General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums*snerk*
Heard online:
If he wants his portrait on money so badly, let's bring back the penny.
It's orange, practically useless and costs more than it's worth. Perfect!
DiverDave
(5,265 posts)But. His mug on billions of pennies?
Pass...
TommieMommy
(3,134 posts)malaise
(298,454 posts)Rec
underpants
(197,394 posts)3catwoman3
(29,892 posts)MineralMan
(151,748 posts)In England and later Great Britain, every new monarch got his or her portrait on the coinage and currency of the realm. That started as soon as the coronation was over.
In the United States, everyone agreed that such a practice should never be put in place in our nation. Clearly it was precisely because we declared our independence from a monarchy that did exactly that. It was a measured and consensual agreement by the founders. No living Kngs' or Queens' heads on our money. Once their dead, maybe we can use Presidents' likenesses, if they were good presidents.
That was a good decision, and we should stick with it.
No Kings in the USA!
Sogo
(7,332 posts)Hmmm....
dflprincess
(29,437 posts)Whoever appears on U,S. currency is supposed to be deceased.
Old Crank
(7,361 posts)surely the GOP would go for the penny.....
Wednesdays
(23,258 posts)...when the Lincoln penny was introduced. Before 1909, the portraits were usually of "Lady Liberty" in some form. There was also the Indian Head penny from 1859-1909, using a portrait of a generic Native American.