Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbabe

(6,991 posts)
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 01:50 PM 9 hrs ago

Kagan on the record: Scathing dissent unravels Supreme Court claim Trump wasn't racial using his own remarks

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-racist-haiti/

Scathing dissent unravels Supreme Court claim Trump wasn't racial using his own remarks

Tom Boggioni
June 25, 2026 1:28PM ET

In her dissent from one of the Thursday Supreme Court decisions on immigrant rights, Justice Elena Kagan made sure Donald Trump’s litany of racist remarks would be a forever part of the court’s historical record.



The liberal justice used her dissent in a case where the conservative majority gave the president the legal authority to strip Temporary Protected Status from over 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians, among others, to call out the president for his flagrant racism.



Looking at her laptop, she read, “’Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating the pets of the people that live in Springfield.’ And ‘Haitians are also,’ and this is the quote, ‘eating other things too that they're not supposed to be.’ And Haitians in the United States, quote, ‘Probably have AIDS’. And Haiti, is quote, 'A whole country which is,’ quote, ‘filthy, dirty and disgusting,’ end quote.” She continued, “And, Haitian immigration is, quote, ‘Like a death wish for our country.’ And Haitians, along with some others, are quote, ‘Poisoning the blood,' end quote, of our country. And finally, this is a statement from the president that ‘we only take people from s-hole countries like Haiti and Somalia. Why can't we have some people from Norway and Sweden?’”



“The majority briefly replies that those remarks are not 'overtly racial,' but it is hard to know what that means,” Kagan wrote, before adding, “Haitians are Black. (Norwegians and Swedes not so much.) The references—of filth, disease, and primitiveness—are shot through with racial stereotypes and tropes. It is hard to imagine the statements being made today of any white community.”

//
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kagan on the record: Scathing dissent unravels Supreme Court claim Trump wasn't racial using his own remarks (Original Post) cbabe 9 hrs ago OP
She read her dissent in open court, which is very uncommon hookaleft 9 hrs ago #1
;-{) THIS Goonch 8 hrs ago #2
Accurate depiction of these evil MFers! kimbutgar 4 hrs ago #13
DAMN !!! She is On Fire !!! Good for her. dave99 8 hrs ago #3
To be honest, reading her words, I believe she was really holding back. Scalded Nun 7 hrs ago #4
Imagine relogic 7 hrs ago #5
Well done, Justice Kagan! 3catwoman3 6 hrs ago #6
K & R malaise 6 hrs ago #7
Kagan is brilliant. ShazzieB 6 hrs ago #8
Kick dalton99a 6 hrs ago #9
I'm sure the three liberal justices are fed up with the blatant abuse of power by the Roberts cabal. Lonestarblue 5 hrs ago #10
6 black robed racist psychopaths on SCOTUS... just sickening LymphocyteLover 5 hrs ago #11
This ruling today has made me so depressed kimbutgar 4 hrs ago #12
It wasn't overtly racial in that MFer didn't say "blacks". maxsolomon 4 hrs ago #14

Scalded Nun

(1,751 posts)
4. To be honest, reading her words, I believe she was really holding back.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 03:43 PM
7 hrs ago

We all obviously have to deal with the fallout from these decisions, but she and her 2 sane colleagues have to sit there and watch this racism and corruption unfold and be proudly displayed right in front of them.

relogic

(383 posts)
5. Imagine
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 03:49 PM
7 hrs ago

what even a Justice slightly equipped with some intelligence and dexterity understanding our English language must think sitting in their esteemed, bone-weary benches.

“I’m endowed with power given me by a lower I.q., insane man and a corporate bought legislature that I endorse completely. Somebody, please pinch me (they say), this whole dictator s**t has turned out better than I expected.”

malaise

(299,580 posts)
7. K & R
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 04:40 PM
6 hrs ago

I am waiting to hear if the CJs two Irish children are American but children born in the US are not.

ShazzieB

(23,073 posts)
8. Kagan is brilliant.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 04:50 PM
6 hrs ago

She's written some amazing dissents. As much as I hate that it's been necessary for her (and Sotomayor and Jackson) to do that, I derive a tiny bit of comfort from the knowledge that that these incisive and sharply worded dissents are now part of the permanent record, to be read by every scholar who studies those cases and every future Supreme Court justice who is called on to rule on a related case in the future.

I also take pleasure in imaging how certain other members of the Roberts Court (no need to name names!) will be eviscerated in the writings of future legal scholars.

Lonestarblue

(13,639 posts)
10. I'm sure the three liberal justices are fed up with the blatant abuse of power by the Roberts cabal.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 05:37 PM
5 hrs ago

They gutted the Voting Rights Act even though it was Constitutional law passed by Congress. They gave special protections to evangelical Christians allowing them to violate anti-discrimination laws based on gender. They gave extraordinary power to wealthy people and corporations to buy elections. A d now they've basically said that the US has no asylum laws because their president can deny asylum based on his personal racism toward black and brown people.

I will no longer be surprised if this group of Republicans who have appointed themselves as the makers of law, not the interpreters of law, by negating Congress's role in passing the laws that don't support their personal religious and racist biases.

kimbutgar

(27,716 posts)
12. This ruling today has made me so depressed
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 06:33 PM
4 hrs ago

I’m not Haitian but these are our fellow human beings who are now are going to be harassed and deported back to a country where they will have an uncertain fate.

And the repuke evil supreme court all say they are xtians but forgot the Bible verse I was a stranger and you welcomed me.

maxsolomon

(39,422 posts)
14. It wasn't overtly racial in that MFer didn't say "blacks".
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:30 PM
4 hrs ago

He said Haitians. Kagan called them on it, but the Trump 6 DGAF.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kagan on the record: Scat...