s personal relationship either. And I dont give a fuck about JFK or FDR or any other politician’s marital relationships that don’t encompass dangerous or illegal acts.

What bothers me the most about this whole thing and causes my suspicions to rise is the eagerness of the media to slog through this, trotting out Democratic consultants to bring up every negative detail and discuss Platner being a dangerous pick and how there’s still time to write in Janet Mills yada yada yada. Much too much coordination for this cynic to not believe this smacks more of a Democrat strategy than anything coming from the Collins camp. Add to that - Corey Booker and Hakeem Jeffries and their “concerns” and once again the Democrats choose to discuss another Democrat who could quite possibly have won another Senate seat for Democrats rather than turn their attention to the dangers of a Republican like Susan Collins who only strengthens Trumps stranglehold on getting anything done that benefits people’s lives. Not one of us is affected by what Platner and his wife have gotten through. But Susan Collins - she affects my life much more.

mr715

(4,376 posts)
196. Marmishness
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:16 PM
3 hrs ago

Oooo sex naughty naughty.

Impact on policy: nil.

Impact on politics: injury of our own creation

Quiet Em

(3,095 posts)
197. For the record, Genevieve McDonald didn't leak this to rightwingers
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:22 PM
2 hrs ago

the WSJ already had the info and McDonald just confirmed it as did a current Platner staffer.

Genevieve McDonald was asked by current Platner staffers to lie to the WSJ and she refused to do that.

So, no. She's not Linda Tripp.

Nanjeanne

(6,679 posts)
198. For the record there isn't much on the record. No actual texts have been seen so we have zero info
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:30 PM
2 hrs ago

On who these women are or what was said. We have McDonald’s statements. But as I said, I don’t give a crap about it at all at this point. Is Platner’s team handling this well? No. But then when Bill said “it depends on what your definition of is is” or “I did not have sex with that woman” I thought he and his team were pretty inept too.

orangecrush

(31,346 posts)
190. Looks like the GOP better worry about losing the Senate
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 12:41 PM
5 hrs ago

Instead of his tattoos.

I love the smell of MAGA fear and flop sweat in the morning.

Smells like ... Victory!

obamanut2012

(29,545 posts)
199. Nazi tats, has treated women badly and talked about them worse, and was a RW mercenary
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:33 PM
2 hrs ago

And has lied about is backgrouynd.

Sorry, I don't ahve to swallow all of that, and saying we are just doing a "purity" test is insulting to many people.

Janet Mills is still on the ballot and hasn't withdrawn. Hope she wins. Thsi dude is bad news. He is not a good candidate.

Kingofalldems

(40,378 posts)
210. Platner getting the Al Franken treatment from the RW trolls we have on DU.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:08 PM
8 min ago

For the record--I did not say everyone but a recognizable few.


There is a definite campaign going on. The same people who claimed Trump victory in Iran are in on it.

obamanut2012

(29,545 posts)
212. If I was in Maine I would vote for Mills, I do not trust Platner
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:10 PM
6 min ago

And believe he will be Swalwelled.

So, please tell me why I'm a troll?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re Platner - We can bask ...