General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFCC Chairman: Any time the president delivers news or content in primetime,broadcasters should make sure public can see
Sounds like a threat.
NN: Should networks air Trump's speech?
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-07-16T01:52:44.897Z
CARR: Of course. Any time the president delivers news or content in primetime, broadcasters should make sure public can see it
N: Do they have a responsibility in terms of TV licenses?
C: Broadcasters have an obligation to operate in the public interest
Chasstev365
(8,592 posts)Ocelot II
(132,117 posts)That way the public interest is served by showing the speech on one broadcast tv network (god forbid anybody should have to watch C-SPAN) and by showing all the other scheduled programming that people actually want to watch. The loser network could throw in a whole lot of MAGA-friendly advertising before and after to make up for being stuck with the speech. Everybody wins!
make FOX show is and leave the rest of the networks alone. It his favorite network anyway.
rampartd
(5,980 posts)if the networks stick together, even ellison, murdoch, etc. they, and we, win.
if just one of these guys fold the others lose as well, the defector thinking he has an edge.
durablend
(9,555 posts)"It'd be a shame if something happened to your broadcast license"
newdeal2
(5,718 posts)Dems get the same amount of time right before the World Cup game.
GiqueCee
(5,301 posts)... "Jellybean" Reagan killed the Fairness Doctrine, which required equal time be given to opposing views. Leave it to a fucking Republican to piss in the punchbowl.
bucolic_frolic
(56,560 posts)or should that be gross-er-ies since people can't contain themselves?
Totally Tunsie
(12,278 posts)does a chump speech "deliver news or content in primetime"? They are just Festivus lists of grievances, TACO threats, and worthless promises. In other words, "nothing to see [here]".
Broadcasters, please take note.
CousinIT
(12,950 posts)That may be true (though it doesn't seem like it). If so, then they have an obligation - in the public interest - to refuse to air dangerous LIES about our elections, even if they are from a POTUS. ESPECIALLY if they are from a POTUS.
Rebl2
(18,039 posts)there is streaming and cable to watch if we choose to.