Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Women's right to vote under attack as the SAVE Act is back as a real threat: (Original Post) applegrove 8 hrs ago OP
Quiet, Piggy nt GenThePerservering 7 hrs ago #1
I thought it was already clearly determined to violate the Byrd rule. pat_k 7 hrs ago #2
The SAVE act doesn't meet requirements for a reconciliation bill Fiendish Thingy 7 hrs ago #3
I agree - the Senate Parliamentarian would strike it (although the fools may over-ride her). waterwatcher123 5 hrs ago #6
I thought this too. Cerulean Southpaw 3 hrs ago #7
Florida's had an approved license for years. It was a hassle to get it and it's really allegorical oracle 3 hrs ago #8
it will NOT be allowed under reconcilliation Wiz Imp 7 hrs ago #4
WITH OR WITHOUT PASSING THE SAVE ACT, they are PROCEEDING where it matters to them via STATES and USPS lostnfound 7 hrs ago #5

pat_k

(14,278 posts)
2. I thought it was already clearly determined to violate the Byrd rule.
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 04:46 PM
7 hrs ago

It not a budget measure.

Fiendish Thingy

(24,326 posts)
3. The SAVE act doesn't meet requirements for a reconciliation bill
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 05:01 PM
7 hrs ago

It’s not going to pass.

It would suppress as many or more republican votes as democrats, since fewer republicans have passports.

waterwatcher123

(561 posts)
6. I agree - the Senate Parliamentarian would strike it (although the fools may over-ride her).
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 06:57 PM
5 hrs ago

This action would not stand in a federal court either.

7. I thought this too.
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 08:47 PM
3 hrs ago

Republicans are less likely to have passports, and the states with approved driver licenses are mostly blue states.

allegorical oracle

(6,644 posts)
8. Florida's had an approved license for years. It was a hassle to get it and it's really
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 08:53 PM
3 hrs ago

going to piss people off if the Save Act demands further documentation. Took me two trips (140 miles total) to get mine done.

lostnfound

(17,689 posts)
5. WITH OR WITHOUT PASSING THE SAVE ACT, they are PROCEEDING where it matters to them via STATES and USPS
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 05:32 PM
7 hrs ago

1. Multiple states have ALREADY passed an equivalent to the SAVE act, OR intend to enact provisions via Board of Elections processes
*These provisions include mandating the state voter lists be purged based on lists sent to them from federal government agencies (USPS, SSA) or from other state agencies — at least monthly or even weekly
*Failing to purge voter rolls would subject bureau of elections employees to penalties or risk, but purging voter rolls in error causes no penalty
2. An executive order of March 31, 2026 requires the post office to provide lists to state agencies of ‘suspected noncitizens’
3. A new proposal requires the post office to stop delivery of absentee ballots to anyone not on a federal approved voter list.
4. The post office wants to require individualized bar codes on the outside of the envelopes — which will make it super convenient to delay or reroute based on bar codes to holding tanks long enough to delay large groups of democratic ballots from delivery until the day after the election.
https://www.wishtv.com/news/politics/trump-usps-voter-data-fight/

From Marc Elias’ group Democracy Docket, a judge says it’s too early to block it…give it a little time and we will see it is too late to block it

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/judge-denies-attempt-to-stop-trumps-mail-voting-order/
A federal judge said it’s too soon to block President Donald Trump’s latest push to restrict mail voting ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Trump signed an executive order in March directing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to work with the Social Security Administration (SSA) to create lists of verified U.S. citizens eligible to vote in each state, which it calls “State Citizenship Lists.” It also instructs the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to send absentee ballots only to voters on approved lists submitted by states, also called “Mail-In and Absentee Participation List. ”

Led by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Democrats quickly sued to block the order.*
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Women's right to vote und...