Trump admin brainstorms aggressive tactics to clear homeless camps in cities and forcibly hospitalize people, report
Source: The Independent
Saturday 26 April 2025 21:14 BST
Officials from the Justice Department who manage grant distributions are brainstorming ways to clear homeless encampments and increase the involuntary hospitalization of individuals with mental illnesses, according to an email obtained by The Washington Post. This represents the latest indication that the Trump administration is following through on commitments to aggressively remove homeless people from public spaces, as President Donald Trump spoke of during the 2024 campaign.
Just last month, the president issued an executive order aimed at making the District of Columbia safe and beautiful, which instructed the National Park Service to remove all homeless encampments from federal land in the capital. In the past, he has spoken of housing the homeless in tent cities on inexpensive land on the outskirts of cities and jailing those who refuse treatment.
The email was sent on Thursday evening to employees in the Office of Justice Programs and included eight questions asking for input on how best to direct resources to issues concerning homelessness and mental illness. Recipients have until Wednesday to submit their responses.
What can DOJ do to more efficiently shift chronic vagrants away from the public square and into a more concentrated space so that order can be restored and resources and services can be deployed more effectively? one of the questions read. The email stated that the White House had directed the department and other agencies to provide legislative, funding, and other solutions for issues related to homelessness, mental health, and more.
Read more: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-clear-homeless-encampments-mental-illness-b2740126.html
Full headline: Trump admin brainstorms aggressive tactics to clear homeless camps in cities and forcibly hospitalize people, report claims

AZJonnie
(759 posts)someplace with a bunch of tents? An 'encampment', if you will!
What's that? Oh, sure the fake news media will call it that, but it's not that at ALL! In fact, we also plan to provide them with work!
BumRushDaShow
(151,325 posts)NotHardly
(2,073 posts)History may not repeat itself but it frequently sings.
Dixiegrrrl
(32 posts)Usually not mentioned in most reports.
krkaufman
(13,851 posts)It seems intentional that they used the word.
AZJonnie
(759 posts)And the MAGAt's keep cheering 'it's what we voted for!' like a bunch of fucking fiends.
moniss
(7,131 posts)those they would go after.
Wuddles440
(1,680 posts)Healthcare resources are already at or near the breaking point in most areas.
Brainfodder
(7,199 posts)If only there were organizations that built human habitats.
IF ONLY....
IF ONLY there were a way to manufacturer homes at a reasonable cost.
IF ONLY....
Blackjackdavey
(207 posts)Hospitals aren't really part of it. Building more houses isn't really part of it. There are certainly individuals whose situation would change with each of those but as a group, unhoused folks would not be appreciably impacted by those things alone. One thing that would have a major impact, would likely never happen, would be banning and holding liable families who persecute and make their homes inhospitable to lgbtqia, neurodivetgent or mentally ill offspring.
NH Ethylene
(31,107 posts)If their children are adults they are under no obligation to continue to house them - no matter what the reason is. And that is as it should be.
If they are under age there are already laws that exist that require them to take care of them.
Javaman
(63,678 posts)they killed a couple of those folks.
just waiting for when, not if, now
Magoo48
(6,255 posts)Javaman
(63,678 posts)Welcome to block. Ta!😁
ananda
(31,552 posts)Or maybe they will force hospitals to incarcerate people
at their own expense (right)...
... or else find disused, derelicl buildings and just call
them hospitals (right).
underpants
(190,133 posts)Temporary Detaining Order
20 years ago I worked at a CSB. One small hospital got bought up by an expanding college. This city 2-4 TDO beds out. The crisis team said just those fewer beds changed everything.
Getting back to paying, are they going to PAY for more TDO beds? Those beds have to be available. Hospitals cant use them for anything else. Im guessing theres payment of some sort to keep them available but Id also guess occupied vs unoccupied are two different daily/hourly rates.
ananda
(31,552 posts)They don't.
EarthFirst
(3,629 posts)
looking for solutions to concentrate those deemed less than desirable
What in the fu*king fu*k!
I dont even recognize this place anymore
Nigrum Cattus
(481 posts)Who's "order"
Grins
(8,283 posts)Cant get any more Soviet than that!
the nelm
(71 posts)Iamscrewed
(160 posts)This has disturbing possibilities for ending very bad.
not fooled
(6,242 posts)Naw, can't do that...doesn't serve the interests of the billionaire class.
They are choosing to handle increasing inequality with increasing force.
Mawspam2
(931 posts)...just gather them all up and drop them on Haiti. No longer our problem.
maxrandb
(16,524 posts)Ahem.....TAX THE FUCKING RICH AND USE THOSE FUNDS TO HELP THE HOMELESS PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!
BurnDoubt
(276 posts)Remembering my childhood in central California. when passing through Napa, Ca. on our way to the Coast, they would point out the "Nut House", or hospital where patients would be sent if they had issues preventing them from being self-sufficient and homeless (or were an uncooperative wife, for that matter). Governor Ronald Reagan's signature accomplishment was to end those programs, for better or worse. Since then, homelessness has grown and become more of an issue. Hardly any resources are devoted to this, beyond volunteers handing out bread in soup lines. Presumably now we'll begin shipping them off to be housed by those who can sleep at night because they are unencumbered by inklings of Humanity. They're already on speed-dial. And we won't be forced to look at them. Fixed It!!!!!
BurnDoubt
(276 posts)much, much more attention needs to be brought to bear. This is a Tragedy, and the answers are nowhere evident in our discourse. This needs to be a "Red Ball" issue, all hands on deck.
Attilatheblond
(5,705 posts)They lived 'on campus'. They, and the residents of the hospital were dumped on the streets so Reagan could say he saved some dollars.
Hekate
(97,361 posts)One of those abominable private prisons? Tent city? Concentration camp?
El Salvador?
LisaL
(47,186 posts)Trump already said president of El Salvador needs to build more prisons.
bucolic_frolic
(49,994 posts)who we can sleep with, and "forcibly hospitalize" people who don't knuckle under.
Freedumb, y'all.
SSJVegeta
(429 posts)or closer to sending them to El Salvador or some other concentration camp. My fear is they are leaning towards the latter.
VMA131Marine
(4,960 posts)The Federal Government has no jurisdiction over homelessness in cities except maybe DC.
BumRushDaShow
(151,325 posts)
That's who they are talking about while Congress intentionally "forgot" to give the city a requested $1billion of funding with the last C.R. Then the Senate did a standalone for the money that they passed unanimously and sent over to the House, where the House promptly ignored it, and went on their break.