Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AStern

(997 posts)
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:37 AM 6 hrs ago

If the US player that had their red card overturned had an nth of integrity - he'd voluntary sit out the game.

The world of soccer is rightfully outraged. This would right the ship and be a nice FU to Donald Trump.

Just my thoughts.

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the US player that had their red card overturned had an nth of integrity - he'd voluntary sit out the game. (Original Post) AStern 6 hrs ago OP
Why was it thrown out? SSJVegeta 6 hrs ago #1
Orangina apparently got involved. AStern 6 hrs ago #2
... SSJVegeta 6 hrs ago #4
It is a one game ban, not the entire rest of the tournament. It is an outrageous decision by FIFA. If Balogun plays Celerity 5 hrs ago #12
Oh geez that makes the reversal even dumber SSJVegeta 5 hrs ago #21
That is overstating the memory of football fans massively to impugn the USMNT... Moostache 5 hrs ago #22
The Argies are forever tainted due to that goal, especially in England, where I grew up. Celerity 5 hrs ago #26
It seems a blown call during the course of the game exboyfil 3 hrs ago #57
it was not a blown call Celerity 1 hr ago #69
It makes me wonder if other world leaders do this too? LeftInTX 3 hrs ago #50
I suspect you are onto something SSJVegeta 3 hrs ago #53
He will and should play. nt LexVegas 6 hrs ago #3
How Trumpian AStern 6 hrs ago #5
It's kind of a no win situation ITAL 5 hrs ago #14
His parents are Nigerian and he was unexpectedly born in the USA, so your criticism of him is rather....nt LexVegas 5 hrs ago #19
The red card is the red card angrychair 3 hrs ago #43
I think the red cars was bs. Happy Hoosier 2 hrs ago #62
Doesn't require your agreement angrychair 2 hrs ago #64
Profoundly disagree. This decision shows the utter corruption of FIFA. Celerity 5 hrs ago #18
I blame corrupt FIFA and Trump newdeal2 6 hrs ago #6
That may be true, HOWEVER Jilly_in_VA 5 hrs ago #7
Sometimes ref decisions suck. TommyT139 4 hrs ago #39
The worst part of the red card is... jmowreader 1 hr ago #68
Not his fault mcar 5 hrs ago #8
Unless they believe the red card wasn't valid in the first place EdmondDantes_ 5 hrs ago #9
In my view the fact they waited so long is what is insane. I could almost swallow immediate reversal but not this n/t Cheezoholic 5 hrs ago #17
Any sports org that has the right (its in their charter) to reverse any suspension at any time without explanation Cheezoholic 5 hrs ago #10
Oh, the red card wasn't overturned: his suspension was suspended! Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #11
It shows why soccer is ridiculous and stuck in the past Wanderlust988 5 hrs ago #13
Because red cards are egregious fouls angrychair 3 hrs ago #44
This isn't about Balogun's integrity JFC! Ponietz 5 hrs ago #15
This just in...FIFA declares England the champions of the 1986 World Cup Moostache 5 hrs ago #16
That Argentina world cup win is tainted forever..oh wait, not its not. nt LexVegas 5 hrs ago #28
Why? ProfessorGAC 5 hrs ago #20
Red cards in football do not require intent. nt Celerity 5 hrs ago #32
Irrelevant ProfessorGAC 5 hrs ago #34
I'm not a soccer expert either. BannonsLiver 5 hrs ago #35
Yeah, I Get That ProfessorGAC 4 hrs ago #36
So you advocate for no rules? angrychair 3 hrs ago #48
This is not the way the world works. That is not how professional Soccer works. maxsolomon 5 hrs ago #23
Why was this ref even on the pitch for the World Cup? JCMach1 5 hrs ago #27
Oh that's crazy. maxsolomon 5 hrs ago #29
U don't put this dude on the big stage FFS JCMach1 5 hrs ago #30
lol this is definitely how fifa soccer works WhiskeyGrinder 5 hrs ago #31
I mean the OP's "iota of integrity" comment maxsolomon 4 hrs ago #37
Red cards in football do not require intent. nt Celerity 5 hrs ago #33
No, the team did not ask for a review angrychair 3 hrs ago #51
Not the player!!! The coach! And the team. Grins 5 hrs ago #24
Why? It was a bogus call JCMach1 5 hrs ago #25
I agree. Or the coach should do it. Walleye 4 hrs ago #38
Nope. It's a game. If the rules allow him to play, he should play. Iggo 4 hrs ago #40
"Dez caught it" The 2026 variant. Torchlight 4 hrs ago #41
LOL. Iggo 3 hrs ago #47
And anyone who disagrees with that is wrong Torchlight 3 hrs ago #49
Agree Grim Chieftain 3 hrs ago #42
Why would he sit out? Not even FIFA agreed with the call. Melon 3 hrs ago #45
That isn't true angrychair 3 hrs ago #55
King Charles needs to call in now😁 Melon 2 hrs ago #61
Best way out of no win situation Mordred 3 hrs ago #46
Football players are not really known for their integrity until long after the fact sarisataka 3 hrs ago #52
Oh ok angrychair 3 hrs ago #56
You totally missed the point sarisataka 2 hrs ago #60
That happened before the world cup angrychair 2 hrs ago #63
It happened during qualifiers where Ronaldo was carded for violent conduct sarisataka 2 hrs ago #65
His situation is unique angrychair 2 hrs ago #66
We don't know that influenced the decision sarisataka 2 hrs ago #67
Yes. I don't understand animosity towards a player exboyfil 3 hrs ago #58
Someone with that particular type and degree of integrity wouldn't be in a FIFA event in the first place. RockRaven 3 hrs ago #54
Red card was NOT overturned angrychair 3 hrs ago #59

AStern

(997 posts)
2. Orangina apparently got involved.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:41 AM
6 hrs ago

Not sure if that's so but that's what is being reported.

SSJVegeta

(3,495 posts)
4. ...
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:42 AM
6 hrs ago

Like. I'd be okay with it if they reversed jahrell quansahs red card too. And the rest after they've missed a game. Hell just change the rules. Banning a player an entire tournament over something relatively minor is dumb.

Celerity

(55,495 posts)
12. It is a one game ban, not the entire rest of the tournament. It is an outrageous decision by FIFA. If Balogun plays
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:50 AM
5 hrs ago

against Belgium (and even worse if he scores or assists a goal or goals) the USMNT will be massively tainted for ages. FIFA already is. The game's integrity is on the line.

As a life-long footie fan, I am appalled at the corruption.

SSJVegeta

(3,495 posts)
21. Oh geez that makes the reversal even dumber
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:56 AM
5 hrs ago

Thanks for the clarification!

Yeah I mean if they are gonna reverse one reverse all.. enough with this special treatment bullshit

Moostache

(11,359 posts)
22. That is overstating the memory of football fans massively to impugn the USMNT...
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:56 AM
5 hrs ago

1986 Argentina still claims the World Cup when they won with BLATANT CHEATING by Maradonna on the game deciding goal...the "Hand of God" is infamous to this date, but the players were celebrated and still legitimately call them selves "World Cup Champions - 1986" despite that controversy...

Celerity

(55,495 posts)
26. The Argies are forever tainted due to that goal, especially in England, where I grew up.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 12:22 PM
5 hrs ago

They are forever shackled with the 'cheaters' label.

Yes, the second Maradona goal of that 1986 game was arguably the greatest goal in WC history, but the stench of the illegal handball goal will never be removed.

The USMNT needs to do the right thing and not play Balogun in this upcoming game.

Win or lose it is the right thing to do. Not giving a toss about the integrity and employing 'the ends justify the means' as a modus operandi simply will further serve to vilify and entrench the US in the eyes of the world as a bully and a cheat, a nation that always demands 'rules for thee, never for me' special treatment.

exboyfil

(18,387 posts)
57. It seems a blown call during the course of the game
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:42 PM
3 hrs ago

is a lot less severe than an example of FIFA succumbing to pressure to change a legitimate decision.

Everything Trump touches, dies (except him and his grifter family).

LeftInTX

(35,078 posts)
50. It makes me wonder if other world leaders do this too?
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:27 PM
3 hrs ago

Trump was really quick to do this. I'm pretty sure he got the idea from somewhere.

I'm not a sports person (except I love my Spurs and I follow a few Olympic sports) and I'm not following the world cup. However, if world leaders have been doing this years, then it shows that the sport is rigged. I know that FIFA is corrupt and I saw most of a documentary about it on Netflix a few years ago.

ITAL

(1,459 posts)
14. It's kind of a no win situation
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:52 AM
5 hrs ago

The guy didn't deserve a red card in the first place, so the punishment was beyond extreme. So it's one of those two wrongs don't make a right thing.

Fans of Team USA were rightfully ticked off he was red carded in the first place, but Belgium fans are likewise totally justified that his serving the suspension ALSO being delayed is a miscarriage of justice.

LexVegas

(6,976 posts)
19. His parents are Nigerian and he was unexpectedly born in the USA, so your criticism of him is rather....nt
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:55 AM
5 hrs ago

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
43. The red card is the red card
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:08 PM
3 hrs ago

There are lots of things people wish they could go back and undo but that isn't how it works.

The decision was a red card, doesn't require our agreement and he should serve the penalty like anyone else that has been given a red card during the world cup.

Him playing would send the wrong message to the world and taint any success we might have in the game tonight.

Happy Hoosier

(9,749 posts)
62. I think the red cars was bs.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:48 PM
2 hrs ago

Wasn’t even called a foul on the field. The “offense” was inadvertent. The call stinks of an attempt to hamstring the US’s top player.

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
64. Doesn't require your agreement
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:55 PM
2 hrs ago

So does every other country that got a red card get to cry about it and get changed for them too?

What if they don't think the score is fair?
Do we get FIFA to award us extra goals so we can win?

Celerity

(55,495 posts)
18. Profoundly disagree. This decision shows the utter corruption of FIFA.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:53 AM
5 hrs ago

It is destroying what is left of the integrity of the game.

newdeal2

(5,691 posts)
6. I blame corrupt FIFA and Trump
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:46 AM
6 hrs ago

Those are the ones who need to explain themselves and be held accountable.

Jilly_in_VA

(14,785 posts)
7. That may be true, HOWEVER
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:47 AM
5 hrs ago

It had no business being a red card to begin with and that ref should be admonished big time. It was a yellow at best. The foul was purely unintentional and the sort of thing that, while really bad, happens in a hard-fought game. Which brings the question, did you SEE the game, and the foul?

IMNSHO, Gianni Infantino has no business being president of FIFA, any more than Shitler has being president of the US, But here we are.

TommyT139

(2,558 posts)
39. Sometimes ref decisions suck.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 01:31 PM
4 hrs ago

That's part of any sport.

Just as Trump does with judges when he doesn't like their decisions, he threw his considerable weight around. That's the only real difference here.

Along with the fact that Trump could deport this guy's family, and move him to the top of the deport-birthright-citizens list.

jmowreader

(53,583 posts)
68. The worst part of the red card is...
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 04:10 PM
1 hr ago

The referee actually went to the video replay system, watched Balogun and Muharemovic get tangled up fighting for the ball and Muharemovic accidentally get stepped on, and red carded him for an obviously accidental move.

EdmondDantes_

(2,307 posts)
9. Unless they believe the red card wasn't valid in the first place
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:49 AM
5 hrs ago

Should every player have refused to play in Qatar or Russia because those countries have horrible human rights records? What about the decades of corruption in FIFA?

Or is it only because we hate Trump so much that we think he's the only bad thing in the world? Stop being so obsessed with Trump that you have to position everything as a fuck you to Trump. He's not worth that much of your energy.

Cheezoholic

(4,191 posts)
17. In my view the fact they waited so long is what is insane. I could almost swallow immediate reversal but not this n/t
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:52 AM
5 hrs ago

Cheezoholic

(4,191 posts)
10. Any sports org that has the right (its in their charter) to reverse any suspension at any time without explanation
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:50 AM
5 hrs ago

is corrupt, period.

Prairie Gates

(8,734 posts)
11. Oh, the red card wasn't overturned: his suspension was suspended!
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:50 AM
5 hrs ago


I think it is difficult to convey the amount of contempt both in the foreign press and in other countries about this decision. Like, read the comments for very mainstream publications like Italy's La Gazzetta Dello Sport or BBC Sport or Deutsche Welle sports pages. They run 99-1 absolutely trashing this. Infantino a mafioso. Make Trump the referee. What do you expect - it's the USA. That sort of thing. Meanwhile, Americans are like "I don't really watch much soccer but that definitely 100% was not a red flag! USA! USA!"

It is to fucking laugh.

Wanderlust988

(806 posts)
13. It shows why soccer is ridiculous and stuck in the past
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:51 AM
5 hrs ago

They need to update their rules to allow for challenges. Even the NBA and the NFL allow for coachs' challenges now. Also, I can see why red cards will get you kicked out of the game, but why the next game too? It's not like he punched someone. These ridiculous rules are the reason we have such controversies.

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
44. Because red cards are egregious fouls
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:15 PM
3 hrs ago

That are due to a player that acted in a overly reckless and dangerous manner.

Red cards exist because often the act they are being carded for doing either lead to a serious injury of the other player or could have lead to a serious injury of another player.

Sometimes it's for behavior as well.

The point of the game suspension is to not allow teams to benefit from dangerous and reckless play by losing the player for a game or more. Some suspensions can last for three or more games in regular season play.

Ponietz

(4,710 posts)
15. This isn't about Balogun's integrity JFC!
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:52 AM
5 hrs ago

Same kind of thing I read here yesterday: blame the kids for their obnoxious parents.

I feel very sorry for Balogun and the US Men, but I’m not surprised since the FIFA pEaCE pwIzE made it clear from the beginning we were watching a clown show.

UEFA could be weighing a complete break with FIFA. I hope that’s what this leads to.

Moostache

(11,359 posts)
16. This just in...FIFA declares England the champions of the 1986 World Cup
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:52 AM
5 hrs ago

They have reviewed the "Hand of God" and (RIGHTLY) determined that Maradona CHEATED BLATANTLY and the goal that was allowed should not have been:



So there's that...

Also just in, MLB has reviewed the play at first base between the 1985 Cardinals and Royals and overturned that injustice as well... the St. Louis Cardinals may now claim their 12th World Championship, which was denied them because of this:



ProfessorGAC

(77,752 posts)
20. Why?
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:56 AM
5 hrs ago

He's already been effectively acquitted because it was determined there was no intent.
I'm no soccer expert but it sure didn't look intentional to me.
So, he should sit out because he accidentally collided with an opponent which happens 25 times per game anyway?
I don't understand the fascination with relitigating this and punishing the player, the team, & the fans.
He didn't do a thing to get the suspension rescinded. He didn't even whine about before it was lifted.
Now, he should punish himself?
You're letting The Failure's involvement transfer the stench of corruption to a guy that just plays soccer.

ProfessorGAC

(77,752 posts)
34. Irrelevant
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 12:38 PM
5 hrs ago

Try again.
Your reply has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
Oh, and I may be American & older but I knew what you posted.

BannonsLiver

(21,088 posts)
35. I'm not a soccer expert either.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 12:42 PM
5 hrs ago

I’m not able to determine if it was a “good” or “bad” call by the officials. However, I think what has people concerned and upset isn’t necessarily the red card itself, but the appearance that Trump simply waved a finger and it went away. That he somehow has direct influence over outcomes on the field. Whether that’s true or not I can’t say but it’s not hard to understand how the international football community of fans and media etc could quickly draw that conclusion.

ProfessorGAC

(77,752 posts)
36. Yeah, I Get That
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 12:48 PM
4 hrs ago

I just disagree that it is relevant.
Do I think a head of state should insert him/herself in this way? No.
Do I think this was just a cynical effort by The Failure to look important, influential & "'Murcan"? Yes, for sure.
Still has nothing to do with whether a guy whose suspension was rescinded should play, especially since I didn't think suspension was warranted in the first place.
It's just a game. Let the players do what they do & ignore the behind the scenes nonsense. It's already known as a cesspool of corruption. Once we sent a team to this tournament there is no moral high ground.


angrychair

(12,617 posts)
48. So you advocate for no rules?
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:24 PM
3 hrs ago

That is what you are saying. That trans should only have to follow the rules when they want but can ignore them at will.

What kind of game is it when teams can just ignore rules whenever they don't like a decision that went against them?

What about all the other teams that got red cards or even yellow cards?
I mean what if I don't agree with the score?

I mean I would love for FIFA to change the score in the Netherlands last game so they actually win. I demand FIFA award Netherlands 10 automatic goals in that game because I think that is only fair.

maxsolomon

(39,504 posts)
23. This is not the way the world works. That is not how professional Soccer works.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 12:06 PM
5 hrs ago

Last edited Mon Jul 6, 2026, 12:56 PM - Edit history (1)

The card was BS. Yellow, sure, but Red?

Red requires "intentionality" and "brutality". Neither were present in that foul - Balogan landed on the Tarik Muharemović's ankle coming down from a jump. It was unavoidable. It looks 10x worse in slow-motion on VAR than in real time. The Bosnian player was fine. He played the rest of the game.

Trump called Infantino, sure. He wasn't the only one - USMNT had to ask formally for a review.

JCMach1

(29,283 posts)
27. Why was this ref even on the pitch for the World Cup?
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 12:23 PM
5 hrs ago

Ref who gave Folarin Balogun a red card was previously accused of match fixing - Yahoo Sports https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/ref-gave-folarin-balogun-red-141514316.html

maxsolomon

(39,504 posts)
29. Oh that's crazy.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 12:26 PM
5 hrs ago

RIGGED!

The accusations stemmed from the owner of Brazilian club Botafogo, who submitted audio recordings that featured a different official claiming refs were taking bribes.

Claus was called to testify, along with his VAR at the time.

The Brazilian Football Confederation found no proof of any wrongdoing by Claus.

So yes, there was an accusation, but nothing more was leveled against Claus at the time.

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
51. No, the team did not ask for a review
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:29 PM
3 hrs ago

That is not how the world cup works. There are no reviews or appeals in World Cup games.

So should other teams demand changes in their red cards too? How about yellow cards?

How about their scores they don't like? Should teams that lost get to demand FIFA award them additional goals so they can win and stay in the tournament?

Doesn't matter if any of us agrees with the red card or not, it did not require our agreement.

That was the decision and that's it. Continuing to cry about it looks pathetic and makes us look like spoiled and entitled brats.

Walleye

(45,889 posts)
38. I agree. Or the coach should do it.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 01:00 PM
4 hrs ago

Even if the US team wins this round, it will be forever orange tainted.

Iggo

(50,162 posts)
40. Nope. It's a game. If the rules allow him to play, he should play.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 01:38 PM
4 hrs ago

I think the call was flimsy, and the reversal was a thousand times flimsier. But if he’s allowed to play, he should play. It’s a game.

Torchlight

(7,333 posts)
41. "Dez caught it" The 2026 variant.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 01:39 PM
4 hrs ago

Everybody knows for a fact that anyone who disagrees with them is wrong.

Torchlight

(7,333 posts)
49. And anyone who disagrees with that is wrong
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:27 PM
3 hrs ago

And mustard still tastes the same as it did last week.

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
55. That isn't true
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:36 PM
3 hrs ago

This was just a suspension of the red card. He would still have to serve a one game suspension at some point during this tournament.

What about the other people that have got red cards in this tournament? I'm sure they don't agree with those red cards either.
I mean England had a player get a red card yesterday and they won but they will have to play their next game without that player.

Is that fair to them? I mean they don't agree with that red card either and they don't want their guy suspended either.
Why can't they get the same special treatment or is it only when Americans don't agree with a ruling?

Mordred

(241 posts)
46. Best way out of no win situation
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:19 PM
3 hrs ago

is if the game goes to kicks after 120 minutes, at that point it really won't matter if Balogun played or not unless he scored/set up several goals or had a dramatic late equalizer.

sarisataka

(23,122 posts)
52. Football players are not really known for their integrity until long after the fact
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:29 PM
3 hrs ago

Maradona‘s goal against England in the World Cup, Henry’s goal against Ireland in the qualifiers against Ireland. Long after the results could not be changed both admitted they scored key goals illegally.

However, to be fair when was the last time you saw a player in the World Series tell the umpire no that was a strike I’m out. Or a (American) football player saying I did not have control of the ball until it hit the ground. The pass should be incomplete.

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
56. Oh ok
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:42 PM
3 hrs ago

So this is the "others cheated in the past so that makes it ok" rationale.

The issue is very straightforward: he got a red card. That's it. No other arguments.

It's a one game suspension. They didn't void the red card, it still stands and he still has to serve a one game suspension no matter what.

What FIFA is doing is carving out a special exception, just for him, to keep playing while the US is in the tournament and once they are out, he would have to serve a one game suspension back in his regular league play.

No other countries have been given that capability.

sarisataka

(23,122 posts)
60. You totally missed the point
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:47 PM
2 hrs ago

You are singling out a single player for integrity will ignoring the mass of players and multiple sports who have even less integrity.

It is within the FIFA rules to give him probation rather than a one game suspension. It is not a special exception it has been given to others. He will not have to serve the suspension with his league. International play and league play are two entirely separate situations.

By rule, Ronaldo should have had to sit out Portugal‘s first two matches. He was given the same terms as the US player and he played in both games. I did not notice anyone calling out Ronaldo for lacking integrity and saying he should’ve sat out.

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
63. That happened before the world cup
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:53 PM
2 hrs ago

This happened during the world cup.
No player that was given a red card during the world cup is getting to avoid serving their one game suspension.

I mean an England player got a red card yesterday and England won. Should they get their one game suspension suspended?

Red card is a red card, serve the damn one game suspension and move the fuck on.

It's absolutely ridiculous for people to be crying about this like spoiled children.

sarisataka

(23,122 posts)
65. It happened during qualifiers where Ronaldo was carded for violent conduct
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 03:01 PM
2 hrs ago

Per FIFA rules that mandates a three match band in international play. He sat out one game, the last qualifier, which was meaningless by that point and his remaining suspension was changed to probation, allowing him to play in the World Cup.

I don’t believe the English player should have his rescinded because it was clearly serious foul play. I believe the Mexico goalkeeper should have been reviewed for a possible red card when he took down the English player inside the 18 yard box.

If you were to ask Iran, they would say Belgium should not be in the game either because they were robbed on an offside goal and Iran should be in the knockout rather than Belgium. No one is questioning Belgium‘s right to be where they are.

My personal opinion, is you play the game the calls go your way or not and you let the chips fall where they may. I think Ronaldo should’ve had to sit two games Balogun should sit out this game and Messi got lucky because the name on the back of his jersey is Messi

My objection is everybody is singling out one US player and falsely claiming his situation is unique.

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
66. His situation is unique
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 03:13 PM
2 hrs ago

Because the leader of his country called the head of FIFA to get the penalty overturned.

Fruit of the poison tree and all that.

sarisataka

(23,122 posts)
67. We don't know that influenced the decision
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 03:27 PM
2 hrs ago

but we also do not know it didn't.

I agree that does taint the probation even if that is what FIFA was going to do anyway.

exboyfil

(18,387 posts)
58. Yes. I don't understand animosity towards a player
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:45 PM
3 hrs ago

The refs and umpires on the other hand.

You take whatever call the ref gives you. The only exception is collusion.

RockRaven

(20,154 posts)
54. Someone with that particular type and degree of integrity wouldn't be in a FIFA event in the first place.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:35 PM
3 hrs ago

angrychair

(12,617 posts)
59. Red card was NOT overturned
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:46 PM
3 hrs ago

The red card still stands and he still has to serve a one game suspension at some point.

This was a special exception given just to the US team for him to keep playing and once they are out of the world cup, when he goes back to regular season play, he will have to serve a one game suspension.
No other team was given that option for their players that for a red card.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the US player that had...